Tom 14, Nr 4 (2019)
CHOROBY TĘTNIC OBWODOWYCH
Opublikowany online: 2019-12-31

dostęp otwarty

Wyświetlenia strony 787
Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu 4540
Pobierz cytowanie

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Wybrane metody ciągłego monitorowania rzutu minutowego serca w pracowni hemodynamiki i na oddziale intensywnej opieki kardiologicznej

Aleksander Zeliaś1
Kardiol Inwazyjna 2019;14(4):16-23.

Streszczenie

In this review the most common methods of continuous cardiac
output monitoring, which may be used in patients submitted to
high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions in the cathlabs
or in patients with acute heart failure or shock in intensive
cardiac care units were shown. Briefly, classical Swan-Ganz
pulmonary artery catheter was described with some of the
newest technical developments (such as automatic cardiac
output and continuous oximetry measurement, right ventricular
diastolic volume and systolic function assessment), as well
as less invasive methods such as pulse contour analysis and
transpulmonary termodilution, which allow to calculate some
useful parameters to monitor and guide treatment according to
the principle of goal directed therapy. Finally, minimally invasive
doppler transesophageal technique and completely non-invasive
method of transthoracic bioimpedance were presented.

Artykuł dostępny w formacie PDF

Pokaż PDF Pobierz plik PDF

Referencje

  1. Vincent JL. Understanding cardiac output. Crit Care. 2008; 12(4): 174.
  2. Fincke R, Hochman JS, Lowe AM, et al. SHOCK Investigators. Cardiac power is the strongest hemodynamic correlate of mortality in cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK trial registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 44(2): 340–348.
  3. Pinsky MR. Why measure cardiac output? Crit Care. 2003; 7(2): 114–116.
  4. Atkinson TM, Ohman EM, O'Neill WW, et al. Interventional Scientific Council of the American College of Cardiology. A Practical Approach to Mechanical Circulatory Support in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Interventional Perspective. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9(9): 871–883.
  5. Gidwani UK, Goel S. The Pulmonary Artery Catheter in 2015: The Swan and the Phoenix. Cardiol Rev. 2016; 24(1): 1–13.
  6. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016; 37(27): 2129–2200.
  7. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014; 40(12): 1795–1815.
  8. Cooper AS. Pulmonary Artery Catheters for Adult Patients in Intensive Care. Crit Care Nurse. 2016; 36(2): 80–82.
  9. Giraud R, Bendjelid K. Hemodynamic Monitoring in the ICU. 2016.
  10. Wiesenack C, Fiegl C, Keyser A, et al. Continuously assessed right ventricular end-diastolic volume as a marker of cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated cardiac surgical patients. Crit Care. 2005; 9(3): R226–R233.
  11. Diebel LN, Wilson RF, Tagett MG, et al. End-diastolic volume. A better indicator of preload in the critically ill. Arch Surg. 1992; 127(7): 817–21; discussion 821.
  12. Pinsky MR, Vincent JL. Let us use the pulmonary artery catheter correctly and only when we need it. Crit Care Med. 2005; 33(5): 1119–1122.
  13. Knapp R. Hemodynamic monitoring made incredibly visual! Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015 Third edition. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=e000xww&AN=1473110&lang=pl&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
  14. Education EC. Edwards Clinical Education Quick Guide to Cardiopulmonary Care 4th Edition.
  15. Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, et al. Cardiac index measurements during rapid preload changes: a comparison of pulmonary artery thermodilution with arterial pulse contour analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2005; 17(4): 241–248.
  16. Linton R, Band D, O'Brien T, et al. Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement: a comparison with thermodilution. Crit Care Med. 1997; 25(11): 1796–1800.
  17. Hofer CK, Cannesson M. Monitoring fluid responsiveness. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2011; 49(2): 59–65.
  18. Cannesson M, Ramsingh D, Rinehart J, et al. Perioperative goal-directed therapy and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk abdominal surgery: a historical-prospective, comparative effectiveness study. Crit Care. 2015; 19: 261.
  19. Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, et al. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution. Crit Care Med. 1999; 27(11): 2407–2412.
  20. Jabot J, Monnet X, Bouchra L, et al. Cardiac function index provided by transpulmonary thermodilution behaves as an indicator of left ventricular systolic function. Crit Care Med. 2009; 37(11): 2913–2918.
  21. Michard F, Alaya S, Zarka V, et al. Global end-diastolic volume as an indicator of cardiac preload in patients with septic shock. Chest. 2003; 124(5): 1900–1908.
  22. Hofer CK, Furrer L, Matter-Ensner S, et al. Volumetric preload measurement by thermodilution: a comparison with transoesophageal echocardiography. Br J Anaesth. 2005; 94(6): 748–755.
  23. Eichhorn V, Goepfert MS, Eulenburg C, et al. Comparison of values in critically ill patients for global end-diastolic volume and extravascular lung water measured by transcardiopulmonary thermodilution: a meta-analysis of the literature. Med Intensiva. 2012; 36(7): 467–474.
  24. Hofkens PJ, Verrijcken A, Merveille K, et al. Common pitfalls and tips and tricks to get the most out of your transpulmonary thermodilution device: results of a survey and state-of-the-art review. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015; 47(2): 89–116.
  25. DiCorte CJ, Latham P, Creilich PE. Pulmonary artery catheter vs. espophageal doppler monitor: measurement of cardiac output and left vantricular filling during cardaic surgery. Anesth Analg. 1999; 88: 37SCA.
  26. Spiess BD, Patel MA, Soltow LO, et al. Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2001; 15(5): 567–573.
  27. Gu WJ, Wang F, Bakker J, et al. The effect of goal-directed therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis - earlier is better: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Care. 2014; 18(5): 570.