Tom 13, Nr 3 (2018)
CHOROBY STRUKTURALNE SERCA
Opublikowany online: 2018-08-01
Wyświetlenia strony
538
Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu
1470
Mechaniczna protekcja zatorowości mózgowej w TAVI
Kardiol Inwazyjna 2018;13(3):25-30.
Streszczenie
Ryzyko zdarzeń naczyniowo-mózgowych w ciągu 30 dni od zabiegu przezcewnikowej implantacji zastawki aortalnej (TAVI) wynosi około 5,5%. W dużym odsetku są one nieme klinicznie. Ryzyko zatorowości wiąże się z przejściem cewnikami przez zastawkę, predylatacją, pozycjonowaniem zastawki oraz jej uwolnieniem. Pociągnęło to za sobą rozwój nowych strategii mechanicznej ochrony mózgu przed potencjalnie zatorowym materiałem uwalnianym podczas zabiegów TAVI. Większość danych wskazuje, że stosowanie neuroprotekcji w zabiegach TAVI jest bezpieczne i znacznie zmniejsza liczbę zgonów lub udarów w porównaniu z grupami kontrolnymi bez protekcji mózgowej, niemniej aby udowodnić korzystną rolę neuroprotekcji podczas TAVI, potrzebne są dalsze, wieloośrodkowe, dobrze zaplanowane badania. Ochrona mózgu stanie się jeszcze ważniejsza, gdy wskazania do TAVI obejmą grupę pacjentów młodszych i/lub o niższym ryzyku zabiegowym.
Słowa kluczowe: transcatheter aortic valvae implantationcerebral embolismprotection devices
Referencje
- Zahn R, Gerckens U, Grube E, et al. German Transcatheter Aortic Valve Interventions-Registry Investigators. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: first results from a multi-centre real-world registry. Eur Heart J. 2011; 32(2): 198–204.
- Tamburino C, Capodanno D, Ramondo A, et al. Incidence and predictors of early and late mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 663 patients with severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2011; 123(3): 299–308.
- Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 1609–1620.
- Moat NE. Will TAVR Become the Predominant Method for Treating Severe Aortic Stenosis? N Engl J Med. 2016; 374(17): 1682–1683.
- Lansky AJ, Messé SR, Brickman AM, et al. Proposed Standardized Neurological Endpoints for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: An Academic Research Consortium Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69(6): 679–691.
- Muralidharan A, Thiagarajan K, Van Ham R, et al. Meta-Analysis of Perioperative Stroke and Mortality in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2016; 118(7): 1031–1045.
- Pagnesi M, Martino EA, Chiarito M, et al. Silent cerebral injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and the preventive role of embolic protection devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 221: 97–106.
- Vermeer SE, Prins ND, den Heijer T, et al. Silent brain infarcts and the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. N Engl J Med. 2003; 348(13): 1215–1222.
- Reardon MJ, Van Mieghem NM, Popma JJ, et al. SURTAVI Investigators. Surgical or Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(14): 1321–1331.
- Lansky AJ, Messé SR, Brickman AM, et al. Proposed Standardized Neurological Endpoints for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials: An Academic Research Consortium Initiative. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69(6): 679–691.
- Lansky AJ, Schofer J, Tchetche D, et al. A prospective randomized evaluation of the TriGuard™ HDH embolic DEFLECTion device during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: results from the DEFLECT III trial. Eur Heart J. 2015; 36(31): 2070–2078.
- Haussig S, Mangner N, Dwyer MG, et al. Effect of a Cerebral Protection Device on Brain Lesions Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The CLEAN-TAVI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016; 316(6): 592–601.
- Eggebrecht H, Schmermund A, Voigtländer T, et al. Risk of stroke after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI): a meta-analysis of 10,037 published patients. EuroIntervention. 2012; 8(1): 129–138.
- De Wit L, Theuns P, Dejaeger E, et al. Long-term impact of stroke on patients' health-related quality of life. Disabil Rehabil. 2017; 39(14): 1435–1440.
- Kahlert P, Knipp SC, Schlamann M, et al. Silent and apparent cerebral ischemia after percutaneous transfemoral aortic valve implantation: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study. Circulation. 2010; 121(7): 870–878.
- Kahlert P, Al-Rashid F, Döttger P, et al. Cerebral embolization during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a transcranial Doppler study. Circulation. 2012; 126(10): 1245–1255.
- Schmidt T, Akdag O, Wohlmuth P, et al. Histological Findings and Predictors of Cerebral Debris From Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The ALSTER Experience. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016; 5(11).
- Van Mieghem NM, van Gils L, Ahmad H, et al. Filter-based cerebral embolic protection with transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the randomised MISTRAL-C trial. EuroIntervention. 2016; 12(4): 499–507.
- Kapadia SR, Kodali S, Makkar R, et al. SENTINEL Trial Investigators. Protection Against Cerebral Embolism During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 69(4): 367–377.
- Naber CK, Ghanem A, Abizaid AA, et al. First-in-man use of a novel embolic protection device for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. EuroIntervention. 2012; 8(1): 43–50.
- Van Mieghem NM, Schipper MEI, Ladich E, et al. Histopathology of embolic debris captured during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 2013; 127(22): 2194–2201.
- Van Mieghem NM, El Faquir N, Rahhab Z, et al. Incidence and predictors of debris embolizing to the brain during transcatheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015; 8(5): 718–724.
- Pagnesi M, Martino EA, Chiarito M, et al. Silent cerebral injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation and the preventive role of embolic protection devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2016; 221: 97–106.
- Seeger J, Gonska B, Otto M, et al. Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Significantly Reduces Death and Stroke Compared With Unprotected Procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(22): 2297–2303.
- Hong JM, Chung CS, Bang OY, et al. Vertebral artery dominance contributes to basilar artery curvature and peri-vertebrobasilar junctional infarcts. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009; 80(10): 1087–1092.
- Van Gils L, Kroon H, Daemen J, et al. Complete filter-based cerebral embolic protection with transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018; 91(4): 790–797.
- Baumbach A, Mullen M, Brickman AM, et al. Safety and performance of a novel embolic deflection device in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: results from the DEFLECT I study. EuroIntervention. 2015; 11(1): 75–84.
- Lansky AJ, Brown D, Pena C, et al. Neurologic Complications of Unprotected Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (from the Neuro-TAVI Trial). Am J Cardiol. 2016; 118(10): 1519–1526.
- Fanning NF, Walters TD, Fox AJ, et al. Association between calcification of the cervical carotid artery bifurcation and white matter ischemia. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006; 27(2): 378–383.
- Stolker JM, Spertus JA, Cohen DJ, et al. Rethinking composite end points in clinical trials: insights from patients and trialists. Circulation. 2014; 130(15): 1254–1261.
- Daniel K, Wolfe CDA, Busch MA, et al. What are the social consequences of stroke for working-aged adults? A systematic review. Stroke. 2009; 40(6): e431–e440.
- Wendt D, Kleinbongard P, Knipp S, et al. Intraaortic protection from embolization in patients undergoing transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 100(2): 686–691.
