Tom 16, Nr 1 (2021)
Inne materiały uzgodnione z Redakcją
Opublikowany online: 2021-07-27
Wyświetlenia strony
221
Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu
23
Ocena czynnościowa po przezskórnej angioplastyce wieńcowej. Dlaczego taka istotna?
Kardiol Inwazyjna 2021;16(1):3-6.
Streszczenie
Cząstkowa rezerwa wieńcowa przepływu (FFR) lub spoczynkowy
pomiar gradientu ciśnień (NHPR) stanowią uznaną metodę
oceny istotności zwężenia tętnicy wieńcowej, jednak są nadal
niedoceniane w ocenie skuteczności przezskórnej interwencji
wieńcowej (PCI). Obie metody umożliwiają identyfikację rezydualnego
niedokrwienia po zabiegu PCI, które jest częstym
zjawiskiem, zwłaszcza w przypadku rozsianych zmian miażdżycowych.
Może ono być związane z suboptymalną implantacją
stentu jak również obecnością innych zwężeń proksymalnie
lub dystalnie do leczonej zmiany. Optymalizacja zabiegu pod
kontrolą oceny czynnościowej poprawia bezpośredni wynik
zabiegu oraz rokowanie odległe pacjentów.
Słowa kluczowe: cząstkowa rezerwa wieńcowa przepływuchoroba niedokrwienna sercaprzezskórna angioplastyka wieńcowa
Referencje
- Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996; 334(26): 1703–1708.
- Tonino PAL, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. FAME Study Investigators, FAME Study Investigators, FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(3): 213–224.
- De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, et al. FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012; 367(11): 991–1001.
- Pijls N, Schaardenburgh Pv, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Functionally Nonsignificant Stenosis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007; 49(21): 2105–2111.
- Johnson N, Tóth G, Lai D, et al. Prognostic Value of Fractional Flow Reserve. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014; 64(16): 1641–1654.
- Barbato E, Toth GG, Johnson NP, et al. A Prospective Natural History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis Using Fractional Flow Reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 68(21): 2247–2255.
- van Nunen LX, Zimmermann FM, Tonino PAL, et al. FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guidance of PCI in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (FAME): 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015; 386(10006): 1853–1860.
- Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). European Heart Journal. 2010; 31(20): 2501–2555.
- Li SJ, Ge Z, Kan J, et al. Cutoff Value and Long-Term Prediction of Clinical Events by FFR Measured Immediately After Implantation of a Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: 1- to 3-Year Results From the DKCRUSH VII Registry Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(10): 986–995.
- Piroth Z, Toth GG, Tonino PAL, et al. Prognostic Value of Fractional Flow Reserve Measured Immediately After Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017; 10(8).
- Hakeem A, Uretsky BF. Role of Postintervention Fractional Flow Reserve to Improve Procedural and Clinical Outcomes. Circulation. 2019; 139(5): 694–706.
- Hakeem A, Ghosh B, Shah K, et al. Incremental Prognostic Value of Post-Intervention Pd/Pa in Patients Undergoing Ischemia-Driven Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12(20): 2002–2014.
- Agarwal SK, Kasula S, Hacioglu Y, et al. Utilizing Post-Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve to Optimize Acute Results and the Relationship to Long-Term Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016; 9(10): 1022–1031.
- Samady H, McDaniel M, Veledar E, et al. Baseline fractional flow reserve and stent diameter predict optimal post-stent fractional flow reserve and major adverse cardiac events after bare-metal stent deployment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2(4): 357–363.
- Koning R, Eltchaninoff H, Commeau P, et al. BESMART (BeStent in Small Arteries) Trial Investigators. Stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty for small coronary arteries: in-hospital and 6-month clinical and angiographic results. Circulation. 2001; 104(14): 1604–1608.
- Mudra H, di Mario C, de Jaegere P, et al. OPTICUS (OPTimization with ICUS to reduce stent restenosis) Study Investigators. Randomized comparison of coronary stent implantation under ultrasound or angiographic guidance to reduce stent restenosis (OPTICUS Study). Circulation. 2001; 104(12): 1343–1349.
- Kasaoka S, Tobis JM, Akiyama T, et al. Angiographic and intravascular ultrasound predictors of in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998; 32(6): 1630–1635.
- Fitzgerald PJ, Oshima A, Hayase M, et al. Final results of the Can Routine Ultrasound Influence Stent Expansion (CRUISE) study. Circulation. 2000; 102(5): 523–530.
- Mintz GS, Popma JJ, Pichard AD, et al. Intravascular ultrasound predictors of restenosis after percutaneous transcatheter coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996; 27(7): 1678–1687.
- Hanekamp CE, Koolen JJ, Pijls NH, et al. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation. 1999; 99(8): 1015–1021.
- Fearon WF, Luna J, Samady H, et al. Fractional flow reserve compared with intravascular ultrasound guidance for optimizing stent deployment. Circulation. 2001; 104(16): 1917–1922.
- Pijls NHJ, Klauss V, Siebert U, et al. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Post-Stent Registry Investigators. Coronary pressure measurement after stenting predicts adverse events at follow-up: a multicenter registry. Circulation. 2002; 105(25): 2950–2954.
- Kimura Yo, Tanaka N, Okura H, et al. Characterization of real-world patients with low fractional flow reserve immediately after drug-eluting stents implantation. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2016; 31(1): 29–37.
- Baranauskas A, Peace A, Kibarskis A, et al. FFR result post PCI is suboptimal in long diffuse coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention. 2016; 12(12): 1473–1480.
