Shortcuts

open access

Vol 15, No 1 (2017)
Prace oryginalne (nadesłane)
Get Citation

The significance of the quality of communication for the sexual satisfaction of women and men in close relationships of different length

Agnieszka Nomejko, Grażyna Dolińska-Zygmunt, Anna Mucha
Seksuologia Polska 2017;15(1).

open access

Vol 15, No 1 (2017)
Prace oryginalne (nadesłane)

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The main objective of the research results presented in the article is to demonstrate the significance of the quality of intimate relationships for sexual satisfaction. We have strived to determine to what extent the length of close relationship differentiates the level of sexual satisfaction among men and women and also what is the link between the quality of communication in a close relationship and the sexual satisfaction of women and men with the consideration of the duration of their relationship.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have examined 467 people aged 20–70. In the study we have employed The Marital and Partnership Communication Questionnaire by Kaźmierczak and Plopy, as well as The Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire by Nomejko and Dolińska-Zygmunt.

RESULTS: The research has indicated that the sexual satisfaction of the study group was higher, the shorter was the duration of their relationship. The relationship between variables was not strong. Additionally, it has been evidenced that sexual satisfaction has a significant correlation with the quality of communication in a close relationship and its dimensions. The importance of this variable for the satisfaction with sexual life has increased with the length of a relationship, especially in terms of depreciation and commitment. We have also observed substantial gender differences.

CONCLUSIONS: The quality of a close relationship including the quality of communication between partners is essential for the satisfaction with sexual life, especially among women. High communication skills of both partners may compensate for negative phenomena influencing their sexual life which occur in lengthening relationships, thereby they allow to maintain a high level of sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The main objective of the research results presented in the article is to demonstrate the significance of the quality of intimate relationships for sexual satisfaction. We have strived to determine to what extent the length of close relationship differentiates the level of sexual satisfaction among men and women and also what is the link between the quality of communication in a close relationship and the sexual satisfaction of women and men with the consideration of the duration of their relationship.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: We have examined 467 people aged 20–70. In the study we have employed The Marital and Partnership Communication Questionnaire by Kaźmierczak and Plopy, as well as The Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire by Nomejko and Dolińska-Zygmunt.

RESULTS: The research has indicated that the sexual satisfaction of the study group was higher, the shorter was the duration of their relationship. The relationship between variables was not strong. Additionally, it has been evidenced that sexual satisfaction has a significant correlation with the quality of communication in a close relationship and its dimensions. The importance of this variable for the satisfaction with sexual life has increased with the length of a relationship, especially in terms of depreciation and commitment. We have also observed substantial gender differences.

CONCLUSIONS: The quality of a close relationship including the quality of communication between partners is essential for the satisfaction with sexual life, especially among women. High communication skills of both partners may compensate for negative phenomena influencing their sexual life which occur in lengthening relationships, thereby they allow to maintain a high level of sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships.

Get Citation

Keywords

sexual satisfaction, length of close relationship, quality of communication in a close relationship

About this article
Title

The significance of the quality of communication for the sexual satisfaction of women and men in close relationships of different length

Journal

Seksuologia Polska (Polish Sexology)

Issue

Vol 15, No 1 (2017)

Bibliographic record

Seksuologia Polska 2017;15(1).

Keywords

sexual satisfaction
length of close relationship
quality of communication in a close relationship

Authors

Agnieszka Nomejko
Grażyna Dolińska-Zygmunt
Anna Mucha

References (28)
  1. DeLamater J, Karraker A. Sexual functioning in older adults. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2009; 11(1): 6–11.
  2. Rosen RC, Bachmann GA. Sexual well-being, happiness, and satisfaction, in women: the case for a new conceptual paradigm. J Sex Marital Ther. 2008; 34(4): 291–297; discussion 298.
  3. Rehman U. Sexual well-being. In: Tolman D. ed. American Psychological Association handbook of sexuality and psychology. APA Handbooks of Sexuality, Washington 2014.
  4. Kuczyńska A. Koncepcja jakości życia w psychoseksuologii. Psychologiczne aspekty funkcjonowania w rodzinie. Prace Psychologiczne XXIV. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego, Wrocław 1992.
  5. Kuczyńska A, Kaczmarek I. Doświadczenia seksualne, satysfakcja z życia seksualnego a jakość związku. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne. 2001; 1: 1–26.
  6. Nęcki Z. Wzajemna atrakcyjność. Wydawnictwo Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa 1990.
  7. Gossmann I, Julien D, Chartrand E. Determinants of sex initiation frequencies and sexual satisfaction in long- term couples relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 2003; 12: 169–181.
  8. Meltzer AL, McNulty JK. Body image and marital satisfaction: evidence for the mediating role of sexual frequency and sexual satisfaction. J Fam Psychol. 2010; 24(2): 156–164.
  9. McCarthy B, Wald L. Sexual desire and satisfaction: The balance between individual and couple factors. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2012; 27(4): 310–321.
  10. Izdebski Z. Seksualność Polaków na początku XXI wieku. Studium Badawcze. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. 2012; Kraków.
  11. Lawrance KS, Byers E. Sexual satisfaction In long term relationships: The interpersonal Exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships . 1995(2): 267–285.
  12. Sánchez-Fuentes M, Santos-Iglesias P, Sierra J. A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2014; 14(1): 67–75.
  13. Kuczyńska A. Sposób na bliski związek. Wydawnictwo Instytutu Psychologii PAN, Warszawa 1998.
  14. Haavio- Mannila E., Kontula O. What increases sexual satisfaction? Archives of sexual behavior. 1997; 26: 1–30.
  15. Wojciszke B. Psychologia miłości. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk 2005.
  16. Snarch D. Problemy dotyczące pożadania. Perspektywa systemowa. In: Leiblum S, Rosen R. ed. Terapia zaburzeń seksualnych. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne, Gdańsk 20005.
  17. Impett EA, Muise A, Peregine D. Sexuality in the context of relationships. In: Tolman D, Diamond L. ed. American Psychological Association Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology tom 1 Person based Approaches. APA Handbook of Sexuality, Washington 2014.
  18. Birnie-Porter C, Hunt M. Does relationship status matter for sexual satisfaction? The roles of intimacy and attachment avoidance in sexual satisfaction across five types of ongoing sexual relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality. 2015; 24(2): 174–183.
  19. Hess JA, Coffelt TA. Verbal communication about sex in marriage: patterns of language use and its connection with relational outcomes. J Sex Res. 2012; 49(6): 603–612.
  20. Nomejko A, Dolińska-Zygmunt G. The Sexual Satisfaction Questionnaire – psychometric properties. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology. 2014; 12(3): 105–112.
  21. Kaźmierczak M, Plopa M. Komunikacja w bliskich związkach. Teoria i metoda badania. Vizja Press & IT, Warszawa 2012.
  22. Dolińska-Zygmunt G. Nomejko, A. Sexual satisfaction's contribution to a sense of quality of life in early adulthood. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology. 2011; 9: 65–73.
  23. Nomejko A, Zygmunt GD. Psycho-social determinants of sexual satisfaction in young, middle and late adulthood. Polish Journal of Applied Psychology. 2015; 13(2).
  24. Higgins JA, Mullinax M, Trussell J, et al. Sexual satisfaction and sexual health among university students in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2011; 101(9): 1643–1654.
  25. Laumann EO, Paik A, Glasser DB, et al. A cross-national study of subjective sexual well-being among older women and men: findings from the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Arch Sex Behav. 2006; 35(2): 145–161.
  26. DeLamater J, Hyde JS, Fong MC. Sexual satisfaction in the seventh decade of life. J Sex Marital Ther. 2008; 34(5): 439–454.
  27. Heszen I, Sęk H. Psychologia Zdrowia. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2008.
  28. Beisert M. W poszukiwaniu modelu seksualności człowieka . In: Beisert M. ed. Seksualność w cyklu życia człowieka. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa 2006.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

Wydawcą serwisu jest  Via Medica sp. z o.o. sp. komandytowa, ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail:  viamedica@viamedica.pl