Pretreatment CT and PET Radiomics Predicting Rectal Cancer Patients in Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to characterize pre-treatment non-contrast computed tomography (CT) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) based radiomics signatures predictive of pathological response and clinical outcomes in rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT).
Material and methods: An exploratory analysis was performed using pre-treatment non-contrast CT and PET imaging dataset. The association of tumor regression grade (TRG) and neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score with pre-treatment CT and PET features was assessed using machine learning algorithms. Three separate predictive models were built for composite features from CT + PET.
Results: The patterns of pathological response were TRG 0 (n = 13; 19.7%), 1 (n = 34; 51.5%), 2 (n = 16; 24.2%), and 3 (n = 3; 4.5%). There were 20 (30.3%) patients with low, 22 (33.3%) with intermediate and 24 (36.4%) with high NAR scores. Three separate predictive models were built for composite features from CT + PET and analyzed separately for clinical endpoints. Composite features with α = 0.2 resulted in the best predictive power using logistic regression. For pathological response prediction, the signature resulted in 88.1% accuracy in predicting TRG 0 vs. TRG 1–3; 91% accuracy in predicting TRG 0–1 vs. TRG 2–3. For the surrogate of DFS and OS, it resulted in 67.7% accuracy in predicting low vs. intermediate vs. high NAR scores.
Conclusion: The pre-treatment composite radiomics signatures were highly predictive of pathological response in rectal cancer treated with NACRT. A larger cohort is warranted for further validation.
Keywords: rectal cancerCTPETradiomicsneoadjuvant chemoradiation therapypathologic response
References
- Smith CA, Kachnic LA. Evolving Treatment Paradigm in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018; 16(7): 909–915.
- Xu Y, Hosny A, Zeleznik R, et al. Deep Learning Predicts Lung Cancer Treatment Response from Serial Medical Imaging. Clin Cancer Res. 2019; 25(11): 3266–3275.
- Jin X, Zheng X, Chen D, et al. Prediction of response after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer using a combination of dosimetry and CT radiomics. Eur Radiol. 2019; 29(11): 6080–6088.
- Mouraviev A, Detsky J, Sahgal A, et al. Use of radiomics for the prediction of local control of brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery. Neuro Oncol. 2020; 22(6): 797–805.
- Li P, Wang X, Xu C, et al. (18)F-FDG PET/CT radiomic predictors of pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020; 47(5): 1116–1126.
- Lambin P. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012; 48(4): 441–4466.
- De Cecco CN, Ganeshan B, Ciolina M, et al. Texture analysis as imaging biomarker of tumoral response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients studied with 3-T magnetic resonance. Invest Radiol. 2015; 50(4): 239–245.
- Cusumano D, Dinapoli N, Boldrini L, et al. Fractal-based radiomic approach to predict complete pathological response after chemo-radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Radiol Med. 2018; 123(4): 286–295.
- Lovinfosse P, Polus M, Van Daele D, et al. FDG PET/CT radiomics for predicting the outcome of locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018; 45(3): 365–375.
- Bundschuh RA, Dinges J, Neumann L, et al. Textural Parameters of Tumor Heterogeneity in ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for Therapy Response Assessment and Prognosis in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. J Nucl Med. 2014; 55(6): 891–897.
- George TJ, Allegra CJ, Yothers G. Neoadjuvant Rectal (NAR) Score: a New Surrogate Endpoint in Rectal Cancer Clinical Trials. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2015; 11(5): 275–280.
- Giannini V, Mazzetti S, Bertotto I, et al. Predicting locally advanced rectal cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy with (18)F-FDG PET and MRI radiomics features. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019; 46(4): 878–888.
- Yuan Z, Frazer M, Zhang GG, et al. CT-based radiomic features to predict pathological response in rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2020; 64(3): 444–449.
- Scalco E, Rizzo G. Texture analysis of medical images for radiotherapy applications. Br J Radiol. 2017; 90(1070): 20160642.
- Castellano G, Bonilha L, Li LM, et al. Texture analysis of medical images. Clin Radiol. 2004; 59(12): 1061–1069.
- Cortes C, Mohri M. Confidence intervals for the area under the ROC curve. In: Saul L, Weiss Y, Bottou L. ed. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2005. NIPS 2004 .