open access

Vol 11, No 2 (2006)
Original papers
Published online: 2006-01-01
Submitted: 2005-06-07
Get Citation

Dynamic wedges – dosimetry and quality control

Krzysztof Chełmiński, Wojciech Bulski, Joanna Rostkowska, Małgorzata Kania
DOI: 10.1016/S1507-1367(06)71050-1
·
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2006;11(2):67-75.

open access

Vol 11, No 2 (2006)
Original papers
Published online: 2006-01-01
Submitted: 2005-06-07

Abstract

Background

Modern medical accelerators are usually equipped with a dynamic wedge option. It is a form of dose-rate modulation which makes use of the dynamic movement pairs of collimator jaws. Dynamic wedges may replace physical wedges but their use requires more complex dosimetry and quality control procedures. Film dosimetry has been proposed as a quality control tool in dynamic dose distribution. We present examples of extensive systematic calculation errors which were detected during complex dosimetry quality control procedures in two treatment planning systems.

Aim

The aim, in presenting QA procedures and examples of systematic errors which were detected and corrected, is to focus attention on the QA of dynamic accessories used in TPS before they are used in the clinical practice. This is an important issue which may have been frequently overlooked as the configuration of dynamic wedges in many treatment planning systems requires no dose measurement data. Measurements of verifications are often, overlooked.

Materials/Methods

Dynamic wedge dose distributions were generated by Clinac 2300 C/D accelerators (Varian) for beam energies of 6 and 15 MV. Measurements were performed with LA48 linear array of ionization chambers (PTW), and with dosimetric films X-Omat V and EDR-2 (Kodak). The dosimetric characteristics of the film were examined for a wide range of dose values and beam parameters. The results of the measurements were compared with dose distribution calculations produced by the treatment planning systems Helax and CadPlan/Eclipse.

Results

The initial results showed considerable differences between measurements and calculations. Larger differences were observed for larger wedge angles and lower energies. On the basis of these results, TPS manufacturers were able to tune their calculation algorithms which effectively reduced the observed differences from a level of −5.5% and −8% (for 15 and 6 MV respectively) for 60° wedges to a level of ±2% for the Helax system.

Conclusions

A comprehensive quality control procedure for a broad range of dynamic wedge parameters, on a Clinac 2300C/D, made it possible to achieve an improved agreement between measured and calculated results in radiotherapy. Such measurement procedures should be included in the recommendations for periodic quality control tests of accelerators.

Abstract

Background

Modern medical accelerators are usually equipped with a dynamic wedge option. It is a form of dose-rate modulation which makes use of the dynamic movement pairs of collimator jaws. Dynamic wedges may replace physical wedges but their use requires more complex dosimetry and quality control procedures. Film dosimetry has been proposed as a quality control tool in dynamic dose distribution. We present examples of extensive systematic calculation errors which were detected during complex dosimetry quality control procedures in two treatment planning systems.

Aim

The aim, in presenting QA procedures and examples of systematic errors which were detected and corrected, is to focus attention on the QA of dynamic accessories used in TPS before they are used in the clinical practice. This is an important issue which may have been frequently overlooked as the configuration of dynamic wedges in many treatment planning systems requires no dose measurement data. Measurements of verifications are often, overlooked.

Materials/Methods

Dynamic wedge dose distributions were generated by Clinac 2300 C/D accelerators (Varian) for beam energies of 6 and 15 MV. Measurements were performed with LA48 linear array of ionization chambers (PTW), and with dosimetric films X-Omat V and EDR-2 (Kodak). The dosimetric characteristics of the film were examined for a wide range of dose values and beam parameters. The results of the measurements were compared with dose distribution calculations produced by the treatment planning systems Helax and CadPlan/Eclipse.

Results

The initial results showed considerable differences between measurements and calculations. Larger differences were observed for larger wedge angles and lower energies. On the basis of these results, TPS manufacturers were able to tune their calculation algorithms which effectively reduced the observed differences from a level of −5.5% and −8% (for 15 and 6 MV respectively) for 60° wedges to a level of ±2% for the Helax system.

Conclusions

A comprehensive quality control procedure for a broad range of dynamic wedge parameters, on a Clinac 2300C/D, made it possible to achieve an improved agreement between measured and calculated results in radiotherapy. Such measurement procedures should be included in the recommendations for periodic quality control tests of accelerators.

Get Citation

Keywords

EDW; Dynamic wedge; Treatment planning systems; film dosimetry

About this article
Title

Dynamic wedges – dosimetry and quality control

Journal

Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy

Issue

Vol 11, No 2 (2006)

Pages

67-75

Published online

2006-01-01

DOI

10.1016/S1507-1367(06)71050-1

Bibliographic record

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2006;11(2):67-75.

Keywords

EDW
Dynamic wedge
Treatment planning systems
film dosimetry

Authors

Krzysztof Chełmiński
Wojciech Bulski
Joanna Rostkowska
Małgorzata Kania

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: journals@viamedica.pl