Vol 82, No 6 (2024)
Clinical vignette
Published online: 2024-05-16

open access

Page views 425
Article views/downloads 297
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Nearly half a century of cardiac pacing evolution: A patient’s journey through epicardial, transvenous, and leadless pacemakers

Bartłomiej Wróbel12, Mariusz Wójcik12, Jakub Karpiak1, Andrzej Przybylski12
Pubmed: 38767168
Pol Heart J 2024;82(6):676-678.

Abstract

Not available

CLINICAL VIGNETTE

Nearly half a century of cardiac pacing evolution: A patient’s journey through epicardial, transvenous, and leadless pacemakers

Bartłomiej Wróbel12Mariusz Wójcik12Jakub Karpiak1Andrzej Przybylski12
1Clinical Department of Cardiology with the Acute Coronary Syndromes Subdivision, Clinical Provincial Hospital No. 2 in Rzeszow, Rzeszów, Poland
2College of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszów, Poland

Correspondence to:

Bartłomiej Wróbel, MD,

Clinical Department of Cardiology

with the Acute Coronary Syndromes Subdivision,

Clinical Hospital No. 2 in Rzeszow,

Lwowska 60, 35–301 Rzeszów, Poland,

phone: +48 17 866 44 55,

e-mail: barwro89@gmail.com

Copyright by the Author(s), 2024

DOI: 10.33963/v.phj.100679

Received: April 6, 2024

Accepted: May 12, 2024

Early publication date: May 16, 2024

This case report presents a medical history of a 64-year-old man. It dates back to 1976 when he underwent surgery for an atrial septal defect complicated by a persistent third-degree heart block. During the initial surgical intervention, he received a permanent pacemaker with epicardial leads, positioned abdominally. However, three years later, due to an exit block, he required implantation of a transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacemaker, repositioned in the pectoral region. Over the ensuing years, he underwent 5 replacements of the pulse generator. In 2023, he was admitted to the cardiology ward for a pocket infection resulting in pocket erosion. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography revealed preserved ejection fraction (EF ~60%) and ruled out the presence of bacterial vegetation or severe valvular defects. Additionally, his medical history included persistent atrial fibrillation and hypertension.

The patient underwent transvenous lead extraction utilizing a Liberator Beacon Tip Locking Stylet, steel sheath, and an 11 Fr Evolution RL Controlled-Rotation Dilatator Sheath Set (Cook Vandergrift, Vandergrift, PA, US). During the procedure, a small segment of the ventricular electrode remained (<2 cm). Fluoroscopy indicated damaged epicardial leads. Subsequently, temporary cardiac pacing was initiated using an active fixation lead via jugular access, with the pulse generator positioned externally. Fortunately, no procedure-related complications were encountered.

Given the patient’s good tolerance of right ventricular stimulation and previous pocket infection, a decision was made to implant a leadless pacemaker. The AVEIR VR (Abbott Cardiovascular, Plymouth, MN, US) leadless pacemaker, was selected (Figure 1CD). The procedure, conducted via the standard right femoral approach with Amplatz Super Stiff, AVEIR Catheter RV, and Aveir Introducer 25F, proceeded uneventfully [1]. Upon reaching the right ventricle, ventriculography was performed to confirm optimal positioning (Supplementary material, Videos S1S2). Once satisfactory parameters (sensing, impedance, threshold, and current of injury) were attained, the pacemaker was released (Supplementary material, Video S3). Following removal of the delivery and introducer sheaths, the venous access site was sutured. Post-procedurally, no complications were observed, and the patient was discharged the following day (Figure 1AB) [2].

Figure 1. AB. X-ray in the posteroanterior view and the lateral view presenting AVEIR VR (white arrows), fractured epicardial lead encased by calcification (yellow arrows) and the retained part of the ventricular lead (red arrows). C. Fluoroscopy in right anterior oblique position. D. Fluoroscopy in left anterior oblique position, (AVEIR VR with the delivery system)

At the 1-month follow-up, the device demonstrated stable parameters, including a pacing threshold of 0.75 V @0.2 ms, R-wave >18 mV, and impedance of 710 ohms, with a ventricular stimulation percentage of 100% upon interrogation. The expected time until battery replacement was estimated to be approximately 14 years. Notably, no symptoms of heart failure were reported, and transthoracic echocardiography revealed intact left ventricular ejection fraction (EF ~60%) and no valvular defects.

Leadless pacemakers represent a valuable alternative to traditional transvenous systems, offering stable and secure pacing, particularly in patients at high risk of pocket infection or with limited venous access [3, 4]. This type of stimulation features a reduced risk of cardiovascular implantable electronic device-related infection and allows a safe and feasible implantation procedure at the time of or within a short period after transvenous lead extraction, which may support the patient for a lifetime, especially in the case of pacemaker dependency. This case highlights our patient’s long journey through various modes of cardiac stimulation, mirroring the evolution of pacemaker technology. The treatment employed in this patient may be a cost-effective option for patients at high risk of infection related to cardiovascular implantable electronic devices [5].

Supplementary material

Supplementary material is available at https://journals.viamedica.pl/polish_heart_journal.

Article information

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Funding: None.

Open access: This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, which allows downloading and sharing articles with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially. For commercial use, please contact the journal office at polishheartjournal@ptkardio.pl

REFERENCES

  1. Laczay B, Aguilera J, Cantillon DJ. Leadless cardiac ventricular pacing using helix fixation: Step-by-step guide to implantation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023; 34(3): 748759, doi: 10.1111/jce.15785, indexed in Pubmed: 36542756.
  2. Garg J, Shah K, Bhardwaj R, et al. Adverse events associated with Aveir VR leadless pacemaker: A Food and Drug Administration MAUDE database study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2023; 34(6): 14691471, doi: 10.1111/jce.15932, indexed in Pubmed: 37209414.
  3. Kempa M, Mitkowski P, Kowalski O, et al. Expert opinion of a Working Group on Leadless Pacing appointed by the National Consultant in Cardiology and the Board of the Heart Rhythm Section of the Polish Cardiac Society. Kardiol Pol. 2021; 79(5): 604608, doi: 10.33963/KP.15982, indexed in Pubmed: 34125944.
  4. Reddy VY, Exner DV, Doshi R, et al. Primary results on safety and efficacy from the LEADLESS II-phase 2 worldwide clinical trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022; 8(1): 115117, doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.11.002, indexed in Pubmed: 34863657.
  5. Syska P, Farkowski MM, Raulinajtys-Grzybek M, et al. How to decrease the cost of pacemaker infection treatment by adopting seemingly costly innovation? A budget impact analysis of a leadless pacemaker implantation. Kardiol Pol. 2022; 80(12): 12601262, doi: 10.33963/KP.a2022.0284, indexed in Pubmed: 36573599.