open access
Lessons learned from self-efficacy of healthcare professionals for advance care planning
- ATLANTES Global Observatory of Palliative Care, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
- Instituto Pallium Latinoamérica, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Institute of Medical Research A Lanari, University of Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Clínica Reina Fabiola, Córdoba, Argentina
- National University of La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Hospital Cosme Argerich, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Instituto Catalán de Oncología, Barcelona, Spain
- Asociacion Espanola de Planificacion Compartida de la Atencion (AEPCA), Barcelona, Spain
open access
Abstract
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is a reflective, deliberative, and structured process based on dialogue and free agreement between the person concerned and healthcare professionals. Argentina has no national ACP program or systematic approach for patients diagnosed with advanced chronic disease. Healthcare providers who treat these patients highlight some main obstacles in initiating the ACP process. Perceived self-efficacy is one of the main predictors of success in learning processes and promotes the acquisition of new behaviours and positive results in implementing ACP. The aim was to sensitise professionals and explore their self-efficacy for ACP before specific training.
Participants and methods: This exploratory, prospective, descriptive study used the self-efficacy ACP-SEs scale already validated in Argentina. Surveyed were 236 healthcare professionals (n 125 physicians/n 111 non-physicians) before specific training courses (2019–2021).
Results: Participants’ experience, training needs, and practices. Most respondents were females (43 years old). Non-physicians (n 111) were 40 nurses, 32 psychologists, 16 social workers, 15 physiotherapists, and 8 other health backgrounds. Over 50% had 5–20 years of professional and primary care experience. When comparing professions, half of the physicians increased by up to 5.23 points higher on the self-efficacy scale than non-physicians. Most participants had no personal advance directives and neither helped a relative nor a patient sign a document. Half of the participants had previously undergone training. Half of the professionals who had done ACP significantly increased their value on the scale by up to 7.5 points more than those who did not. Differences between physicians and non-physicians revealed areas of improvement involving communication skills, roles and tasks, and legal issues.
Conclusions: Healthcare providers’ skills improve with experience and require training to increase self-- efficacy. The following findings should encourage tailor-made training programs in the future. One of the goals of this study was to spark discussions before specific training courses and develop appropriate teaching methods based on perceived self-efficacy in Argentina.
Abstract
Background: Advance care planning (ACP) is a reflective, deliberative, and structured process based on dialogue and free agreement between the person concerned and healthcare professionals. Argentina has no national ACP program or systematic approach for patients diagnosed with advanced chronic disease. Healthcare providers who treat these patients highlight some main obstacles in initiating the ACP process. Perceived self-efficacy is one of the main predictors of success in learning processes and promotes the acquisition of new behaviours and positive results in implementing ACP. The aim was to sensitise professionals and explore their self-efficacy for ACP before specific training.
Participants and methods: This exploratory, prospective, descriptive study used the self-efficacy ACP-SEs scale already validated in Argentina. Surveyed were 236 healthcare professionals (n 125 physicians/n 111 non-physicians) before specific training courses (2019–2021).
Results: Participants’ experience, training needs, and practices. Most respondents were females (43 years old). Non-physicians (n 111) were 40 nurses, 32 psychologists, 16 social workers, 15 physiotherapists, and 8 other health backgrounds. Over 50% had 5–20 years of professional and primary care experience. When comparing professions, half of the physicians increased by up to 5.23 points higher on the self-efficacy scale than non-physicians. Most participants had no personal advance directives and neither helped a relative nor a patient sign a document. Half of the participants had previously undergone training. Half of the professionals who had done ACP significantly increased their value on the scale by up to 7.5 points more than those who did not. Differences between physicians and non-physicians revealed areas of improvement involving communication skills, roles and tasks, and legal issues.
Conclusions: Healthcare providers’ skills improve with experience and require training to increase self-- efficacy. The following findings should encourage tailor-made training programs in the future. One of the goals of this study was to spark discussions before specific training courses and develop appropriate teaching methods based on perceived self-efficacy in Argentina.
Keywords
palliative care, shared care planning, health care education, self-efficacy, advance care planning
Title
Lessons learned from self-efficacy of healthcare professionals for advance care planning
Journal
Palliative Medicine in Practice
Issue
Article type
Research paper
Pages
15-22
Published online
2023-07-10
Page views
336
Article views/downloads
235
DOI
Bibliographic record
Palliat Med Pract 2024;18(1):15-22.
Keywords
palliative care
shared care planning
health care education
self-efficacy
advance care planning
Authors
Vilma Adriana Tripodoro
María Stella Di Gennaro
Julia Fila
Verónica Inés Veloso
Celeste Quiroga
Cristina Lasmarías Martínez
- Rietjens JAC, Sudore RL, Connolly M, et al. European Association for Palliative Care. Definition and recommendations for advance care planning: an international consensus supported by the European Association for Palliative Care. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(9): e543–e551.
- Lasmarías C, Júdez J, Pérez de Lucas N, Fernández J. Claves en la planificación compartida de la atención. Del diálogo al documento. Monografía SECPAL sobre.
- Lasmarías C, Subirana-Casacuberta M, Mancho N, et al. Spanish cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the advance care planning self-efficacy: a cross-sectional study. J Palliat Med. 2021; 24(12): 1807–1815.
- Minto F, Strickland K. Anticipating emotion: a qualitative study of advance care planning in the community setting. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2011; 17(6): 278–284.
- Granero-Moya N, Frías-Osuna A, Barrio-Cantalejo IM, et al. [Primary care nurses' difficulties in advance care planning processes: A qualitative study]. Aten Primaria. 2016; 48(10): 649–656.
- Simon J, Porterfield P, Bouchal SR, et al. 'Not yet' and 'Just ask': barriers and facilitators to advance care planning – a qualitative descriptive study of the perspectives of seriously ill, older patients and their families. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015; 5(1): 54–62.
- Aradilla-Herrero A, Tomás-Sabado J, Gómez-Benito J. Death attitudes and emotional intelligence in nursing students. Omega (Westport). 2012; 66(1): 39–55.
- De Vleminck A, Houttekier D, Pardon K, et al. Barriers and facilitators for general practitioners to engage in advance care planning: a systematic review. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013; 31(4): 215–226.
- De Vleminck A, Pardon K, Beernaert K, et al. Barriers to advance care planning in cancer, heart failure and dementia patients: a focus group study on general practitioners' views and experiences. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1): e84905.
- Killackey T, Peter E, Maciver J, et al. Advance care planning with chronically ill patients: A relational autonomy approach. Nurs Ethics. 2020; 27(2): 360–371.
- Gómez-Vírseda C, de Maeseneer Y, Gastmans C. Relational autonomy in end-of-life care ethics: a contextualized approach to real-life complexities. BMC Med Ethics. 2020; 21(1): 50.
- Lasmarías C, Aradilla-Herrero A, Esquinas C, et al. Primary care professionals' self-efficacy surrounding advance care planning and its link to sociodemographics, background and perceptions: a cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(17).
- Barutta J, Vollmann J. Advance directives in Latin America. An ethical analysis with a focus on Argentina. Revista Latinoamericana Bioética. 2013; 13(1): 80–87.
- Gracia D. The intellectual basis of bioethics in Southern European countries. Bioethics. 1993; 7(2-3): 97–107.
- Ley de derecho del paciente, historia clínica y consentimiento informado. 26.742 May 24, 2012. https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/70105/20120524 (26.05.2023).
- Macchi M, Pérez M, Alonso J. Planificación de los cuidados en el final de la vida. Perspectivas de profesionales de oncología y cuidados paliativos. Sexualidad, Salud y Sociedad (Rio de Janeiro). 2020(35): 218–236.
- Hjorth NE, Hufthammer KO, Sigurdardottir K, et al. ERANet-LAC CODE project group, Core scientific group. Hospital care for the dying patient with cancer: does an advance care planning invitation influence bereaved relatives' experiences? A two country survey. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 [Epub ahead of print].
- Canto y Rodriguez J. Autoeficacia y educación. Educacion y Ciencia. 1998; 2: 45–53.
- Baughman KR, Ludwick R, Fischbein R, et al. Development of a scale to assess physician advance care planning self-efficacy. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017; 34(5): 435–441.
- Triodoro EV. Autoeficacia de los rofesionales en el roceso de Planificación Comartida de la Atención: Validación de Escala ACP–SES en Argentina. In: Paliat M. Editor. Resúmenes de comunicaciones óster.Triodoro EV. ed. 2023 p : 1–35.
- Haidet P, Levine RE, Parmelee DX, et al. Perspective: guidelines for reporting team-based learning activities in the medical and health sciences education literature. Acad Med. 2012; 87(3): 292–299.
- Vermorgen M, De Vleminck A, Deliens L, et al. Do physicians discuss end-of-life decisions with family members? A mortality follow-back study. Patient Educ Couns. 2018; 101(8): 1378–1384.
- Vandenbogaerde I, Miranda R, De Bleecker JL, et al. Advance care planning in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): study protocol for a qualitative longitudinal study with persons with ALS and their family carers. BMJ Open. 2022; 12(5): e060451.
- Assessing the development of palliative care worldwide: a set of actionable indicators. World Health Organization; 2021. https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=23dyEAAAQBAJ (26.05.2023).