open access

Vol 16, No 2 (2022)
Research paper
Published online: 2022-01-13
Get Citation

Palliative sedation at home: A medical act practicable everywhere

Grazia Armento1, Alessandro Parisi2, Giulio Ravoni3, Giuseppe Spinelli3, Vincenza Cofini4, Stefano Necozione4, Lucilla Verna5, Giampiero Porzio23
·
Palliat Med Pract 2022;16(2):86-92.
Affiliations
  1. Campus Bio-Medico University, via Alvaro del Portillo, 15, 00158 Rome, Italy
  2. Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila
  3. Tuscany Tumors Association, Florence
  4. Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L’Aquila
  5. Medical Oncology, St. Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila

open access

Vol 16, No 2 (2022)
Research paper
Published online: 2022-01-13

Abstract

Background: Few studies regarding palliative sedation (PS) have been carried out in-home care (HC)
setting. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of PS and its associated factors for end-of-life cancer
patients sedated at home in a single institution for 12 months.
Patients and methods: A retrospective study was carried out by the Tuscany Tumour Association including
adult patients with a diagnosis of onco-haematologic disease, who had undergone palliative
sedation at home (HPS) or not (non-HPS), in one year. Sociodemographic variables (sex and age) and
clinical variables (primary tumour location, active treatment (AT) or best supportive care at the time of
palliative sedation, causes of sedation, duration of sedation) were gathered from the clinical histories
of the cohort of patients died at home.
Results: From January to December 2018, 591 died at home mean age was 74 years ± 14 years, 311
(52%) patients were males, and 246 (42%) were still on AT. 110 (19%) received HPS. Dyspnoea (52%)
and delirium (42%) were the main refractory symptoms leading to HPS. Univariate analysis showed
a significant difference between HPS and non-HPS patients according to age and gender with younger
(χ2 = 2.8, p = 0.0043) male (χ2 = 5.5, p = 0.019) patients more likely to undergo PS. Furthermore,
adjusted odds ratios for each tumour showed that the risk of sedation was lower among patients with
gastrointestinal cancer (OR adj = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.37–0.94), and higher for patients with melanoma (OR
adj = 5.36; 95% CI: 1.35–21.24).
Conclusions: This study confirms the feasibility and the important role as a therapeutic tool played
by HPS in advanced cancer patients. It underlines the importance to pay particular attention to those
patients more likely to undergo HPS (i.e. younger, males and/or melanoma patients), limiting useless or
detrimental end-of-life antineoplastic treatments.

Abstract

Background: Few studies regarding palliative sedation (PS) have been carried out in-home care (HC)
setting. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of PS and its associated factors for end-of-life cancer
patients sedated at home in a single institution for 12 months.
Patients and methods: A retrospective study was carried out by the Tuscany Tumour Association including
adult patients with a diagnosis of onco-haematologic disease, who had undergone palliative
sedation at home (HPS) or not (non-HPS), in one year. Sociodemographic variables (sex and age) and
clinical variables (primary tumour location, active treatment (AT) or best supportive care at the time of
palliative sedation, causes of sedation, duration of sedation) were gathered from the clinical histories
of the cohort of patients died at home.
Results: From January to December 2018, 591 died at home mean age was 74 years ± 14 years, 311
(52%) patients were males, and 246 (42%) were still on AT. 110 (19%) received HPS. Dyspnoea (52%)
and delirium (42%) were the main refractory symptoms leading to HPS. Univariate analysis showed
a significant difference between HPS and non-HPS patients according to age and gender with younger
(χ2 = 2.8, p = 0.0043) male (χ2 = 5.5, p = 0.019) patients more likely to undergo PS. Furthermore,
adjusted odds ratios for each tumour showed that the risk of sedation was lower among patients with
gastrointestinal cancer (OR adj = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.37–0.94), and higher for patients with melanoma (OR
adj = 5.36; 95% CI: 1.35–21.24).
Conclusions: This study confirms the feasibility and the important role as a therapeutic tool played
by HPS in advanced cancer patients. It underlines the importance to pay particular attention to those
patients more likely to undergo HPS (i.e. younger, males and/or melanoma patients), limiting useless or
detrimental end-of-life antineoplastic treatments.

Get Citation

Keywords

palliative sedation, home care, palliative care, end-of-life care, cancer

About this article
Title

Palliative sedation at home: A medical act practicable everywhere

Journal

Palliative Medicine in Practice

Issue

Vol 16, No 2 (2022)

Article type

Research paper

Pages

86-92

Published online

2022-01-13

Page views

4634

Article views/downloads

288

DOI

10.5603/PMPI.2022.0001

Bibliographic record

Palliat Med Pract 2022;16(2):86-92.

Keywords

palliative sedation
home care
palliative care
end-of-life care
cancer

Authors

Grazia Armento
Alessandro Parisi
Giulio Ravoni
Giuseppe Spinelli
Vincenza Cofini
Stefano Necozione
Lucilla Verna
Giampiero Porzio

References (28)
  1. Cherny NI, Radbruch L. Board of the European Association for Palliative Care. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2009; 23(7): 581–593.
  2. Morita T, Imai K, Yokomichi N, et al. Continuous Deep Sedation: A Proposal for Performing More Rigorous Empirical Research. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017; 53(1): 146–152.
  3. Broeckaert B, Olarte JMN. Sedation in palliative care: facts and concepts. In: Ten Have-Clark eds. Open University Press 2002: 166–180.
  4. Braun T, Hagen N, Wasylenko E, et al. Sedation for intractable symptoms in palliative care: do GPS’s improbable care? J Palliat Care. 2000; 16: 63–94.
  5. de Graeff A, Dean M. Palliative sedation therapy in the last weeks of life: a literature review and recommendations for standards. J Palliat Med. 2007; 10(1): 67–85.
  6. Bulli F, Miccinesi G, Biancalani E, et al. Continuous deep sedation in home palliative care units: case studies in the Florence area in 2000 and in 2003–2004. Minerva Anestesiol. 2007; 73: 291–298.
  7. Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Jordhøy MS, Jannert M, et al. Place of death: hospital-based advanced home care versus conventional care. A prospective study in palliative cancer care. Palliat Med. 2004; 18(7): 585–593.
  8. Costantini M, Camoirano E, Madeddu L, et al. Palliative home care and place of death among cancer patients: a population-based study. Palliat Med. 1993; 7(4): 323–331.
  9. Alonso-Babarro A, Varela-Cerdeira M, Torres-Vigil I, et al. At-home palliative sedation for end-of-life cancer patients. Palliat Med. 2010; 24(5): 486–492.
  10. Beller EM, van Driel ML, McGregor L, et al. Palliative pharmacological sedation for terminally ill adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 1: CD010206.
  11. Cherny NI, Radbruch L. Board of the European Association for Palliative Care. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2009; 23(7): 581–593.
  12. Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, et al. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. Br Med J. 1974; 2(5920): 656–659.
  13. Rosengarten OS, Lamed Y, Zisling T, et al. Palliative sedation at home. J Palliat Care. 2009; 25(1): 5–11.
  14. Alonso-Babarro A, Varela-Cerdeira M, Torres-Vigil I, et al. At-home palliative sedation for end-of-life cancer patients. Palliat Med. 2010; 24(5): 486–492.
  15. Rosengarten OS, Lamed Y, Zisling T, et al. Palliative sedation at home. J Palliat Care. 2009; 25(1): 5–11.
  16. Mercadante S, Porzio G, Valle A, et al. Home Care Italy Group. Palliative sedation in patients with advanced cancer followed at home: a systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011; 41(4): 754–760.
  17. Mercadante S, Porzio G, Valle A, et al. Home Care-Italy Group. Palliative sedation in patients with advanced cancer followed at home: a prospective study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014; 47(5): 860–866.
  18. Bulli F, Miccinesi G, Biancalani E, et al. Continuous deep sedation in home palliative care units: case studies in the Florence area in 2000 and in 2003-2004. Minerva Anestesiol. 2007; 73(5): 291–298.
  19. Ang E, Newton LV. Thirty-day mortality after systemic anticancer treatment as a real-world, quality-of-care indicator: the Northland experience. Intern Med J. 2018; 48(4): 403–408.
  20. Yeung HM, Hebert RS. End-of-life chemotherapy: a prisoner's dilemma? BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018; 8(1): 58–60.
  21. Prigerson HG, Bao Y, Shah MA, et al. Chemotherapy Use, Performance Status, and Quality of Life at the End of Life. JAMA Oncol. 2015; 1(6): 778–784.
  22. Orsi L, Gristina GR. Palliative sedation: the position statement of the Italian National Committee for Bioethics. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017; 83(5): 524–528.
  23. Cherny NI, Radbruch L. Board of the European Association for Palliative Care. European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) recommended framework for the use of sedation in palliative care. Palliat Med. 2009; 23(7): 581–593.
  24. Mercadante S, Porzio G, Valle A, et al. Home Care–Italy Group (HOCAI). Palliative sedation in advanced cancer patients followed at home: a retrospective analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012; 43(6): 1126–1130.
  25. Orsi L, Gristina GR. Palliative sedation: the position statement of the Italian National Committee for Bioethics. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017; 83(5): 524–528.
  26. Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller M, et al. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS): A Simple Method for the Assessment of Palliative Care Patients. Journal of Palliative Care. 2019; 7(2): 6–9.
  27. Cortellini A, Porzio G, Masel EK, et al. The PERSONS score for symptoms assessment in simultaneous care setting: A pilot study. Palliat Support Care. 2019; 17(1): 82–86.
  28. Cortellini A, Porzio G, Cofini V, et al. The PERSONS score: A new tool for cancer patients' symptom assessment in simultaneous care and home care settings. Palliat Support Care. 2020; 18(1): 33–38.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73 , 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland

phone:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl