open access

Vol 7 (2022): Continuous Publishing
Original paper
Published online: 2022-11-10
Get Citation

Evaluation of long-term changes in physicochemical properties of hydrophobic intraocular lenses in a laboratory model

Piotr Chaniecki1, Ewa Stodolak-Zych2, Katarzyna Cholewa-Kowalska2, Marek Rękas3
·
Ophthalmol J 2022;7:176-187.
Affiliations
  1. Department of Ophthalmology, PCK Maritime Hospital in Gdynia, Gdynia, Poland
  2. Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Krakow, Poland
  3. Department of Ophthalmology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warszawa, Poland

open access

Vol 7 (2022): Continuous Publishing
ORIGINAL PAPERS
Published online: 2022-11-10

Abstract

Background: In ophthalmology, the surface properties of implants such as intraocular lenses (IOLs) play a crucial role in the quality of vision because they may affect posterior capsule opacification (PCO), which is one of the most common long-term complications of cataract surgery, inevitably leading to revision surgery. The PCO effect increases when the epithelial cells of the lens remaining in the capsule’s bag after IOLs implantation adhere, proliferate, grow, migrate and differentiate. For this reason, in vitro performance of IOLs, including protein adsorption on the implant surface (the initial step of cells adhesion), allows predicting its stability in vivo.

Material and methods: We evaluated the physicochemical properties of six different hydrophobic commercial intraocular lenses (IOLs) in a two-step model experiment. During the first step, IOLs were immersed in the BSS solution. This stage simulated a 5-year implantation of the IOL within the eye. During the second step, IOLs were incubated in the albumin  solution. These processes simulated protein adsorption onto the IOLs’ surface.

Results: On the surface of the examined IOLs glistening was observed in all the lenses after the in vitro condition. The model experiment showed that the transparency of the IOLs decreased by about 2–20% compared with the initial IOLs (p < 0.05). Surfaces of all IOLs became more hydrophilic after the glistening phenomena and after the time of protein (albumin) adsorption. Such surfaces are presumed to be more susceptible to adhesion of cells promoting the PCO effect. Conclusions: The in vitro results (57 days/85°C/PBS) showed that the synergistic effect of two factors — glistening and protein adsorption — did not deteriorate the quality of visual acuity; however, it may facilitate cell adhesion that precedes the PCO phenomenon.

Abstract

Background: In ophthalmology, the surface properties of implants such as intraocular lenses (IOLs) play a crucial role in the quality of vision because they may affect posterior capsule opacification (PCO), which is one of the most common long-term complications of cataract surgery, inevitably leading to revision surgery. The PCO effect increases when the epithelial cells of the lens remaining in the capsule’s bag after IOLs implantation adhere, proliferate, grow, migrate and differentiate. For this reason, in vitro performance of IOLs, including protein adsorption on the implant surface (the initial step of cells adhesion), allows predicting its stability in vivo.

Material and methods: We evaluated the physicochemical properties of six different hydrophobic commercial intraocular lenses (IOLs) in a two-step model experiment. During the first step, IOLs were immersed in the BSS solution. This stage simulated a 5-year implantation of the IOL within the eye. During the second step, IOLs were incubated in the albumin  solution. These processes simulated protein adsorption onto the IOLs’ surface.

Results: On the surface of the examined IOLs glistening was observed in all the lenses after the in vitro condition. The model experiment showed that the transparency of the IOLs decreased by about 2–20% compared with the initial IOLs (p < 0.05). Surfaces of all IOLs became more hydrophilic after the glistening phenomena and after the time of protein (albumin) adsorption. Such surfaces are presumed to be more susceptible to adhesion of cells promoting the PCO effect. Conclusions: The in vitro results (57 days/85°C/PBS) showed that the synergistic effect of two factors — glistening and protein adsorption — did not deteriorate the quality of visual acuity; however, it may facilitate cell adhesion that precedes the PCO phenomenon.

Get Citation

Keywords

implant stability; intraocular lenses (IOLs); cataract; polymer biomaterials; biocompatibility

About this article
Title

Evaluation of long-term changes in physicochemical properties of hydrophobic intraocular lenses in a laboratory model

Journal

Ophthalmology Journal

Issue

Vol 7 (2022): Continuous Publishing

Article type

Original paper

Pages

176-187

Published online

2022-11-10

Page views

3680

Article views/downloads

446

DOI

10.5603/OJ.2022.0025

Bibliographic record

Ophthalmol J 2022;7:176-187.

Keywords

implant stability
intraocular lenses (IOLs)
cataract
polymer biomaterials
biocompatibility

Authors

Piotr Chaniecki
Ewa Stodolak-Zych
Katarzyna Cholewa-Kowalska
Marek Rękas

References (33)
  1. Global Initiative for the Elimination of Avoidable Blindness, VISION 2020: the Right to Sight, World Health Organization, 2011. www.who.int/blindness/Vision2020_report.pdf.
  2. Lindstrom R. Thoughts on Cataract Surgery. Rev. Ophthalmol. 2015; 9(3). www.reviewofophthalmology.com/article/thoughts-on--cataract-surgery-2015.
  3. Oshika T, Amano S, Araie M, et al. Current Trends in Cataract and Refractive Surgery in Japan 1998 Survey. Jap J Ophthalmol. 2000; 44(3): 268–276.
  4. Chehade M, Elder MJ. Intraocular lens materials and styles: a review. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1997; 25(4): 255–263.
  5. Miyata A, Uchida N, Nakajima K, et al. Clinical and Experimental Observation of Glistening in Acrylic Intraocular Lenses. Jap J Ophthalmol. 2000; 44(6): 693.
  6. Cisneros-Lanuza A, Hurtado-Sarrió M, Duch-Samper A, et al. Glistenings in the Artiflex phakic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007; 33(8): 1405–1408.
  7. Tognetto D, Toto L, Sanguinetti G, et al. Glistenings in foldable intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28(7): 1211–1216.
  8. Wilkins E, Olson R. Glistenings with long-term follow-up of the surgidev B20/20 polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001; 132(5): 783–785.
  9. Colin J, Orignac I, Touboul D. Glistenings in a large series of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(12): 2121–2126.
  10. Dhaliwal D, Mamalis N, Olson R, et al. Visual significance of glistenings seen in the AcrySof intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surgery. 1996; 22(4): 452–457.
  11. Kato K, Nishida M, Yamane H, et al. Glistening formation in an AcrySof lens initiated by spinodal decompositionof the polymer network bytemperature change. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001; 27(9): 1493–1498.
  12. Nishihara H, Yaguchi S, Onishi T, et al. Surface scattering in implanted hydrophobic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29(7): 1385–1388.
  13. Matsushima H, Mukai K, Nagata M, et al. Analysis of surface whitening of extracted hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35(11): 1927–1934.
  14. Hollick EJ, Spalton DJ, Ursell PG, et al. Lens epithelial cell regression on the posterior capsule with different intraocular lens materials. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998; 82(10): 1182–1188.
  15. Pagnoulle C, Bozukova D, Gobin L, et al. Assessment of new-generation glistening-free hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens material. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012; 38(7): 1271–1277.
  16. Davson H. The eye. Vegetative Phisiology and Biochemistry. London Academic Press, London 1984: 367–412.
  17. Pokidysheva EN, Maklakova IA, Belomestnaya ZM, et al. Comparative analysis of human serum albumin adsorption and complement activation for intraocular lenses. Artif Organs. 2001; 25(6): 453–458.
  18. Minami K, Maruyama Y, Honbo M, et al. In vitro examination of surface light scattering in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40: 652–656.
  19. Thomes BE, Callaghan TA. Evaluation of in vitro glistening formation in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol. 2013; 7: 1529–1534.
  20. Gregori N, Spencer T, Mamalis N, et al. In vitro comparison of glistening formation among hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002; 28(7): 1262–1268.
  21. Bissen-Miyajima H, Minami K, Yoshino M, et al. Surface light scattering and visual function of diffractive multifocal hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses 6 years after implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013; 39(11): 1729–1733.
  22. Miyata A. Clinical and Experimental Observation of Glistening in Acrylic Intraocular Lenses. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000; 44(6): 693.
  23. Moreno-Montañés J, Alvarez A, Rodríguez-Conde R, et al. Clinical factors related to the frequency and intensity of glistenings in AcrySof intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29(10): 1980–1984.
  24. ISO 11979-5:2006 Opthalmic implants — intraocular lenses — part 5, Annex C — hydrolitic stability . www.contamac.com/files/IOL-Hydrolytic%20Stability.pdf.
  25. Oshika T, Shiokawa Y, Amano S, et al. Influence of glistenings on the optical quality of acrylic foldable intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol. 2001; 85(9): 1034–1037.
  26. Bohnert JL, Horbett TA, Ratner BD, et al. Adsorption of proteins from artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988; 29(3): 362–373.
  27. Garrett Q, Griesser HJ, Milthorpe BK, et al. Irreversible adsorption of human serum albumin to hydrogel contact lenses: a study using electron spin resonance spectroscopy. Biomaterials. 1999; 20(14): 1345–1356.
  28. Barbucci R, Magnani A, Leone G. The effects of spacer arms in cross-linked hyaluronan hydrogel on Fbg and HSA adsorption and conformation. Polymer. 2002; 43(12): 3541–3548.
  29. Demirel G, Ozçetin G, Turan E, et al. pH/temperature - sensitive imprinted ionic poly(N-tert-butylacrylamide-co-acrylamide/maleic acid) hydrogels for bovine serum albumin. Macromol Biosci. 2005; 5(10): 1032–1037.
  30. Beasley AM, Auffarth GU, von Recum AF. Intraocular lens implants: a biocompatibility review. J Invest Surg. 1996; 9(6): 399–413.
  31. González-Chomón C, Braga MEM, de Sousa HC, et al. Antifouling foldable acrylic IOLs loaded with norfloxacin by aqueous soaking and by supercritical carbon dioxide technology. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2012; 82(2): 383–391.
  32. Ogura Y, Ong MD, Akinay A, et al. Optical performance of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses with surface light scattering. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014; 40(1): 104–113.
  33. Sahu J, Kumar S, Mehta A. Visual outcomes and subjective satisfaction quotient of a multifocal intraocular lens in Indian population. Ophthalmol J. 2021; 6(0): 143–150.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

Publisher: VM Media Group sp. z o.o., Grupa Via Medica, 73 Świętokrzyska St., 80–180 Gdańsk

tel.:+48 58 310 94 94, faks:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl