Online first
Wytyczne / stanowisko ekspertów
Opublikowany online: 2024-12-31
Wyświetlenia strony 418
Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu 34
Pobierz cytowanie

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Zastosowanie ripretynibu w leczeniu chorych na zaawansowane nowotwory podścieliskowe przewodu pokarmowego (GIST) — stanowisko ekspertów

Anna Klimczak1, Hanna Koseła-Paterczyk1, Joanna Streb2, Lucjan Wyrwicz3, Tomasz Kubiatowski4, Monika Dudzisz-Śledź1, Maciej Krzakowski5, Piotr Rutkowski1

Streszczenie

Nowotwory podścieliskowe przewodu pokarmowego (GIST, gastrointestinal stroma tumors) to rzadko występujące złośliwe nowotwory (1,5 przypadków na 100 000 rocznie), stanowiące około 1–2% wszystkich nowotworów przewodu pokarmowego. Leczenie systemowe choroby zaawansowanej obejmuje w pierwszej kolejności zastosowanie inhibitorów receptora kinazy tyrozynowej (KIT) i receptora płytkopochodnego czynnika wzrostu (PDGFRA) w związku z występowaniem mutacji w genach kodujących te receptory. Do leków tych należą imatynib, sunitynib oraz regorafenib, przy czym standardem postępowania w leczeniu pierwszej linii jest charakteryzujący się największą skutecznością imatynib. Istotny problem kliniczny stanowią GIST, w których stwierdza się mutacje związane z opornością na dotychczas stosowane inhibitory kinaz tyrozynowych, jak również brak mutacji w nowotworze (tzw. GIST typu dzikiego). Lekiem, który wykazał skuteczność w przypadku mutacji związanych z opornością na inhibitory KIT oraz w GIST typu dzikiego jest ripretynib. W niniejszym opracowaniu przedstawione zostały dane dotyczące skuteczności i bezpieczeństwa stosowania ripretynibu oraz stanowisko ekspertów na temat zastosowania tego leku w praktyce klinicznej. 

Artykuł dostępny w formacie PDF

Dodaj do koszyka: 95,00 PLN

Posiadasz dostęp do tego artykułu?

Referencje

  1. Judson I, Jones RL, Wong NA, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): British Sarcoma Group clinical practice guidelines. Br J Cancer. 2024 [Epub ahead of print].
  2. Dudzisz-Śledź M, Klimczak A, Bylina E, et al. Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs): A Focus on Younger Patients. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(12).
  3. Murphy JD, Ma GL, Baumgartner JM, et al. Increased risk of additional cancers among patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors: A population-based study. Cancer. 2015; 121(17): 2960–2967.
  4. Smith MJ, Smith HG, Mahar AL, et al. The impact of additional malignancies in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Int J Cancer. 2016; 139(8): 1744–1751.
  5. Pantaleo MA, Nannini M, Corless CL, et al. Quadruple wild-type (WT) GIST: defining the subset of GIST that lacks abnormalities of KIT, PDGFRA, SDH, or RAS signaling pathways. Cancer Med. 2015; 4(1): 101–103.
  6. Pasini B, McWhinney SR, Bei T, et al. Clinical and molecular genetics of patients with the Carney-Stratakis syndrome and germline mutations of the genes coding for the succinate dehydrogenase subunits SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD. Eur J Hum Genet. 2008; 16(1): 79–88.
  7. Pitsava G, Settas N, Faucz FR, et al. Carney Triad, Carney-Stratakis Syndrome, 3PAS and Other Tumors Due to SDH Deficiency. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12: 680609.
  8. Shi Y, Ding Li, Mo C, et al. Bladder paraganglioma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, and SDHB germline mutation in a patient with Carney-Stratakis syndrome: A case report and literature review. Front Oncol. 2022; 12: 1030092.
  9. Dudzisz-Śledź M, Rutkowski P. Advances in the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology. 2020; 70(6): 280–287.
  10. von Mehren M, Kane JM, Riedel RF, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors, Version 2.2022. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022; 20(11): 1204–1214.
  11. van Houdt WJ, IJzerman NS, Schrijver AM, et al. Oncological Outcome After Diagnostic Biopsies in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2021; 274(6): e1093–e1098.
  12. Lopes LF, West RB, Bacchi LM, et al. DOG1 for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST): Comparison between 2 different antibodies. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2010; 18(4): 333–337.
  13. Judson I, Jones RL, Wong NA, et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST): British Sarcoma Group clinical practice guidelines. Br J Cancer. 2024 [Epub ahead of print].
  14. Tysarowski A, Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A, Marszałek A, et al. Molecular diagnostics of cancers – practical approach. Nowotwory. Journal of Oncology. 2023; 73(3): 174–186.
  15. Rutkowski P, Prochorec-Sobieszek M, Wągrodzki M. i in. Diagnostyka z wykorzystaniem sekwencjonowania następnej generacji (NGS) w mięsakach — rekomendacje. Onkol Prakt Klin Edu. 2020; 6(1): 1–8.
  16. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: review on morphology, molecular pathology, prognosis, and differential diagnosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006; 130(10): 1466–1478.
  17. Arseneaux M, Yarbrough D, Nagamoto T. Robotic-assisted free-handed, full-thickness gastric GIST resection with primary repair in unfavorable locations. J Robot Surg. 2019; 13(3): 491–494.
  18. Maggioni C, Shida A, Mancini R, et al. Safety profile and oncological outcomes of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) robotic resection: Single center experience. Int J Med Robot. 2019; 15(6): e2031.
  19. Casali PG, Blay JY, Abecassis N, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee, EURACAN and GENTURIS. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022; 33(1): 20–33.
  20. Babula E, Sikora A, Sobczuk P, et al. Ripretinib in the treatment of patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Oncol Clin Pract. 2024; 20(1): 40–51.
  21. Rutkowski P, Hompes D. Combined Therapy of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2016; 25(4): 735–759.
  22. Joensuu H, Eriksson M, Sundby Hall K, et al. One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012; 307(12): 1265–1272.
  23. Debiec-Rychter M, Sciot R, Le Cesne A, et al. EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group, Italian Sarcoma Group, Australasian GastroIntestinal Trials Group. KIT mutations and dose selection for imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Eur J Cancer. 2006; 42(8): 1093–1103.
  24. Debiec-Rychter M, Dumez H, Judson I, et al. EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Use of c-KIT/PDGFRA mutational analysis to predict the clinical response to imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours entered on phase I and II studies of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer. 2004; 40(5): 689–695.
  25. Heinrich MC, Owzar K, Corless CL, et al. Correlation of kinase genotype and clinical outcome in the North American Intergroup Phase III Trial of imatinib mesylate for treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor: CALGB 150105 Study by Cancer and Leukemia Group B and Southwest Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(33): 5360–5367.
  26. Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Meta-Analysis Group (MetaGIST). Comparison of two doses of imatinib for the treatment of unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of 1,640 patients. J Clin Oncol. 2010; 28(7): 1247–1253.
  27. Bednarski BK, Araujo DM, Yi M, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors impacting oncologic outcomes after neoadjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014; 21(8): 2499–2505.
  28. Glivec (imatynib) charakterystyka produktu leczniczego. https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2024/20240326162154/anx_162154_pl.pdf.
  29. Demetri GD, van Oosterom AT, Garrett CR, et al. Efficacy and safety of sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour after failure of imatinib: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2006; 368(9544): 1329–1338.
  30. Kang YK, George S, Jones RL, et al. Avapritinib Versus Regorafenib in Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic GI Stromal Tumor: A Randomized, Open-Label Phase III Study. J Clin Oncol. 2021; 39(28): 3128–3139.
  31. Demetri GD, Reichardt P, Kang YK, et al. GRID study investigators. Efficacy and safety of regorafenib for advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours after failure of imatinib and sunitinib (GRID): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013; 381(9863): 295–302.
  32. Heinrich MC, Marino-Enriquez A, Presnell A, et al. Sorafenib inhibits many kinase mutations associated with drug-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012; 11(8): 1770–1780.
  33. Montemurro M, Gelderblom H, Bitz U, et al. Sorafenib as third- or fourth-line treatment of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour and pretreatment including both imatinib and sunitinib, and nilotinib: A retrospective analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2013; 49(5): 1027–1031.
  34. Rutkowski P, Jagielska B, Andrzejuk J, et al. The analysis of the long-term outcomes of sorafenib therapy in routine practice in imatinib and sunitinib resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2017; 21(4): 285–289.
  35. Jones R, Serrano C, Mehren Mv, et al. Avapritinib in unresectable or metastatic PDGFRA D842V-mutant gastrointestinal stromal tumours: Long-term efficacy and safety data from the NAVIGATOR phase I trial. European Journal of Cancer. 2021; 145: 132–142.
  36. Dhillon S. Ripretinib: First Approval. Drugs. 2020; 80(11): 1133–1138.
  37. Blay JY, Serrano C, Heinrich MC, et al. Ripretinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (INVICTUS): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020; 21(7): 923–934.
  38. Bauer S, Jones RL, Blay JY, et al. Ripretinib Versus Sunitinib in Patients With Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor After Treatment With Imatinib (INTRIGUE): A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40(34): 3918–3928.
  39. Charakterystyka produktu leczniczego Qinlock (ripretynib). https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2021/20211118153574/anx_153574_pl.pdf.
  40. Schöffski P, George S, Heinrich MC, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in individuals with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated with ripretinib in the fourth-line setting: analysis from the phase 3 INVICTUS trial. BMC Cancer. 2022; 22(1): 1302.
  41. Bauer S, Heinrich MC, George S, et al. Clinical Activity of Ripretinib in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Harboring Heterogeneous Mutations in the Phase III INVICTUS Study. Clin Cancer Res. 2021; 27(23): 6333–6342.
  42. Heinrich MC, Jones RL, George S, et al. Ripretinib versus sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: ctDNA biomarker analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE trial. Nat Med. 2024; 30(2): 498–506.
  43. Zalcberg J, Blay JY, Chi P, et al. INSIGHT: A phase 3, randomized, open-label study of ripretinib vs sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor previously treated with imatinib with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(3_suppl): TPS767–TPS767.
  44. Zhang X, Zhang P, Qiu H, et al. Large-Scale, Multicenter, Prospective Registry Study of Ripretinib in Advanced GIST: A Real-World Study from China. Adv Ther. 2023; 40(9): 3817–3829.
  45. Xiao X, Yuan W, Wang C, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of third-line and over third-line therapy after imatinib and TKI resistance in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13: 978885.
  46. Lin LC, Huang WK, Yen CC, et al. Compassionate Use of Ripretinib for Patients With Metastatic Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: Taiwan and Hong Kong Experience. Front Oncol. 2022; 12: 883399; Erratum in: Front Oncol. 2022; 12: 1028118.
  47. Lim SuY, Ferro-López L, Barquin E, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Ripretinib in Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors within an Expanded Access Program: A Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(5).
  48. https://www.nfz.gov.pl/zarzadzenia-prezesa/uchwaly-rady-nfz.