Prevalence of ruptured small and very small aneurysms: a retrospective single-centre study
, 2, 3, 1, 4, 1, 1, 1
Abstract
Aim of study. To retrospectively assess the occurrence and consequences of subarachnoid haemorrhages (SAH) caused by ruptured intracranial aneurysms (RIA), particularly focusing on the treatment outcomes of small aneurysms treated with either endovascular embolisation or surgical intervention.
Material and methods. We retrospectively analysed data from 408 patients (144 males and 264 females) who were hospitalised between 2013 and 2022 at the Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology in University Hospital Nr 2 in Bydgoszcz, Poland. Clinical conditions at admission, assessed using the Glasgow Coma Scale, Hunt-Hess scale (H-H), modified Rankin scale (mRS), as well as age and sex, were recorded. Additionally, aneurysm data including size, localisation, and the method and outcome of endovascular or surgical treatment were examined.
Results. Among the 408 patients hospitalised due to SAH, the most common localisation of the 375 RIAs was the anterior communicating artery (AcomA) complex (111 cases, 29.6%), followed by the medial cerebral artery (MCA) (95 cases, 25.3%), internal carotid artery (ICA) (94 cases, 25%), and the vertebrobasilar complex (consisting of the basilar artery (BA) — 25 cases, vertebral artery (VA) — 13 cases, anterior inferior cerebellar artery (AICA) — one case, and posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) — four cases), which accounted for 43 SAH cases (11.46%). In 33 cases, neither RIA nor a haemorrhage source was identified, or arteriography showed no cerebral arteries contrast flow. Among the examined group of 375 RIAs, 45 (12%) were microaneurysms (≤ 3 mm), 35 (9%) were small aneurysms (3 ≤ 5 mm), 89 (24%) were medium-sized (5 ≤ 7 mm), and 151 (40%) were large aneurysms (> 7 mm), serving as the source of SAH. A better outcome was significantly associated with lower initial H-H grade (p < 0.001), higher GCS (p < 0.001), lower mRS at admission (p < 0.001), younger age (p < 0.001), smaller size (≤ 3 mm) (p < 0.001), and endovascular treatment (p < 0.001).
Conclusions. In this series, over 21% of patients suffered from SAH resulting from ruptured small aneurysms (≤ 5 mm), with 12% specifically attributed to ruptured very small aneurysms (≤ 3 mm), despite large aneurysms (> 7 mm) being the most prevalent source of bleeding in 40% of cases. A worse prognosis was primarily associated with the severity of SAH, reflected in poorer clinical status at admission and older age. Endovascular embolisation was found to be effective and associated with better outcomes compared to surgical treatment.
Keywords: intracranial aneurysmmicroaneurysmsubarachnoid haemorrhageaneurysm embolisation
References
- Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, et al. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003; 362(9378): 103–110.
- Thompson BG, Brown RD, Amin-Hanjani S, et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, American Heart Association, American Stroke Association. Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2015; 46(8): 2368–2400.
- Ikawa F, Morita A, Tominari S, et al. Japan Neurosurgical Society for UCAS Japan Investigators. Rupture risk of small unruptured cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2019; 132(1): 69–78.
- Connolly ES, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/american Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012; 43(6): 1711–1737.
- Pierot L, Barbe C, Spelle L, et al. ATENA investigators. Endovascular treatment of very small unruptured aneurysms: rate of procedural complications, clinical outcome, and anatomical results. Stroke. 2010; 41(12): 2855–2859.
- Chen J, Tong X, Feng X, et al. Management of Unruptured Small Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms in China: A Comparative Effectiveness Analysis Based on Real-World Data. Front Neurol. 2021; 12: 736127.
- Khorasanizadeh M, Pettersson SD, Maglinger B, et al. Trends in the size of treated unruptured intracranial aneurysms over 35 years. J Neurosurg. 2023; 139(5): 1328–1338.
- Merritt WC, Berns HF, Ducruet AF, et al. Definitions of intracranial aneurysm size and morphology: A call for standardization. Surg Neurol Int. 2021; 12: 506.
- Hunt WE, Hess RM. Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 1968; 28(1): 14–20.
- Park GT, Kim JH, Jung YJ, et al. Characteristics of patients with ruptured very small intracranial aneurysm sized less than 3 mm. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2021; 23(1): 1–5.
- Lee SHo, Kwun BD, Ryu J, et al. Incidental Microaneurysms During Microvascular Surgery: Incidence, Treatment, and Significance. World Neurosurg. 2020; 133: e149–e155.
- Kassell N, Torner J. Size of Intracranial Aneurysms. Neurosurgery. 1983; 12(3): 291–297.
- Lee KS, Zhang JJY, Alalade AF, et al. Radiological surveillance of small unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of 8428 aneurysms. Neurosurg Rev. 2021; 44(4): 2013–2023.
- Korja M, Lehto H, Juvela S, et al. Lifelong rupture risk of intracranial aneurysms depends on risk factors: a prospective Finnish cohort study. Stroke. 2014; 45(7): 1958–1963.
- Lombarski L, Kunert P, Tarka S, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: relation between morphology and wall strength. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2022; 56(5): 410–416.
- Molyneux A, Kerr R, Birks J, et al. Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. The Lancet Neurology. 2009; 8(5): 427–433.
- Wiebers DO, Piepgras DG, Thielen K, et al. Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms - risk of rupture and risk of surgical intervention. N Engl J Med. 1998; 339: 1725–33.
- Sonobe M, Yamazaki T, Yonekura M, et al. Small unruptured intracranial aneurysm verification study: SUAVe study, Japan. Stroke. 2010; 41(9): 1969–1977.
- The Natural Course of Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms in a Japanese Cohort. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012; 366(26): 2474–2482.
- Molyneux AJ, Kerr RSC, Yu LM, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005; 366(9488): 809–817.
- Joo SW, Lee SI, Noh SJ, et al. What Is the Significance of a Large Number of Ruptured Aneurysms Smaller than 7 mm in Diameter? J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009; 45(2): 85–89.
- Szmygin P, Szmygin M, Roman T, et al. Endovascular treatment of vertebrobasilar system aneurysms - long term results. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2021; 55(6): 567–573.
- Ishibashi T, Murayama Y, Urashima M, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: incidence of rupture and risk factors. Stroke. 2009; 40(1): 313–316.
- Dolati P, Pittman D, Morrish WF, et al. The Frequency of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from Very Small Cerebral Aneurysms (< 5 mm): A Population-Based Study. Cureus. 2015; 7(6): e279.
- Greving JP, Wermer MJH, Brown RD, et al. Development of the PHASES score for prediction of risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a pooled analysis of six prospective cohort studies. Lancet Neurol. 2014; 13(1): 59–66.
- Bijlenga P, Gondar R, Schilling S, et al. PHASES Score for the Management of Intracranial Aneurysm: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Retrospective Study. Stroke. 2017; 48(8): 2105–2112.
- Miękisiak G, Fercho J, Pettersson SD, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on incidence and treatment of intracranial aneurysms in Poland: a national study. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2022; 56(1): 96–100.
- Brinjikji W, Lanzino G, Cloft HJ, et al. Endovascular treatment of very small (3 mm or smaller) intracranial aneurysms: report of a consecutive series and a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2010; 41(1): 116–121.
- Nguyen TN, Raymond J, Guilbert F, et al. Association of endovascular therapy of very small ruptured aneurysms with higher rates of procedure-related rupture. J Neurosurg. 2008; 108(6): 1088–1092.
- Iskandar A, Nepper-Rasmussen J. Endovascular treatment of very small intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2011; 17(3): 299–305.
- Wang JW, Li CH, Tian YY, et al. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of ruptured tiny cerebral aneurysms compared with ruptured larger aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol. 2020; 26(3): 283–290.
- Vergouwen MDI, Germans MR, Post R, et al. Aneurysm treatment within 6 h versus 6-24 h after rupture in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Eur Stroke J. 2023; 8(3): 802–807.
