open access

Vol 8, No 2 (2023)
Letter to the Editor
Published online: 2023-06-12
Get Citation

Why mitigation measures are less considered in disaster management in low-income countries?

Shandiz Moslehi12, Sajjad Narimani23
DOI: 10.5603/DEMJ.a2023.0022
·
Disaster Emerg Med J 2023;8(2):126-127.
Affiliations
  1. Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. Department of Nursing and Midwifery, School of Nursing, Social Determinant of Health Research Center, Ardabil University of Medical Sciences, Ardabil, Iran

open access

Vol 8, No 2 (2023)
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Published online: 2023-06-12

Abstract

After the earthquake in Indonesia and Japan, the governments gathered in Kobe and pledged to prioritize the following measures in their countries: Ensuring that disaster risk reduction is a national and a local priority with a strong institutional basis for implementation. Identifying, assessing and monitoring disaster risks and enhancing early warning. Using knowledge, innovation, and education to build a culture of safety and resilience at all levels. Reducing the underlying risk factors. Strengthening disaster preparedness for effective response at all levels. Also, in the Sendai Framework, they committed that the risk perception should be the priority of governments and should be considered in all civil structures. In this letter, there are reasons that can reduce mitigation measures of governments in earthquake-prone countries.

Abstract

After the earthquake in Indonesia and Japan, the governments gathered in Kobe and pledged to prioritize the following measures in their countries: Ensuring that disaster risk reduction is a national and a local priority with a strong institutional basis for implementation. Identifying, assessing and monitoring disaster risks and enhancing early warning. Using knowledge, innovation, and education to build a culture of safety and resilience at all levels. Reducing the underlying risk factors. Strengthening disaster preparedness for effective response at all levels. Also, in the Sendai Framework, they committed that the risk perception should be the priority of governments and should be considered in all civil structures. In this letter, there are reasons that can reduce mitigation measures of governments in earthquake-prone countries.

Get Citation

Keywords

earthquake; mitigation measures; disaster management

About this article
Title

Why mitigation measures are less considered in disaster management in low-income countries?

Journal

Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal

Issue

Vol 8, No 2 (2023)

Article type

Letter to the Editor

Pages

126-127

Published online

2023-06-12

Page views

1152

Article views/downloads

206

DOI

10.5603/DEMJ.a2023.0022

Bibliographic record

Disaster Emerg Med J 2023;8(2):126-127.

Keywords

earthquake
mitigation measures
disaster management

Authors

Shandiz Moslehi
Sajjad Narimani

References (7)
  1. Zhang Y, Fung JF, Johnson KJ, et al. Review of Seismic Risk Mitigation Policies in Earthquake-Prone Countries: Lessons for Earthquake Resilience in the United States. J Earthq Eng. 2022; 26(12).
  2. Aslan G, Lasserre C, Cakir Z, et al. Shallow Creep Along the 1999 Izmit Earthquake Rupture (Turkey) From GPS and High Temporal Resolution Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar Data (2011–2017). Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 2019; 124(2): 2218–2236.
  3. Wanner M. The effectiveness of soft law in international environmental regimes: participation and compliance in the Hyogo Framework for Action. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 2020; 21(1): 113–132.
  4. Sebesvari Z, Woelki J, Walz Y, et al. Opportunities for considering green infrastructure and ecosystems in the Sendai Framework Monitor. Progress in Disaster Science. 2019; 2: 100021.
  5. Chan CS, Nozu K, Cheung T. Tourism and natural disaster management process: perception of tourism stakeholders in the case of Kumamoto earthquake in Japan. Current Issues in Tourism. 2019; 23(15): 1864–1885.
  6. Sasaki H, Maruya H, Abe Y, et al. Scoping Review of Hospital Business Continuity Plans to Validate the Improvement after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020; 251(3): 147–159.
  7. Toyoda Y. A Framework of Simulation and Gaming for Enhancing Community Resilience Against Large-Scale Earthquakes: Application for Achievements in Japan. Simulation & Gaming. 2020; 51(2): 180–211.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl