open access
Neck stabilization in trauma patient: an emergency medicine perspective
, 2
Affiliations- Research Unit, Polish Society of Disaster Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital in Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic
open access
Abstract
Spinal trauma is among the most common causes of death among young and healthy individuals. Additionally, due to disability, spinal injury places an enormous burden on both the economical system and the society itself. The main principle of managing early spinal injury in an emergency setting is to stabilize the patient to prevent movement and further deterioration of the patient’s status. This procedure is especially important in the suspicion of cervical spine trauma due to the vital nerves that run through this part of the spine. The cornerstone of diagnosis of spinal damage is CT although it is not perfectly suited for the assessment of the spinal cord injury. The golden standard for the assessment of the extent of damage is MRI, which allows for the best visualization of the soft tissues. To date, there have been developed several devices which allow for the immobilization of the spine. The most commonly used is the cervical collar which restricts the movement of the neck, therefore preventing further damage to the spine. The second device is called longboard, on which the patient is laid and then attached by the straps. While easy to use and fast to apply, the guidelines recommend against the use of the said device and place its role more toward quick extraction devices. The same guidelines recommend the vacuum mattress as a method of choice for transporting patients. Although stabilization is important there are some groups of patients who do not benefit from immobilization. The scales that facilitate the decision-making process are easy to use and achieve high sensitivity.
Abstract
Spinal trauma is among the most common causes of death among young and healthy individuals. Additionally, due to disability, spinal injury places an enormous burden on both the economical system and the society itself. The main principle of managing early spinal injury in an emergency setting is to stabilize the patient to prevent movement and further deterioration of the patient’s status. This procedure is especially important in the suspicion of cervical spine trauma due to the vital nerves that run through this part of the spine. The cornerstone of diagnosis of spinal damage is CT although it is not perfectly suited for the assessment of the spinal cord injury. The golden standard for the assessment of the extent of damage is MRI, which allows for the best visualization of the soft tissues. To date, there have been developed several devices which allow for the immobilization of the spine. The most commonly used is the cervical collar which restricts the movement of the neck, therefore preventing further damage to the spine. The second device is called longboard, on which the patient is laid and then attached by the straps. While easy to use and fast to apply, the guidelines recommend against the use of the said device and place its role more toward quick extraction devices. The same guidelines recommend the vacuum mattress as a method of choice for transporting patients. Although stabilization is important there are some groups of patients who do not benefit from immobilization. The scales that facilitate the decision-making process are easy to use and achieve high sensitivity.
Keywords
cervical spine; trauma; neck; cervical collar
About this articleTitle
Neck stabilization in trauma patient: an emergency medicine perspective
Journal
Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal
Issue
Article type
Review paper
Pages
52-57
Published online
2022-03-18
Page views
5410
Article views/downloads
936
DOI
Bibliographic record
Disaster Emerg Med J 2022;7(1):52-57.
Keywords
cervical spine
trauma
neck
cervical collar
Authors
Michal Ladny
Wladyslaw Gawel
References (68)- Rhee P, Joseph B, Pandit V, et al. Increasing trauma deaths in the United States. Ann Surg. 2014; 260(1): 13–21.
- Klein J, Prabhakaran K, Latifi R, et al. Firearms: the leading cause of years of potential life lost. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2022; 7(1): e000766.
- Dryden DM, Saunders LD, Jacobs P, et al. Direct health care costs after traumatic spinal cord injury. J Trauma. 2005; 59(2): 464–467.
- Kobbe P, Krug P, Andruszkow H, et al. Early spinal injury stabilization in multiple-injured patients: do all patients benefit? J Clin Med. 2020; 9(6).
- Kaiser JT, Reddy V, Lugo-Pico JG. Anatomy, Head and Neck, Cervical Vertebrae. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, In: StatPearls [Internet]. 2021.
- Hsu WK. Advanced techniques in cervical spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(8): 780–788.
- DeSai C, Reddy V, Agarwal A. Anatomy, Back, Vertebral Column. [Updated 2021 Aug 11]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan-.
- Prince EA, Ahn SHo. Basic vascular neuroanatomy of the brain and spine: what the general interventional radiologist needs to know. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013; 30(3): 234–239.
- Ahn SH, Kim BJ, Kim YJ, et al. Patterns and Outcomes of the Top of the Basilar Artery Syndrome: The Role of the Posterior Communicating Artery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018; 46(3-4): 108–117.
- Boonpirak N, Apinhasmit W. Length and caudal level of termination of the spinal cord in Thai adults. Acta Anat (Basel). 1994; 149(1): 74–78.
- Cohen SP, et al. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015; 90(2): 284–299.
- Bransford RJ, Alton TB, Patel AR, et al. Upper cervical spine trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014; 22(11): 718–729.
- Passias PG, Poorman GW, Segreto FA, et al. Traumatic Fractures of the Cervical Spine: Analysis of Changes in Incidence, Cause, Concurrent Injuries, and Complications Among 488,262 Patients from 2005 to 2013. World Neurosurg. 2018; 110: e427–e437.
- Eckert MJ, Martin MJ. Trauma: spinal cord injury. Surg Clin North Am. 2017; 97(5): 1031–1045.
- Khanpara S, Ruiz-Pardo D, Spence SC, et al. Incidence of cervical spine fractures on CT: a study in a large level I trauma center. Emerg Radiol. 2020; 27(1): 1–8.
- Kumar Y, Hayashi D. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in acute spinal trauma: a pictorial review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17: 310.
- Liu Q, Liu Q, Zhao J, et al. Early MRI finding in adult spinal cord injury without radiologic abnormalities does not correlate with the neurological outcome: a retrospective study. Spinal Cord. 2015; 53(10): 750–753.
- Ellingson BM, Salamon N, Holly LT. Imaging techniques in spinal cord injury. World Neurosurg. 2014; 82(6): 1351–1358.
- Talbott JF, Whetstone WD, Readdy WJ, et al. The Brain and Spinal Injury Center score: a novel, simple, and reproducible method for assessing the severity of acute cervical spinal cord injury with axial T2-weighted MRI findings. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015; 23(4): 495–504.
- Aarabi B, Sansur CA, Ibrahimi DM, et al. Intramedullary Lesion Length on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a Strong Predictor of ASIA Impairment Scale Grade Conversion Following Decompressive Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury. Neurosurgery. 2017; 80(4): 610–620.
- Matthiessen C, Robinson Y. Epidemiology of atlas fractures — a national registry-based cohort study of 1,537 cases. Spine J. 2015; 15(11): 2332–2337.
- Kakarla UK, Chang SW, Theodore N, et al. Atlas fractures. Neurosurgery. 2010; 66(3 Suppl): 60–67.
- Garrett M, Consiglieri G, Kakarla UK, et al. Occipitoatlantal dislocation. Neurosurgery. 2010; 66(3 Suppl): 48–55.
- Radcliff KE, Sonagli MA, Rodrigues LM, et al. Does C₁ fracture displacement correlate with transverse ligament integrity? Orthop Surg. 2013; 5(2): 94–99.
- Jackson RS, Banit DM, Rhyne AL, et al. Upper cervical spine injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002; 10(4): 271–280.
- Kesterson L, Benzel E, Orrison W, et al. Evaluation and treatment of atlas burst fractures (Jefferson fractures). J Neurosurg. 1991; 75(2): 213–220.
- Bakhsh A, Alzahrani A, Aljuzair AH, et al. Fractures of C2 (axis) vertebra: clinical presentation and management. Int J Spine Surg. 2020; 14(6): 908–915.
- Hadley MN, Browner C, Sonntag VK. Axis fractures: a comprehensive review of management and treatment in 107 cases. Neurosurgery. 1985; 17(2): 281–290.
- Labler L, Eid K, Platz A, et al. Atlanto-occipital dislocation: four case reports of survival in adults and review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2004; 13(2): 172–180.
- Theodore N, Hadley MN, Aarabi B, et al. Prehospital cervical spinal immobilization after trauma. Neurosurgery. 2013; 72 Suppl 2: 22–34.
- Fehlings MG, Louw D. Initial stabilization and medical management of acute spinal cord injury. Am Fam Physician. 1996; 54(1): 155–162.
- Fenstermaker RA. Acute neurologic management of the patient with spinal cord injury. Urol Clin North Am. 1993; 20(3): 413–421.
- Bohlman HH. Acute fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. An analysis of three hundred hospitalized patients and review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61(8): 1119–1142.
- Bell KM, Frazier EC, Shively CM, et al. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses. Spine J. 2009; 9(3): 225–231.
- Marshall LF, Knowlton S, Garfin SR, et al. Deterioration following spinal cord injury. A multicenter study. J Neurosurg. 1987; 66(3): 400–404.
- Deasy C, Cameron P. Routine application of cervical collars — what is the evidence? Injury. 2011; 42(9): 841–842.
- Bell KM, Frazier EC, Shively CM, et al. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses. Spine J. 2009; 9(3): 225–231.
- Chin KR, Auerbach JD, Adams SB, et al. Mastication causing segmental spinal motion in common cervical orthoses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(4): 430–434.
- Chandler D, Nemejc C, Adkins R, et al. Emergency cervical-spine immobilization. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1992; 21(10): 1185–1188.
- Horodyski M, DiPaola CP, Conrad BP, et al. Cervical collars are insufficient for immobilizing an unstable cervical spine injury. J Emerg Med. 2011; 41(5): 513–519.
- Prasarn ML, Conrad B, Del Rossi G, et al. Motion generated in the unstable cervical spine during the application and removal of cervical immobilization collars. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012; 72(6): 1609–1613.
- Woster CM, Zwank MD, Pasquarella JR, et al. Placement of a cervical collar increases the optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy adults. Am J Emerg Med. 2018; 36(3): 430–434.
- Benger J, Blackham J. Why do we put cervical collars on conscious trauma patients? Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2009; 17(44).
- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Emergency Care and Transportation of the Sick and Injured. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Chicago 1971.
- Cordell WH, Hollingsworth JC, Olinger ML, et al. Pain and tissue-interface pressures during spine-board immobilization. Ann Emerg Med. 1995; 26(1): 31–36.
- Sheerin F, de Frein R. The occipital and sacral pressures experienced by healthy volunteers under spinal immobilization: a trial of three surfaces. J Emerg Nurs. 2007; 33(5): 447–450.
- Totten VY, Sugarman DB. Respiratory effects of spinal immobilization. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999; 3(4): 347–352.
- Bauer D, Kowalski R. Effect of spinal immobilization devices on pulmonary function in the healthy, nonsmoking man. Ann Emerg Med. 1988; 17(9): 915–918.
- White 4th CC, Domeier RM, Millin MG, et al. Standards and Clinical Practice Committee, National Association of EMS Physicians. EMS spinal precautions and the use of the long backboard — resource document to the position statement of the National Association of EMS Physicians and the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014; 18(2): 306–314.
- Maschmann C, Jeppesen E, Rubin MA, et al. New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients — consensus and evidence based. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019; 27(1): 77.
- Keller BP, Lubbert PHW, Keller E, et al. Tissue-interface pressures on three different support-surfaces for trauma patients. Injury. 2005; 36(8): 946–948.
- Lovell ME, Evans JH. A comparison of the spinal board and the vacuum stretcher, spinal stability and interface pressure. Injury. 1994; 25(3): 179–180.
- Chan D, Goldberg RM, Mason J, et al. Backboard versus mattress splint immobilization: a comparison of symptoms generated. J Emerg Med. 1996; 14(3): 293–298.
- Hamilton R, Pons P. The efficacy and comfort of full-body vacuum splints for cervical-spine immobilization. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 1996; 14(5): 553–559.
- Johnson DR, Hauswald M, Stockhoff C. Comparison of a vacuum splint device to a rigid backboard for spinal immobilization. Am J Emerg Med. 1996; 14(4): 369–372.
- Roessler Ms, Riffelmann M, Kunze-Szikszay N, et al. Vacuum mattress or long spine board: which method of spinal stabilisation in trauma patients is more time consuming? A simulation study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021; 29(1): 46.
- McGuire RA, Neville S, Green BA, et al. Spinal instability and the log-rolling maneuver. The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 1987; 27(5): 525–531.
- Domeier RM, Evans RW, Swor RA, et al. The reliability of prehospital clinical evaluation for potential spinal injury is not affected by the mechanism of injury. Prehosp Emerg Care. 1999; 3(4): 332–337.
- Kornhall DK, Jørgensen JJ, Brommeland T, et al. The Norwegian guidelines for the prehospital management of adult trauma patients with potential spinal injury. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017; 25(1): 2.
- Taub EC. Cervical spine immobilization in athletes-to immobilize or not? A systematic review. Clin J Sport Med. 2017; 27: E44–E45.
- Purvis TA, Carlin B, Driscoll P. The definite risks and questionable benefits of liberal pre-hospital spinal immobilisation. Am J Emerg Med. 2017; 35(6): 860–866.
- Nemunaitis G, Roach MJ, Hefzy MS, et al. Redesign of a spine board: Proof of concept evaluation. Assist Technol. 2016; 28(3): 144–151.
- Maschmann C, Jeppesen E, Rubin MA, et al. New clinical guidelines on the spinal stabilisation of adult trauma patients — consensus and evidence based. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019; 27(1): 77.
- Fischer PE, Perina DG, Delbridge TR, et al. Spinal motion restriction in the trauma patient — a joint position statement. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018; 22(6): 659–661.
- Theodore N, Hadley MN, Aarabi B, et al. Prehospital cervical spinal immobilization after trauma. Neurosurgery. 2013; 72 Suppl 2: 22–34.
- Paykin G, O'Reilly G, Ackland H, et al. Review article: NEXUS criteria to rule out cervical spine injury among older patients: A systematic review. Emerg Med Australas. 2018; 30(4): 450–455.
- Hoffman JR, Mower WR, Wolfson AB, et al. Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000; 343(2): 94–99.
- Stiell IG, Clement CM, McKnight RD, et al. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma. N Engl J Med. 2003; 349(26): 2510–2518.