open access

Vol 7, No 1 (2022)
Case report
Published online: 2021-12-15
Get Citation

Global casualty care in operation area (cardiopulmonary resuscitation and damage control surgery)

Shibu Sasidharan1, Shyam Krishna1, Aanchal Varma1, Babitha Shibu2, Harpreet Dhillon3
·
Disaster Emerg Med J 2022;7(1):63-69.
Affiliations
  1. 150 GH, Jammu, India, India
  2. Ojas Alchemist Hospital, Panchkula, India
  3. Military Hospital, Jammu, India

open access

Vol 7, No 1 (2022)
CASE REPORTS
Published online: 2021-12-15

Abstract

Urgent surgery should not be performed preferably for at least 72 hours after a cardiac arrest to minimize the risk for additional perfusion-related organ injury. However, in peculiar circumstances, especially in a military setting, emergency surgery may be necessary in selected patients to save health and life. A previously healthy 34-year-old soldier developed multiple splinter injuries and mangled injury to his right arm after a missile attack. Due to heavy shelling and enemy fire, he bled profusely and could not be immediately evacuated to the medical aid post. After reaching the first-aid post, he was navigated through various medical echelons before reaching our center (Level III) where he was resuscitated and limb-salvage surgery was done. En route to the hospital, he suffered a cardiac arrest, was resuscitated, and had the second arrest on arrival. He was revived within 3 minutes and rushed to the operation theatre, where damage control surgery was done, including a brachial artery anastomosis. After the initial surgery, he was air-evacuated to the nearest tertiary center, where he was further managed by the vascular surgeon and cardiologist and made a full recovery. Immediate hemostasis of culprit injury is mandatory to make fluid resuscitation effective. Administering effective CPR, volume replenishment using crystalloids and whole blood, balanced anesthesia, damage control surgery, and teamwork can save patients’ limbs and lives.

Abstract

Urgent surgery should not be performed preferably for at least 72 hours after a cardiac arrest to minimize the risk for additional perfusion-related organ injury. However, in peculiar circumstances, especially in a military setting, emergency surgery may be necessary in selected patients to save health and life. A previously healthy 34-year-old soldier developed multiple splinter injuries and mangled injury to his right arm after a missile attack. Due to heavy shelling and enemy fire, he bled profusely and could not be immediately evacuated to the medical aid post. After reaching the first-aid post, he was navigated through various medical echelons before reaching our center (Level III) where he was resuscitated and limb-salvage surgery was done. En route to the hospital, he suffered a cardiac arrest, was resuscitated, and had the second arrest on arrival. He was revived within 3 minutes and rushed to the operation theatre, where damage control surgery was done, including a brachial artery anastomosis. After the initial surgery, he was air-evacuated to the nearest tertiary center, where he was further managed by the vascular surgeon and cardiologist and made a full recovery. Immediate hemostasis of culprit injury is mandatory to make fluid resuscitation effective. Administering effective CPR, volume replenishment using crystalloids and whole blood, balanced anesthesia, damage control surgery, and teamwork can save patients’ limbs and lives.

Get Citation

Keywords

cardiopulmonary resuscitation, CPR, military medicine, hypovolemic shock, damage control surgery

About this article
Title

Global casualty care in operation area (cardiopulmonary resuscitation and damage control surgery)

Journal

Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal

Issue

Vol 7, No 1 (2022)

Article type

Case report

Pages

63-69

Published online

2021-12-15

Page views

4792

Article views/downloads

289

DOI

10.5603/DEMJ.a2021.0030

Bibliographic record

Disaster Emerg Med J 2022;7(1):63-69.

Keywords

cardiopulmonary resuscitation
CPR
military medicine
hypovolemic shock
damage control surgery

Authors

Shibu Sasidharan
Shyam Krishna
Aanchal Varma
Babitha Shibu
Harpreet Dhillon

References (33)
  1. Cross J, Ficke J, Hsu J, et al. Battlefield Orthopaedic Injuries Cause the Majority of Long-term Disabilities. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeon. 2011; 19: S1–S7.
  2. Sasidharan S. Battlefront medicine – scoop and scoot or stay and play? Revista Chilena de Anestesia. 2021; 50(4): 558–560.
  3. Nolan JP, Berg RA, Andersen LW, et al. Cardiac Arrest and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Outcome Reports: Update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Template for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Consensus Report From a Task Force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia). Circulation. 2019; 140(18): e746–e757.
  4. Mateen FJ, Josephs KA, Trenerry MR, et al. Long-term cognitive outcomes following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a population-based study. Neurology. 2021; 77(15): 1438–1445.
  5. Sasidharan S, Lahareesh BL, Dhillon H. Lessons from a battle-front: When and where to “scoop and scoot”? MRIMS Journal of Health Sciences. 2021; 9(2): 77.
  6. Kragh JF, Litrell ML, Jones JA, et al. Battle casualty survival with emergency tourniquet use to stop limb bleeding. J Emerg Med. 2011; 41(6): 590–597.
  7. Bogdan Y, Helfet D. Use of Tourniquets in Limb Trauma Surgery. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2018; 49(2): 157–165.
  8. Malo C, Bernardin B, Nemeth J, et al. Prolonged prehospital tourniquet placement associated with severe complications: a case report. CJEM. 2015; 17(4): 443–446.
  9. Drolet B, Okhah Z, Phillips B, et al. Evidence for Safe Tourniquet Use in 500 Consecutive Upper Extremity Procedures. HAND. 2014; 9(4): 494–498.
  10. Lakstein D, Blumenfeld A, Lin G, et al. Tourniquets for hemorrhage control on the battlefield: a 4-year accumulated experience. J Trauma. 2003; 54(5 Suppl).
  11. Berséus O, Hervig T, Seghatchian J. Military walking blood bank and the civilian blood service. Transfus Apher Sci. 2012; 46(3): 341–342.
  12. Sessler D. Perioperative thermoregulation and heat balance. The Lancet. 2016; 387(10038): 2655–2664.
  13. Hrezo R, Clark J. The walking blood bank: An alternative blood supply in military mass casualties. Disaster Manag Response. 2003; 1(1): 19–22.
  14. Rutlen DL, Wackers FJ, Zaret BL. Radionuclide assessment of peripheral intravascular capacity: a technique to measure intravascular volume changes in the capacitance circulation in man. Circulation. 1981; 64(1): 146–152.
  15. Olasveengen TM, Mancini ME, Perkins GD, et al. Adult Basic Life Support Collaborators. Adult Basic Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2020; 142(16_suppl_1): S41–S91.
  16. Egal M, Erler NS, de Geus HRH, et al. Targeting Oliguria Reversal in Goal-Directed Hemodynamic Management Does Not Reduce Renal Dysfunction in Perioperative and Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016; 122(1): 173–185.
  17. Senapathi TG, Wiryana M, Aribawa IG, et al. Bispectral index value correlates with Glasgow Coma Scale in traumatic brain injury patients. Open Access Emerg Med. 2017; 9: 43–46.
  18. Mahmood S, Parchani A, El-Menyar A, et al. Utility of bispectral index in the management of multiple trauma patients. Surg Neurol Int. 2014; 5: 141.
  19. Paellis T, Sanfilippo F, Ristagno G. The optimal hemodynamics management of post-cardiac arrest shock. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2015; 29(4): 485–495.
  20. Rochwerg B, Hylands M, Møller MH, et al. CCCS-SSAI WikiRecs clinical practice guideline: vasopressor blood pressure targets in critically ill adults with hypotension and vasopressor use in early traumatic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2017; 43(7): 1062–1064.
  21. Beylin ME, Perman SM, Abella BS, et al. Higher mean arterial pressure with or without vasoactive agents is associated with increased survival and better neurological outcomes in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest. Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39(11): 1981–1988.
  22. Mackenzie SJ, Kapadia F, Nimmo GR, et al. Adrenaline in treatment of septic shock: effects on haemodynamics and oxygen transport. Intensive Care Med. 1991; 17(1): 36–39.
  23. Ukor IF, Walley KR. Vasopressin in Vasodilatory Shock. Crit Care Clin. 2019; 35(2): 247–261.
  24. Erley C. Epinephrine Versus Norepinephrine for Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction. The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2018; 55(5): 736.
  25. De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, et al. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med . 2010; 362(9): 779–789.
  26. Vincent JL, Taccone FS, He X. Harmful Effects of Hyperoxia in Postcardiac Arrest, Sepsis, Traumatic Brain Injury, or Stroke: The Importance of Individualized Oxygen Therapy in Critically Ill Patients. Can Respir J. 2017; 2017: 2834956.
  27. Roberts BW, Kilgannon BA, Hunter BR. Association Between Early Hyperoxia Exposure After Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest and Neurological Disability: Prospective Multicenter Protocol-Directed Cohort Study. Circulation. 2018; 137(20): 2114–2124.
  28. Herff H, Paal P, Goedecke Av, et al. Influence of ventilation strategies on survival in severe controlled hemorrhagic shock. Critical Care Medicine. 2008; 36(9): 2613–2620.
  29. Aufderheide T, Lurie K. Death by hyperventilation: A common and life-threatening problem during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Critical Care Medicine. 2004; 32(Supplement): S345–S351.
  30. Hensley NB, Hogue CW. Anesthesia for emergency surgery after cardiac arrest or traumatic. Anesthesia for emergency surgery after cardiac arrest or traumatic 2016; 6–11. .
  31. Luethi N, Cioccari L, Eastwood G, et al. Hospital‐acquired complications in intensive care unit patients with diabetes: A before‐and‐after study of a conventional versus liberal glucose control protocol. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 2019; 63(6): 761–768.
  32. Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SYS, et al. NICE-SUGAR Study Investigators. Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(13): 1283–1297.
  33. Shin TG, Jo IkJ, Hwang SY, et al. Comprehensive Interpretation of Central Venous Oxygen Saturation and Blood Lactate Levels During Resuscitation of Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in the Emergency Department. Shock. 2016; 45(1): 4–9.

Regulations

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By VM Media Group sp. z o.o., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl