open access

Vol 3, No 4 (2018)
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Published online: 2018-12-31
Get Citation

Which chest compression technique is more fatiguing for rescuer?

Jesus Blanco, Marcin Madziala, Patrycja Szalast
DOI: 10.5603/DEMJ.2018.0031
·
Disaster Emerg Med J 2018;3(4):150-151.

open access

Vol 3, No 4 (2018)
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Published online: 2018-12-31

Abstract

Not available

Abstract

Not available
Get Citation
About this article
Title

Which chest compression technique is more fatiguing for rescuer?

Journal

Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal

Issue

Vol 3, No 4 (2018)

Pages

150-151

Published online

2018-12-31

DOI

10.5603/DEMJ.2018.0031

Bibliographic record

Disaster Emerg Med J 2018;3(4):150-151.

Authors

Jesus Blanco
Marcin Madziala
Patrycja Szalast

References (10)
  1. Wieczorek W, Kaminska H. Impact of a corpuls CPR Mechanical Chest Compression Device on chest compression quality during extended pediatric manikin resuscitation: a randomized crossover pilot study . Disaster Emerg Med J. 2017; 2(2): 58–63.
  2. Kleinman ME, Brennan EE, Goldberger ZD, et al. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015; 132(18 Suppl 2): S414–S435.
  3. Szarpak L, Karczewska K, Evrin T, et al. Comparison of intubation through the McGrath MAC, GlideScope, AirTraq, and Miller Laryngoscope by paramedics during child CPR: a randomized crossover manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 33(7): 946–950.
  4. Szarpak L, Truszewski Z, Vitale J, et al. Exchange of supraglottic airways for endotracheal tube using the Eschmann Introducer during simulated child resuscitation: A randomized study comparing 4 devices. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017; 96(26): e7177.
  5. Szarpak Ł, Kurowski A, Truszewski Z, et al. Comparison of 4 supraglotttic devices used by paramedics during simulated CPR : a randomized controlled crossover trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 33(8): 1084–1088.
  6. Kurowski A, Szarpak Ł, Bogdański Ł, et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation with standard manual chest compressions and the use of TrueCPR and PocketCPR feedback devices. Kardiol Pol. 2015; 73(10): 924–930.
  7. Truszewski Z, Szarpak L, Kurowski A, et al. Randomized trial of the chest compressions effectiveness comparing 3 feedback CPR devices and standard basic life support by nurses. Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34(3): 381–385.
  8. Smereka J, Szarpak L, Smereka A, et al. Evaluation of new two-thumb chest compression technique for infant CPR performed by novice physicians. A randomized, crossover, manikin trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2017; 35(4): 604–609.
  9. Kaminska H, Wieczorek W, Matusik P, et al. Factors influencing high-quality chest compressions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario, according to 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines. Kardiol Pol. 2018; 76(3): 642–647.
  10. Abelairas-Gómez C, Barcala-Furelos R, Szarpak Ł, et al. The effect of strength training on quality of prolonged basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Kardiol Pol. 2017; 75(1): 21–27.

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: viamedica@viamedica.pl