Vol 7, No 2 (2022)
Research paper
Published online: 2022-06-24

open access

Page views 4569
Article views/downloads 482
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

A comparative study on effectiveness of workshop education versus education via mobile learning (m-learning) in developing medical students’ knowledge and skill about cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Maliheh Abdollahi1, Gholam Abbas Valizadeh2, Leila Bazrafkan3, Mohammadreza Dehghani3, Mostafa Bijani4
Disaster Emerg Med J 2022;7(2):83-89.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: A variety of educational approaches are being used today to improve learning in the field of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Therefore, the present study was conducted to compare workshop education with education via mobile learning (M-learning) in terms of their efficacy in developing medical students’ knowledge and skills about cardiopulmonary resuscitation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present study was quasi-experimental performed on 60 interns selected from a university of medical sciences in southwest Iran. Participants were assigned to either the workshop education group (n = 30) or the mobile learning group (n = 30). Before and after the intervention, the knowledge and skills of the participants in terms of basic and advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation were measured by a questionnaire. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Independent-Samples t-Test, Paired-Samples t-Test, and Chi-Square Test in SPSS software v. 22. RESULTS: Education via mobile learning caused a significant increase in the participants’ knowledge about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (p < 0.05). However, this method did not result in a significant difference in the participants’ skill scores, while the workshop education group showed a significant increase in their cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill scores (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that education via mobile learning was better in enhancing medical students’ knowledge about cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, workshop education was more effective in developing practical skills in the field of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Accordingly, educators are recommended to employ a combination of mobile learning and workshop education for achieving better results.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Jarrah S, Judeh M, AbuRuz ME. Evaluation of public awareness, knowledge and attitudes towards basic life support: a cross-sectional study. BMC Emerg Med. 2018; 18(37).
  2. Matsuura TR, Bartos JA, Tsangaris A, et al. Early Effects of Prolonged Cardiac Arrest and Ischemic Postconditioning during Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation on Cardiac and Brain Mitochondrial Function in Pigs. Resuscitation. 2017; 116: 8–15.
  3. Cheskes S, Byers A, Zhan C, et al. Rescu Epistry Investigators. CPR quality during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest transport. Resuscitation. 2017; 114: 34–39.
  4. Baldi E, Contri E, Bailoni A, et al. Final-year medical students' knowledge of cardiac arrest and CPR: We must do more! Int J Cardiol. 2019; 296: 76–80.
  5. Willmore RD, Veljanoski D, Ozdes F, et al. Do medical students studying in the United Kingdom have an adequate factual knowledge of basic life support? World J Emerg Med. 2019; 10(2): 75–80.
  6. Pyo MY, Kim JY, Sohn JO, et al. The Effects of an Advanced Cardiac Life Support Training via Smartphone's Simulation Application on Nurses' Knowledge and Learning Satisfaction. J Korean Clin Nurse Res. 2012; 18(2): 228–38.
  7. Sasson C, Rogers MAM, Dahl J, et al. Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010; 3(1): 63–81.
  8. Beskind DL, Stolz U, Thiede R, et al. Viewing a brief chest-compression-only CPR video improves bystander CPR performance and responsiveness in high school students: A cluster randomized trial. Resuscitation. 2016; 104: 28–33.
  9. McCurry MK, Martins DC. Teaching undergraduate nursing research: a comparison of traditional and innovative approaches for success with millennial learners. J Nurs Educ. 2010; 49(5): 276–279.
  10. Scicluna HA, Grimm MC, O'Sullivan AJ, et al. Clinical capabilities of graduates of an outcomes-based integrated medical program. BMC Med Educ. 2012; 12: 23.
  11. Dehghani A, Kojuri J, Dehghani MR, et al. Experiences of students and faculty members about using virtual social networks in education: A qualitative content analysis. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2019; 7(2): 86–94.
  12. Mehdipour Y. Medical students' life and virtual social networks a guide for educational managers and parents. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019; 8(8): 2573–2576.
  13. Sarbaz M, Banaye Yazdipour A, Kimiafar K. Use of Social Networks for Learning Purposes Among Medical and Paramedical Sciences Students, Mashhad, Iran. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019; 258: 105–109.
  14. Green BL, Kennedy I, Hassanzadeh H, et al. A semi-quantitative and thematic analysis of medical student attitudes towards M-Learning. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015; 21(5): 925–930.
  15. Chase TJG, Julius A, Chandan JS, et al. Mobile learning in medicine: an evaluation of attitudes and behaviours of medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2018; 18(152).
  16. Rose S. Medical Student Education in the Time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020; 323(21): 2131–2132.
  17. Longitudinal Study of CardioPulmonary Resuscitation Knowledge and Skills among Nurse Interns of Kashan University of Medical Sciences URL: http://ijme.mui.ac.ir/article-1-2269-en.html. Iran J Med Edu. 2013; 13(2): 134–145.
  18. Zia Ziabari SM, Monsef Kasmaei V, Khoshgozaran L, et al. Continuous Education of Basic Life Support (BLS) through Social Media; a Quasi-Experimental Study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019; 7(1): e4.
  19. Najafi Ghezeljeh T, Mohammad Aliha J, Haghani H, et al. Effect of education using the virtual social network on the knowledge and attitude of emergency nurses of disaster preparedness: A quasi-experiment study. Nurse Educ Today. 2019; 73: 88–93.
  20. Moazami F, Bahrampour E, Azar MR, et al. Comparing two methods of education (virtual versus traditional) on learning of Iranian dental students: a post-test only design study. BMC Med Educ. 2014; 14: 45.
  21. Ahn JiY, Cho GC, Shon YD, et al. Effect of a reminder video using a mobile phone on the retention of CPR and AED skills in lay responders. Resuscitation. 2011; 82(12): 1543–1547.
  22. Alijanpour E, Amri-maleh P, Khafri S, et al. Assessment of different cardio-pulmonary resuscitation teaching approach on quality of education in medical student, Babol 2011. Med J Mashad Univ Med Sci. 2014; 56(6): 376–382.
  23. Nord A, Svensson L, Hult H, et al. Effect of mobile application-based versus DVD-based CPR training on students' practical CPR skills and willingness to act: a cluster randomised study. BMJ Open. 2016; 6(4): e010717.
  24. Ghorbani S, Ghafourifard M, Dinmohammadi M, et al. Comparison of CPR training by social media networks and workshop on CPR skill of nursing and midwifery students. .
  25. Moon H, Hyun HS. Nursing students' knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy in blended learning of cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med Educ. 2019; 19(1): 414.
  26. Park JuY, Woo CH, Yoo JY. Effects of Blended Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Defibrillation E-learning on Nursing Students' Self-efficacy, Problem Solving, and Psychomotor Skills. Comput Inform Nurs. 2016; 34(6): 272–280.
  27. Reder S, Cummings P, Quan L. Comparison of three instructional methods for teaching cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of an automatic external defibrillator to high school students. Resuscitation. 2006; 69(3): 443–453.



Disaster and Emergency Medicine Journal