Evaluating the quality of medical content on YouTube: an analysis of chest tube procedures
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Chest tube insertion is a vital procedure for managing pneumothorax, haemothorax, and pleural effusion, requiring precise training for effective outcomes. Platforms like YouTube provide accessible educational content, but their unregulated nature raises concerns about accuracy. Evaluating the quality and relevance of these videos is essential to determine their value as training tools. This study assesses YouTube’s potential as an educational resource for chest tube insertion, a critical interventional procedure.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted, analysing 136 English-language videos on chest tube insertion published between 2016 and 2024. Videos were selected using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, categorized based on their source, and evaluated for procedural accuracy and visual representation using a structured 10-point scoring system.
RESULTS: The findings revealed that healthcare professionals and official institutions were the primary producers of the videos. However, video quality did not significantly differ based on the source. Longer videos provided more comprehensive procedural information and visual detail. Metrics such as views, likes, and comments varied widely but showed no correlation with video quality scores.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that while YouTube provides an accessible platform for medical education, its unregulated nature presents challenges in ensuring content quality and reliability. Collaborative efforts between healthcare organizations and content creators are crucial for developing standardized guidelines to improve the educational value of online resources. Additionally, integrating media literacy training into medical education programs is essential to equip healthcare professionals with the skills needed to critically evaluate and effectively utilize online content.
Keywords: chest tubepulmonary surgical proceduresmedical educationhealth literacyYouTube
References
- Kalina J. Chater 15 - Pandemic-driven innovations contribute to the develoment of information-based medicine. In: de Pablos PO, Chui KT, Lytras MD. ed. Digital innovation for healthcare in COVID-19 pandemic. Academic Press 2022: 245–262.
- Wang X, Liu T, Wang J, et al. Understanding learner continuance intention: a comparison of live video learning, pre-recorded video learning and hybrid video learning in COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction. 2021; 38(3): 263–281.
- Parkes P, Pillay TD, Bdaiwi Y, et al. Telemedicine interventions in six conflict-affected countries in the WHO Eastern Mediterranean region: a systematic review. Confl Health. 2022; 16(1): 64.
- Alser K, Mallah SI, El-Oun YR, et al. Trauma care supported through a global telemedicine initiative during the 2023-24 military assault on the Gaza Strip, occupied Palestinian territory: a case series. Lancet. 2024; 404(10455): 874–886.
- Mao BP, Teichroeb ML, Lee T, et al. Is online video-based education an effective method to teach basic surgical skills to students and surgical trainees? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Educ. 2022; 79(6): 1536–1545.
- Rapp AK, Healy MG, Charlton ME, et al. YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J Surg Educ. 2016; 73(6): 1072–1076.
- Katipoğlu B, Akbaş İ, Koçak AO, et al. Assessment of the accuracy of cardiopulmonary resuscitation videos in english on YouTube according to the 2015 AHA resuscitation guidelines. Emerg Med Int. 2019; 2019: 1272897.
- Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning: evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. Am Psychol. 2008; 63(8): 760–769.
- Glass NE, Kulaylat AN, Zheng F, et al. A national survey of educational resources utilized by the Resident and Associate Society of the American College of surgeons membership. Am J Surg. 2015; 209(1): 59–64.
- Fehervari M, Das B, Soleimani-Nouri P, et al. Can surgical skills be taught using technological advances online? A comparative study of online and face-to-face surgical skills training. Surg Endosc. 2022; 36(6): 4631–4637.
- Işık NI, Kurtoglu Celık G, Işık B. Evaluating emergency department visits for spontaneous and traumatic pneumomediastinum: a retrospective analysis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2024; 30(2): 107–113.
- Anderson D, Chen SA, Godoy LA, et al. Comprehensive review of chest tube management: a review. JAMA Surg. 2022; 157(3): 269–274.
- Subedi A, Banjade P, Joshi S, et al. Updates on British Thoracic Society statement on pleural disease and procedures 2023. Open Respir Med J. 2023; 17: e18743064286775.
- Pandey A, Patni N, Singh M, et al. YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Prev Med. 2010; 38(3): e1–e3.
- Yıldırım B, Basaran O, Alatas OD, et al. Chest tube insertion techniques on YouTube: is social media a reliable source of learning medical skills? Am J Emerg Med. 2015; 33(11): 1709–1710.
- Kıvrak A, Ulusoy İ. How high is the quality of the videos about children's elbow fractures on YouTube? J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1): 166.
- Göller Bulut D, Paksoy T, Ustaoğlu G. Is online video a suitable source to obtain sufficient and useful information about peri-implantitis? J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023; 81(1): 56–64.
- Ozdemir Kacer E, Kacer I. Evaluating the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on scabies in children: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2024; 19(10): e0310508.
- Thoracostomy tubes and catheters: Placement techniques and complications, 2023. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/thoracostomy-tubes-and-catheters-placement-techniques-and-complications?search=chest%20tube&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1%7E150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1. (16.01.2025).
- Roberts ME, Rahman NM, Maskell NA, et al. BTS Pleural Guideline Development Group. British Thoracic Society Guideline for pleural disease. Thorax. 2023; 78(Suppl 3): s1–s42.
- Dev SP, Nascimiento B, Simone C, et al. Videos in clinical medicine. Chest-tube insertion. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(15): e15.
- Kocyigit BF, Akaltun MS, Sahin AR. YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 and rheumatic disease link. Clin Rheumatol. 2020; 39(7): 2049–2054.
- Szmuda T, Syed MT, Singh A, et al. YouTube as a source of patient information for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A content-quality and audience engagement analysis. Rev Med Virol. 2020; 30(5): e2132.
- Ozduran E, Büyükçoban S. A content analysis of the reliability and quality of Youtube videos as a source of information on health-related post-COVID pain. PeerJ. 2022; 10: e14089.
- Chang MC, Lee BJ, Park D. The quality, reliability, and accuracy of videos regarding exercises and management for dysphagia in pediatric populations uploaded on youtube. Children (Basel). 2022; 9(10).
- Krakowiak M, Rak M, Krakowiak P, et al. YouTube as a source of information on carbon monoxide poisoning: a content-quality analysis. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2022; 35(3): 285–295.
- Butler DP, Perry F, Shah Z, et al. The quality of video information on burn first aid available on YouTube. Burns. 2013; 39(5): 856–859.
- Hawryluk NM, Stompór M, Joniec EZ. Concerns of quality and reliability of educational videos focused on frailty syndrome on YouTube platform. Geriatrics (Basel). 2021; 7(1).
- Cheng A, Nadkarni VM, Mancini MB, et al. American Heart Association Education Science Investigators; and on behalf of the American Heart Association Education Science and Programs Committee, Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Resuscitation education science: educational strategies to improve outcomes from cardiac arrest: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018; 138(6): e82–e8e122.
- Trueger NS, Murray H, Kobner S, et al. Global emergency medicine journal club: a social media discussion about the outpatient management of patients with spontaneous pneumothorax by using pigtail catheters. Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 66(4): 409–416.
- Videos AI. Youtube. 27:07 ed: ALiEM-Annals EM Journal Club with Dr. Jouneau; 2014. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AhYZJF4sJoI&ab_channel=ALiEMInteractiveVideos (19.01.2025).
- Kaval ME, Sarsar F, Buduneli N, et al. A sustainable, self-sufficient peer review algorithm for health-related YouTube videos: A proposal. Oral Dis. 2024; 30(3): 830–832.
- Fyfield M, Henderson M, Phillips M. Navigating four billion videos: teacher search strategies and the YouTube algorithm. Learning, Media and Technology. 2020; 46(1): 47–59.