Online first
Research paper
Published online: 2024-12-19

open access

Page views 14
Article views/downloads 6
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Patient rights in self-assessment of nurses and paramedics of hospital emergency departments

Bartlomiej Chmielowiec1, Jaroslaw P. Chmielewski2, Grzegorz Witkowski3, Karol Bielski4, Agnieszka Chruscikowska2, Mariusz Jaworski5, Roman Starz6, Dorota Rebak3

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In Poland, the function of accident admissions is performed by admission rooms and hospital emergency departments. The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 has radically changed the functioning of the healthcare system. The introduction of the state of epidemic emergency in  Poland, followed by the state of the epidemic, was the basis for imposing several restrictions that had a significant impact on the execution of patients’ basic rights. The aim of this study was the analysis of the attitudes exhibited by the emergency department medical personnel regarding the rights held by patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study involved 124 respondents employed in hospital emergency departments. The participants of the study were selected in such a way that paramedics accounted for half (50%) of the participants and nurses constituted the other half. In the study group, males accounted for 54.8% of the participants, while females accounted for 45.2%.  41.1% of respondents held a master’s degree, 25% declared higher professional education and 33.9% declared vocational secondary vocational education. The research used the following methods: a diagnostic survey, anonymous surveys, and a self-developed questionnaire consisting of 15 questions. The statistical analysis was carried out in the Statistica SPSS — IBM SPSS statistical package (Version 28.0.1.0; IBM Corporation, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). For the analysis of the gathered quantitative data, differentiated concerning the independent variable of education, the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U and the Chi2 tests were used at a significance level of  α = 0.05. RESULTS: According to 74.20% of the participants, they became familiar with patient rights during their work experience, while only 25.80% of them did so during their education. A satisfactory level of knowledge regarding patient rights was found among 58.10% of all respondents. The most familiar patient right among 88.70% of respondents (90.30% of the nurses, 87.10% of the paramedics) is the patient right to health services. 77.40% of participants adhere to patient rights in their daily work. According to 88.70% of respondents, the requirements under patient rights apply to all healthcare professionals. The most common violation in the work process, according to 65.30% of respondents, is the patient right to respect for privacy and dignity of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: (1) Almost 90% of respondents expressed the opinion that patient rights concern all healthcare professionals, and ca. 80% of them declared that they always adhere to them in their daily professional work. (2) The most familiar patient right among almost all respondents is the right to healthcare services, while the least familiar is the patient right to store valuables in the depository. (3) The statistical analysis carried out for this study did not show any statistically significant differences in the presented level of knowledge and declared attitudes concerning patient rights, taking into account the division between paramedics and nurses.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Ustawa z dnia 8 września 2006 r. o Państwowym Ratownictwie Medycznym (Dz.U. 2006 nr 191 poz. 1410, ze zm).
  2. Starczewska M, Brosz P. Analysis of medical services provided in the Emergency Department. Pielęgniarstwo Chirurgiczne i Angiologiczne/Surgical and Vascular Nursing. 2020; 14(1): 31–37.
  3. Wyrok Naczelnego Sądu Administracyjnego z dnia 17 stycznia 2017 r. sygn. akt II OSK 2619/16).
  4. Castanheira-Pinto A, Gonçalves B, Lima R, et al. Modeling, Assessment and Design of an Emergency Department of a Public Hospital through Discrete-Event Simulation. Applied Sciences. 2021; 11(2): 805.
  5. Najwyższa Izba Kontroli. Funkcjonowanie Szpitali w warunkach pandemii COVID-19. Warszawa 2022. https://www.nik.gov.pl/plik/id,26701,v,artykul_25465.pdf (03.03.2024).
  6. MROŻEK Ż. HOSPITAL ACTIVITIES DURING AN EMERGENCY BASED ON THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC EXPERIENCE. National Security Studies. 2023; 31(1): 37–56.
  7. GUS. Zdrowie i ochrona zdrowia w 2022 roku. Warszawa 2023. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/zdrowie/zdrowie/zdrowie-i-ochrona-zdrowia-w-2022-roku,1,13.html (03.03.2024).
  8. Rzecznik Praw Pacjenta. Raport: Problematyka zgłoszeń kierowanych na Infolinię Rzecznika Praw Pacjenta w 2021 roku. https://www.gov.pl/web/rpp/raporty-za-rok-2021 (03.03.2024).
  9. Wesołowski K. On respecting patient’s right to information during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Polish health care system. Medyczna Wokanda. 2021; 16(16): 67–73.
  10. Chmielowiec B, Raczek M, Chmielewski J, et al. Accessibility to healthcare services in Poland at the initial stage of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic – patient perspective. Medycyna Ogólna i Nauki o Zdrowiu. 2022; 28(3): 208–216.
  11. Wołoszyn-Cichocka A. Right to Information about Patient’s Health during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio G (Ius). 2022; 69(1): 195–208.
  12. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. JAMA. 2013; 310(20): 2191.
  13. Szpringer M, Chmielewski J, Kosecka J, et al. Patients’ satisfaction as one of the aspects of the quality of health care. Medycyna Ogólna i Nauki o Zdrowiu. 2015; 21(2): 132–137.
  14. Trzcińska H. Patient satysfaction in selected aspects of the assessment of quality of medical services. Studia Ekonomiczne. Gospodarka, Społeczeństwo, Środowisko. 2019; 1(3): 119–139.
  15. Sobczak K, Leoniuk K, Janaszczyk A. Delivering bad news in the perspective of patient rights. Pomeranian Journal of Life Sciences. 2021; 66(3): 31–35.
  16. Frydrysiak K, Ejdukiewicz J, Grześkowiak M. Agresja pacjentów i ich bliskich wobec personelu Szpitalnego Oddziału Ratunkowego. Anestezjologia i Ratownictwo. 2016(10): 46–52.
  17. Gonczaryk A, Chmielewski J, Strzelecka A, et al. AGGRESSION TOWARDS PARAMEDICS IN EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAMS. Emergency Medical Service. 2022; 9(2): 155–161.
  18. Czajkowska M, Janik A, Zborowska K, et al. Knowledge and opinions of patients and medical staff about patients' rights. Ginekol Pol. 2021; 92(7): 491–497.
  19. Weiner BA, Wettstein RM. Confidentiality of patient-related information. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112(8): 1032–1036.
  20. Beltran-Aroca CM, Labella F, Font-Ugalde P, et al. Assessment of Doctors' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Confidentiality in Hospital Care. Sci Eng Ethics. 2019; 25(5): 1531–1548.
  21. Elger BS. Violations of medical confidentiality: opinions of primary care physicians. Br J Gen Pract. 2009; 59(567): e344–e352.
  22. Beltran-Aroca CM, Girela-Lopez E, Collazo-Chao E, et al. Confidentiality breaches in clinical practice: what happens in hospitals? BMC Med Ethics. 2016; 17(1): 52.
  23. Karasneh R, Al-Mistarehi AH, Al-Azzam S, et al. Physicians' Knowledge, Perceptions, and Attitudes Related to Patient Confidentiality and Data Sharing. Int J Gen Med. 2021; 14: 721–731.
  24. Kiyancicek Z, Dedeli O, Yildiz E, et al. A survey: Health professionals’ attitude towards patient rights and patient safety. Asian Journal of Pharmacy, Nursing and Medical Sciences. 2014; 2(1).
  25. Ustawa z dnia 8 września 2006 r. o Państwowym Ratownictwie Medycznym (Dz.U. 2006 nr 191 poz. 1410, ze zm).
  26. Mohammed T, Woldearegay E, Kedir S, et al. Patient safety knowledge, attitude and practice among undergraduate health science students in South West Ethiopia. Front Public Health. 2022; 10: 1064896.