Online first
Review paper
Published online: 2024-09-25

open access

Page views 314
Article views/downloads 156
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Artificial intelligence for the prediction of health emergencies and disasters

Paula Andrea Ramos Chaparro1, Erwin Hernando Hernández Rincón1, Gabriela Alejandra Osorio Betancourt1, Nicolas Melo Sierra1, María del Mar Moreno Gómez2, Claudia Liliana Jaimes Peñuela1

Abstract

Amidst unprecedented global health challenges, exemplified by the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and other natural disasters, the imperative for initiative-taking measures is evident. Resilient Health Systems, initiated by PAHO/WHO, seeks to fortify preparedness. This study explores the pivotal role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) advancements in addressing health crises. A scoping review was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and LILACS databases. Limited to 2013–2024. Inclusion criteria: freely accessible articles in Spanish, English, or Portuguese on AI in disaster prediction and management. Removed duplicates and irrelevant languages. Subjective selection based on abstract and title. Grouped articles into two categories. Key information was extracted for analysis. Findings underscore the need for targeted exploration in AI applications for epidemic prediction. Ongoing exploration is evident, with a particular emphasis on specific symptom-based predictions. Beyond epidemics, AI excels in predicting a spectrum of natural disasters globally, from sea-level changes to earthquakes. Noteworthy successes include cyclone and flood predictions. Challenges, such as real-time updates, regional complexities, and global communication, must be addressed for widespread adoption. AI is a pivotal force in transforming healthcare and disaster management. The path forward involves a cohesive integration of technological innovation, ethical considerations, and global cooperation to fully unleash the benefits of AI for public health.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Marazziti D, Cianconi P, Mucci F, et al. Climate change, environment pollution, COVID-19 pandemic and mental health. Sci Total Environ. 2021; 773: 145182.
  2. Castañeda-Guillot C, Ramos-Serpa G. Major pandemics in human history. Cuban Journal of Pediatrics. 2020; 92(0). https://revpediatria.sld.cu/index.php/ped/article/view/1183.
  3. BBC News Mundo. Los 10 terremotos más potentes y mortíferos de la historia en América Latina; 2017. https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-america-latina-41343606.
  4. United Nations. International Day of Epidemic Preparedness; 2020. https://www.un.org/es/observances/epidemic-preparedness-day.
  5. PAHO. Prevention and control of epidemics and pandemics: Strengthening the capacity of countries to prevent and control epidemics and pandemics caused by pathogenic agents of great impact or serious consequences; 2020. https://www3.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_docman&view=download&alias=50287-prevencion-y-control-de-epidemias-y-pandemias-resultado-24&category_slug=desastres-espanol-1854&Itemid=270&lang=en.
  6. Fitzgerald J. [Recommendations for the development of resilient health systems in the AmericasRecomendações para o desenvolvimento de sistemas de saúde resilientes nas Américas]. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2023; 47: e101.
  7. Schwalbe N, Wahl B. Artificial intelligence and the future of global health. Lancet. 2020; 395(10236): 1579–1586.
  8. Benke K, Benke G. Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in Public Health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(12).
  9. Chan JL, Purohit H. Challenges to Transforming Unconventional Social Media Data into Actionable Knowledge for Public Health Systems During Disasters. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2020; 14(3): 352–359.
  10. Bellocchio F, Carioni P, Lonati C, et al. Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance System for COVID-19 Outbreak Prediction in a Large European Dialysis Clinics Network. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(18).
  11. Kellner D, Lowin M, Hinz O. Improved healthcare disaster decision-making utilizing information extraction from complementary social media data during the COVID-19 pandemic. Decis Support Syst. 2023 [Epub ahead of print]: 113983.
  12. Monaghan CK, Larkin JW, Chaudhuri S, et al. Machine Learning for Prediction of Patients on Hemodialysis with an Undetected SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Kidney360. 2021; 2(3): 456–468.
  13. Yang Z, Zeng Z, Wang Ke, et al. Modified SEIR and AI prediction of the epidemics trend of COVID-19 in China under public health interventions. J Thorac Dis. 2020; 12(3): 165–174.
  14. Tsatsoulis C, Amthauer HA. Finding clusters of similar events within clinical incident reports: a novel methodology combining case based reasoning and information retrieval. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12 Suppl 2(Suppl 2): ii24–ii32.
  15. Alshouny A, Elnabwy M, Kaloop M, et al. An integrated framework for improving sea level variation prediction based on the integration Wavelet-Artificial Intelligence approaches. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2022; 152: 105399.
  16. Huang X, Luo M, Jin H. Application of improved ELM algorithm in the prediction of earthquake casualties. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6): e0235236.
  17. Gul M, Guneri A. An artificial neural network-based earthquake casualty estimation model for Istanbul city. Natural Hazards. 2016; 84(3): 2163–2178.
  18. Xing H, Junyi S, Jin H. The casualty prediction of earthquake disaster based on Extreme Learning Machine method. Natural Hazards. 2020; 102(3): 873–886.
  19. Kim J, Campbell P, Calhoun K. A Framework to Predict Community Risk from Severe Weather Threats Using Probabilistic Hazard Information (PHI). Atmosphere. 2023; 14(5): 767.
  20. Ian VK, Tang SK, Pau G. Assessing the Risk of Extreme Storm Surges from Tropical Cyclones under Climate Change Using Bidirectional Attention-Based LSTM for Improved Prediction. Atmosphere. 2023; 14(12): 1749.
  21. Chand C, Ali MM, Himasri B, et al. Predicting Indian Ocean Cyclone Parameters Using an Artificial Intelligence Technique. Atmosphere. 2022; 13(7): 1157.
  22. Ahmed F, Loc H, Park E, et al. Comparison of Different Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Predict Floods in Jhelum River, Pakistan. Water. 2022; 14(21): 3533.
  23. Saravi S, Kalawsky R, Joannou D, et al. Use of Artificial Intelligence to Improve Resilience and Preparedness Against Adverse Flood Events. Water. 2019; 11(5): 973.
  24. Tengtrairat N, Woo WL, Parathai P, et al. Automated Landslide-Risk Prediction Using Web GIS and Machine Learning Models. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(13).
  25. Guikema S. Artificial Intelligence for Natural Hazards Risk Analysis: Potential, Challenges, and Research Needs. Risk Anal. 2020; 40(6): 1117–1123.
  26. Kuglitsch MM, Pelivan I, Ceola S, et al. Facilitating adoption of AI in natural disaster management through collaboration. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1): 1579.
  27. Lu S, Christie GA, Nguyen TT, et al. Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Disasters and Public Health Emergencies. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022; 16(4): 1674–1681.
  28. WHO. Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200.