Effectiveness of primary health care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during the COVID-19 pandemic and factors affecting it
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Investigation of the performance of primary health care in Kazakhstan during the COVID-19 pandemic and analysing the factors influencing it is critical to improving healthcare in the face of global challenges. The purpose of this study was to identify and analyse the factors affecting the efficacy of primary health care in the Republic of Kazakhstan during the COVID-19 pandemic.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study design consisted of a two-stage data collection on primary health care in Kazakhstan during the COVID-19 pandemic, including a questionnaire survey of 10,459 participants from different regions and professional groups, and the application of complex statistical methods including correlation and regression analyses.
RESULTS: The study found that nurses’ competence was most strongly influenced by interactions with physicians and knowledge of clinical guidelines in an epidemic setting. Statistically significant criteria such as prompt training (r = 0.081) and regular professional development (PD) (r = 0.189) showed no direct relationship with competence. General practitioners’ work during the pandemic included prompt training, provision of medicines (r = 0.519), and preventive outreach (r = 0.427). Competence of doctors and nurses was correlated (r = 0.576) with pandemic preparedness (r = 0.497) and effective health staff communication (r = 0.448).
CONCLUSIONS: Organisational management effectiveness was related to the communication skills of managers and adequate resourcing of the clinic, where besides staff competence (r = 0.494), prompt provision of medicines and equipment (r = 0.759) played a significant role. Practical significance lies in the possibility of using the findings of this study to improve the efficiency of organisational work of primary healthcare institutions in Kazakhstan during pandemic and post-pandemic conditions.
Keywords: coronavirushealth workerssurveypandemicprofessional development
References
- Omar NO, Stepkina YL. Assessment of the activities of ambulance and emergency medical care in the Almaty region in the context of coronavirus infection. Cent Asian Sci Pract J Public Health. 2021; 3: 89–92.
- Sagatkali AS, Tussupkaliyeva K, Urazaуeva ST, et al. Analysis of Mortality from COVID-19 in the Atyrau Region during the Outbreak in 2020. ЗДОРОВЬЕ НАСЕЛЕНИЯ И СРЕДА ОБИТАНИЯ - ЗНиСО / PUBLIC HEALTH AND LIFE ENVIRONMENT. 2022: 18–23.
- Mukhamedyarova AB, Rakhypbekov TK, et al. Te impact of COVID-19 on the performance of primary health care service providers in a capitation payment system in the Republic of Kazakhstan. 2021; 23(5): 6–12.
- Yerniyazov NB, Aringazina A. IMPACT OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON NEUROSURGICAL SERVICES. Bull Kazakh Natl Med Univ. 2021(1): 335–339.
- Adilbekov EB, Akhmetzhanova ZB, Adilbekova BB, et al. ORGANIZATION OF STROKE SERVICE DURING CORONAVIRUS INFECTION PANDEMIA (SARS-COV-2) IN THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN. Нейрохирургия и неврология Казахстана. 2021(1): 40–53.
- Utaganov B. Features of providing emergency medical care during a pandemic (literature review). Cent Asian Sci Pract J Public Health. 2021; 3: 104–116.
- Lee YY, Medford ARL, Halim AS. Burnout in physicians. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015; 45(2): 104–107.
- Jalil A, Mahmood QK, Fischer F. Young medical doctors' perspectives on professionalism: a qualitative study conducted in public hospitals in Pakistan. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020; 20(1): 847.
- Goyal A, Ish P. Young doctors for UK-India telemedicine and COVID-19: the need of the hour. QJM. 2022; 115(7): 497.
- Hassamal S, Dong F, Hassamal S, et al. The Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Hospital Staff. West J Emerg Med. 2021; 22(2): 346–352.
- Montagna E, Donohoe J, Zaia V, et al. Transition to clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study of young doctors' experiences in Brazil and Ireland. BMJ Open. 2021; 11(9): e053423.
- To KKW, Sridhar S, Chiu KHY, et al. Lessons learned 1 year after SARS-CoV-2 emergence leading to COVID-19 pandemic. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2021; 10(1): 507–535.
- Kaye AD, Okeagu CN, Pham AD, et al. Economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare facilities and systems: International perspectives. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2021; 35(3): 293–306.
- Iddrisu M, Poku CA, Mensah E, et al. Work-related psychosocial challenges and coping strategies among nursing workforce during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. BMC Nurs. 2023; 22(1): 210.
- Babu GR, Khetrapal S, John DA, et al. Pandemic preparedness and response to COVID-19 in South Asian countries. Int J Infect Dis. 2021; 104: 169–174.
- Leibner ES, Baron EL, Shah RS, et al. Critical Care Simulation Education Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Patient Saf. 2022; 18(4): e810–e815.
- Liu Q, Luo D, Haase JE, et al. The experiences of health-care providers during the COVID-19 crisis in China: a qualitative study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020; 8(6): e790–e798.
- Mulyadi M, Dedi B, Hou WL, et al. Nurses' experiences of emergency department triage during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2022; 54(1): 15–23.
- Labrague LJ, de Los Santos JA. Fear of COVID-19, psychological distress, work satisfaction and turnover intention among frontline nurses. J Nurs Manag. 2021; 29(3): 395–403.
- Gilbert A, Ghuysen A. Triage in the time of COVID-19. Lancet Digit Health. 2022; 4(4): e210–e211.
- Alhaidari F, Almuhaideb A, Alsunaidi S, et al. E-Triage Systems for COVID-19 Outbreak: Review and Recommendations. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(8).
- Türkkan A. Health systems in the COVID-19 pandemic: The case of Kazakhstan. Community Physician. 2022; 37(5): 323–329.