Vol 22, No 4 (2018)
Original paper
Published online: 2018-10-08

open access

Page views 996
Article views/downloads 867
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

The prevalence of arterial hypertension depending on selected demographic factors among adult residents of eastern Poland district

Monika Klimek1, Paulina Mulawka2, Tytus Tulwin3, Grzegorz Jan Dzida2
Arterial Hypertension 2018;22(4):177-178.

Abstract

Background. Identification and analysis of risk factors are important aspects of planning the long-term actions to
prevent, early diagnose and properly treat hypertension. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of hypertension and to determine the relationship between the prevalence of hypertension and selected sociodemographic
factors among adult residents of a typical eastern Poland district.

Material and methods. The study involved 1225 residents of the Janów Lubelski district aged between 36 and 65
years. The research methodology included a questionnaire survey. Blood pressure, body weight and height were
measured, the BMI was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed.

Results. 26.8% of subjects are treated for hypertension. 32.9% of hypertensive subjects are treated properly and
women have better control of hypertension than man (41.3% vs. 19.7%). Among subjects without treatment
for hypertension, 37.5% of them have abnormally high blood pressure and it is more common in men (58.9%
vs. 43.4%). The prevalence of hypertension increased with age. The percentages are from 8.6% for subjects aged
36–40 to 45.7% for subjects aged 61–65. Higher prevalence of hypertension is observed in men below the age of
50 compared to women. There is the significant rising prevalence of hypertension in women above the age of 50.
The relationship between the prevalence of hypertension and the educational background is demonstrated. Among
subjects with elementary education, the prevalence of hypertension is higher (45.5%) as compared to subjects with
higher education (18.2%). Area of residence and marital status have no effects on the prevalence of hypertension.

Conclusions. The prevalence of hypertension was lower compared to other epidemiological studies. Improvements in hypertension control have been observed for many years. The educational background has an important influence on the prevalence of hypertension. Further studies are required to establish the influence of an area of residence and marital status on the prevalence of hypertension.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Zdrojewski T, Rutkowski M, Bandosz P, Gaciong Z, Solnica B, Drygas W, Wojtyniak B, Stokwiszewski J, Pencina M, Wołkiewicz E, Piwoński J, Jędrzejczyk T, Grodzicki T, Wyrzykowski B. Ocena rozpowszechnienia i kontroli czynników ryzyka chorób serca i naczyń w Polsce – badania NATPOL 1997, 2002, 2011. In: Kopeć G, Jankowski P, Pająk A, Drygas W. ed. Epidemiologia i prewencja chorób układu krążenia. Medycyna Praktyczna, Kraków 2015: 57–64.
  2. Tykarski A, Posadzy-Małaczyńska A, Wyrzykowski B, et al. Rozpowszechnienie nadciśnienia tętniczego oraz skuteczność jego leczenia u dorosłych mieszkańców naszego kraju. Wyniki programu WOBASZ. Kardiol Pol. 2005; 63(Suppl IV): S614–S619.
  3. Jóźwiak J, Mastej M, Windak A, Tomasik T, Lukas W, Skowron Ł. Rozpowszechnienie klasycznych czynników ryzyka chorób sercowo-naczyniowych w populacji 13 724 pacjentów POZ w Polsce. Wyniki badania LIPIDOGRAM2015 & LIPIDOGEN2015. In: Kardiologia prewencyjna 2017: wytyczne, wątpliwości, gorące tematy. X Konferencja Naukowa Sekcji Prewencji i Epidemiologii PTK Kraków, 17–18 listopada 2017. , Kraków 2017: 87.
  4. Drygas W, Bielecki W, Kozakiewicz K, Pająk A, Piotrowski W, Tykarski A. Wieloośrodkowe Ogólnoolskie Badanie Stanu Zdrowia Ludności: WOBASZ. In: Drygas W, Kopeć G, Jankowski P, Pająk A. ed. Epidemiologia i prewencja chorób układu krążenia. Medycyna Praktyczna, Kraków 2015: 41–56.
  5. Główny Urząd Statystyczny. Stan zdrowia ludności Polski w 2014 r. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary–tematyczne/zdrowie/zdrowie/stan–zdrowia–ludnosci–polski–w–2014–r–.6.6.html (25.09.2018).
  6. Nwankwo T, Yoon SS, Burt V, et al. Hypertension among adults in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2013(133): 1–8.
  7. Sulicka J, Fornal M, Gryglewska B, et al. Wybrane czynniki ryzyka chorób sercowo-naczyniowych u pacjentów podstawowej opieki zdrowotnej. Arter Hypertens. 2006; 10(5): 370–6.
  8. Kozakiewicz K, Podolecka E, Syzdół M, et al. Relationship between education and cardiovascular risk score. Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2016; 126(5): 369–371.
  9. Klimek M, Knap J, Tulwin T, et al. Evaluation of the relationship between the incidence of diabetes and selected demographic factors. Clin Diabetol. 2018; 7(3): 145–150.
  10. Dégano IR, Marrugat J, Grau M, et al. The association between education and cardiovascular disease incidence is mediated by hypertension, diabetes, and body mass index. Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1): 12370.
  11. Kershaw KN, Droomers M, Robinson WR, et al. Quantifying the contributions of behavioral and biological risk factors to socioeconomic disparities in coronary heart disease incidence: the MORGEN study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2013; 28(10): 807–814.
  12. Chiara TDi, Scaglione A, Corrao S, et al. Education and hypertension: impact on global cardiovascular risk. Acta Cardiologica. 2017; 72(5): 507–513.
  13. Wang J, Sun W, Wells GA, et al. Differences in prevalence of hypertension and associated risk factors in urban and rural residents of the northeastern region of the People's Republic of China. A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2018; 13(4): e0195340.
  14. Molloy GJ, Stamatakis E, Randall G, et al. Marital status, gender and cardiovascular mortality: behavioural, psychological distress and metabolic explanations. Soc Sci Med. 2009; 69(2): 223–228.