English Polski
Vol 22 (2024): Continuous Publishing
Research paper
Published online: 2024-08-09

open access

Page views 422
Article views/downloads 211
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Measurement invariance and Polish norms for the Perth Empathy Scale (PES)

Paweł Larionow1, Karolina Mudło-Głagolska1, David A. Preece234
J Sex Ment Health 2024;22:1-14.

Abstract

Introduction: Originally developed in English, the Perth Empathy Scale (PES) is a 20-item self-report measure of empathy, designed to assess cognitive empathy and affective empathy across both negative and positive emotions. Recently, the Polish version of the PES was introduced, which demonstrated strong psychometric properties. Material and methods: In the present study, we aimed (1) to further examine the psychometrics of the Polish PES, with a focus on measurement invariance testing, and (2) to facilitate use of the scale by providing norms for Polish adults. Our sample included 1112 Polish-speaking adults aged 18–77 years, recruited from the general community in Poland. The PES’s factor structure and measurement invariance were verified with confirmatory factor analysis. Internal consistency reliability coefficients were assessed, and percentile rank norms were calculated. Results: The Polish version of the PES demonstrated strong factorial validity, with support for the intended 4-factor structure, and invariance across females and males. The PES scores showed good to excellent internal consistency reliability. There were gender differences in PES scores, with higher empathy in females than in males. Due to this, Polish percentile rank norms for the PES were presented for females and males separately. Conclusions: Overall, as in the first Polish study on the PES, the scale further demonstrated strong psychometric performance.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Brett JD, Becerra R, Maybery MT, et al. The psychometric assessment of empathy: development and validation of the Perth empathy scale. Assessment. 2023; 30(4): 1140–1156.
  2. Larionow P, Preece DA. The Perth Empathy Scale: psychometric properties of the Polish version and its mental health correlates. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2023; 13(11): 2615–2629.
  3. Ye Q, Liu Y, Zhang S, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and clinical application of the Perth Empathy Scale. J Clin Psychol. 2024; 80(7): 1473–1489.
  4. Hu L, Bentler P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model. 1999; 6(1): 1–55.
  5. Cheung G, Rensvold R. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Model. 2002; 9(2): 233–255.
  6. Groth-Marnat G. Handbook of Psychological Assessment (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken 2009.
  7. Baumgartner T. Tutorial: calculating percentile rank and percentile norms using SPSS. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2009; 13(4): 227–233.
  8. Bollen K, Lennox R. Conventional wisdom on measurement: a structural equation perspective. Psychol Bull. 1991; 110(2): 305–314.
  9. Beadle JN, de la Vega CE. Impact of aging on empathy: review of psychological and neural mechanisms. Front Psychiatry. 2019; 10: 331.
  10. Guariglia P, Palmiero M, Giannini AM, et al. The key role of empathy in the relationship between age and social support. Healthcare (Basel). 2023; 11(17).
  11. Larionow P, Preece D, Mudło-Głagolska K. The Polish version of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire-Short Form (PAQ-S): psychometric properties and norms. Journal of Sexual and Mental Health. 2023; 21(0).
  12. Larionow P, Preece D, Mudło-Głagolska K. Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale. Int J Cogn Ther. 2023; 16(3): 460–478.
  13. Larionow P. Anxiety and depression screening among Polish adults in 2023: Depression levels are higher than in cancer patients. Psychiatria. 2023.
  14. Charles ST, Carstensen LL. Social and emotional aging. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010; 61: 383–409.
  15. Koppelberg P, Kersting A, Suslow T. Alexithymia and interpersonal problems in healthy young individuals. BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1): 688.
  16. Peng W, Yang H, Liu Q, et al. Measurement invariance and latent mean differences of the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale across genders and across clinical and non-clinical samples. Pers Individ Differ. 2019; 151: 109466.
  17. Flanagan DP, Caltabiano LF. Test scores: a guide to understanding and using test results. In: Canter AS, Paige LZ, Roth MD. et al.. ed. helping children at home and school II: handouts for families and educators. National Association of School Psychologists, Bethesda 2004: 81–84.
  18. McNulty JP, Politis Y. Empathy, emotional intelligence and interprofessional skills in healthcare education. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2023; 54(2): 238–246.
  19. Byrne M, Campos C, Daly S, et al. The current state of empathy, compassion and person-centred communication training in healthcare: An umbrella review. Patient Educ Couns. 2024; 119: 108063.
  20. Brett J, Becerra R, Whitehouse A, et al. The valence-specific empathy imbalance hypothesis of autism: The role of autistic traits, alexithymia, emotion dysregulation, and gender differences. Pers Individ Differ. 2024; 218: 112493.