English Polski
Tom 21 (2023): Continuous Publishing
Praca badawcza (oryginalna)
Opublikowany online: 2024-02-15

dostęp otwarty

Wyświetlenia strony 530
Wyświetlenia/pobrania artykułu 238
Pobierz cytowanie

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

Eksport do Mediów Społecznościowych

The Polish version of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire-Short Form (PAQ-S): psychometric properties and norms

Paweł Larionow1, David A. Preece234, Karolina Mudło-Głagolska1
Journal of Sexual and Mental Health 2023;21.

Streszczenie

Alexithymia is a trait involving difficulties identifying feelings, difficulties describing feelings, and an externally orientated thinking style. It is an important risk factor for a range of psychopathologies, and its assessment is therefore important in research and clinical settings. Originally created in English, the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire-Short Form (PAQ-S) is a brief 6-item self-report measure of alexithymia. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the first Polish version of the PAQ-S and to provide norms to help facilitate the interpretation of PAQ-S scores. Our sample was 1115 Polish-speaking adults (661 females, 438 males, and 16 non-binary gender) aged 18–72 from the general community in Poland. The PAQ-S’s factor structure and measurement invariance was explored with confirmatory factor analysis, and the convergent and divergent validity of the questionnaire was assessed via relationships with psychopathology symptoms and well-being. As expected, the Polish PAQ-S demonstrated strong factorial validity, and was invariant across age and gender. Convergent and divergent validity was also empirically supported, and internal consistency reliability was good. Overall, the Polish PAQ-S therefore appears to have strong psychometric properties much like the original English form, with its brief format being promising for allowing robust alexithymia assessments in a range of settings. Percentile rank norms and high alexithymia cut-off scores for Polish adults are presented.

Artykuł dostępny w formacie PDF

Pokaż PDF (angielski) Pobierz plik PDF

Referencje

  1. Preece D, Becerra R, Allan A, et al. Establishing the theoretical components of alexithymia via factor analysis: Introduction and validation of the attention-appraisal model of alexithymia. Personality and Individual Differences. 2017; 119: 341–352.
  2. Preece D, Gross J. Conceptualizing alexithymia. Pers Individ Differ. 2023; 215: 112375.
  3. Nemiah JC, Sifneos PE. Psychosomatic illness: a problem in communication. Psychother Psychosom. 1970; 18(1): 154–160.
  4. Preece DA, Mehta A, Becerra R, et al. Why is alexithymia a risk factor for affective disorder symptoms? The role of emotion regulation. J Affect Disord. 2022; 296: 337–341.
  5. Preece DA, Petrova K, Mehta A, et al. Why is alexithymia a risk factor for affective disorder symptoms? The role of emotion regulation. J Affect Disord. 2022; 296: 337–341.
  6. Fava GA, Cosci F, Sonino N. Current psychosomatic practice. Psychother Psychosom. 2017; 86(1): 13–30.
  7. Bagby RM, Taylor GJ, Parker JD. The Twenty-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale—II. Convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity. J Psychosom Res. 1994; 38(1): 33–40.
  8. Bermond B, Clayton K, Liberova A, et al. A cognitive and an affective dimension of alexithymia in six languages and seven populations. Cogn Emot. 2007; 21(5): 1125–1136.
  9. Preece D, Becerra R, Robinson K, et al. The psychometric assessment of alexithymia: Development and validation of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire. Pers Individ Differ. 2018; 132: 32–44.
  10. Chan J, Becerra R, Weinborn M, et al. Assessing alexithymia across asian and western cultures: psychometric properties of the perth alexithymia questionnaire and toronto alexithymia scale-20 in singaporean and australian samples. J Pers Assess. 2023; 105(3): 396–412.
  11. Fynn DM, Preece DA, Gignac GE, et al. Assessing alexithymia in adults with acquired brain injury: Psychometric properties of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire. J Affect Disord. 2022; 302: 224–233.
  12. Kiskimska ND, Martínez-Sánchez F. Spanish Adaptation of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties. Mediterr J Clin Psychol. 2023; 11(2).
  13. Mazidi M, Azizi A, Becerra R, et al. Cross-cultural validation and measurement invariance of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire (PAQ): a study in Iran and the USA. Australian Psychologist. 2023: 1–16.
  14. Lashkari A, Dehghani M, Sadeghi-Firoozabadi V, et al. Further support for the psychometric properties of the farsi version of perth alexithymia questionnaire. Front Psychol. 2021; 12: 657660.
  15. Preece DA, Becerra R, Allan A, et al. Assessing alexithymia: Psychometric properties of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire and 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale in United States adults. Personality and Individual Differences. 2020; 166: 110138.
  16. Greene D, Hasking P, Boyes M, et al. Measurement invariance of two measures of alexithymia in students who do and who do not engage in non-suicidal self-injury and risky drinking. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment. 2020; 42(4): 808–825.
  17. Ferguson CJ, Preece D, Schweitzer R. Alexithymia in autism spectrum disorder. Australian Psychologist. 2023; 58(2): 131–137.
  18. Becerra R, Baeza CG, Fernandez AM, et al. Assessing Alexithymia: Psychometric Properties of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire in a Spanish-Speaking Sample. Front Psychiatry. 2021; 12: 710398.
  19. Larionow P, Preece DA, Khokhlova O, et al. Assessing alexithymia: psychometric properties of the Russian version of the perth alexithymia questionnaire. Clinical Psychology and Special Education. 2023; 12(1): 43–65.
  20. Larionow P, Preece DA, Mudło-Głagolska K. Assessing alexithymia across negative and positive emotions: Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire. Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13: 1047191.
  21. Preece DA, Mehta A, Petrova K, et al. The Perth Alexithymia Questionnaire-Short Form (PAQ-S): A 6-item measure of alexithymia. J Affect Disord. 2023; 325: 493–501.
  22. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, et al. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4. Psychosomatics. 2009; 50(6): 613–621.
  23. Larionow P, Mudło-Głagolska KK. The Patient Health Questionnaire–4: Factor Structure, Measurement Invariance, Latent Profile Analysis of Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms and Screening Results in Polish Adults. Advances in Cognitive Psychology. 2023; 19(2): 123–137.
  24. Wellbeing measures in primary health care/the DepCare Project: report on a WHO meeting: Stockholm, Sweden, 12–13 February 1998. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/349766 (20.09.2023).
  25. Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, et al. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015; 84(3): 167–176.
  26. Cichoń E, Kiejna A, Kokoszka A, et al. Validation of the Polish version of WHO-5 as a screening instrument for depression in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020; 159: 107970.
  27. Larionow P. Anxiety and Depression Screening Among Polish Adults in 2023: Depression Levels Are Higher Than in Cancer Patients. Psychiatria. 2023; [Ahead of Print].
  28. Hu L, Bentler P. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999; 6(1): 1–55.
  29. Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2002; 9(2): 233–255.
  30. Groth-Marnat G. Handbook of Psychological Assessment (5th Edition). John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken 2009.
  31. López-Martín E, Ardura D. El tamaño del efecto en la publicación científica. Educación XX1. 2023; 26(1): 9–17.
  32. Lenhard W, Lenhard A. Calculation of Effect Sizes. Psychometrica. https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html (25.05.2023).
  33. Baumgartner T. Tutorial: calculating percentile rank and percentile norms using SPSS. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2009; 13(4): 227–233.
  34. Flanagan DP, Caltabiano LF. Test Scores: A Guide to Understanding and Using Test Results. In: Canter AS, Paige LZ, Roth MD, Romero I, Carroll SA. ed. Helping Children at Home and School II: Handouts for Families and Educators. National Association of School Psychologists : 81–84.
  35. Putnick DL, Bornstein MH. Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: the state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Dev Rev. 2016; 41: 71–90.
  36. Larionow P, Mudło-Głagolska K. Assessment of activation, intensity and duration of positive and negative emotions: psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale – Short Form. Current Issues in Personality Psychology. 2022.
  37. Larionow P, Preece D, Mudło-Głagolska K. Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the Perth Emotional Reactivity Scale. Int J Cogn Ther. 2023; 16(3): 460–478.
  38. Larionow P, Mudło-Głagolska K, Michalak M. Towards psychosomatic medicine: psychometric properties of the polish version of the giessen subjective complaints list (GBB-8) and the prevalence of somatic symptoms in a polish community sample. Ann Univ Mariae Curie-Skłodowska Lub.-Pol. J. 2023; 35(4): 117–138.
  39. Salles BM, Maturana de Souza W, Dos Santos VA, et al. Effects of DBT-based interventions on alexithymia: a systematic review. Cogn Behav Ther. 2023; 52(2): 110–131.
  40. Samur D, Tops M, Schlinkert C, et al. Four decades of research on alexithymia: moving toward clinical applications. Front Psychol. 2013; 4: 861.



Journal of Sexual and Mental Health