Vol 26, No 6 (2021)
Research paper
Published online: 2021-09-29

open access

Page views 6113
Article views/downloads 270
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Evaluation of the rectal V30 parameter in patients diagnosed with postoperative endometrial cancer

Magdalena Łukowiak12, Grzegorz Galant3, Karolina Jezierska4, Michał Falco2, Piotr Woźniak21, Wojciech Podraza4, Janusz P. Kowalski-Stankiewicz3
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2021;26(6):899-905.


Background: The present paper reports on analysis of 184 patients who were diagnosed with endometrial cancer. The main objective of this study was to address parameter Vrec(30Gy) which determines a volume of the rectum irradiated with a dose of 30 Gy during radiotherapy.

Materials and methods: All patients were irradiated with an IMRT technique on linear accelerators. The planning target volume (PTV) contour was determined by a radiation oncologist. The clinical target volume (CTV) was drawn on CT images obtained in a prone position. For statistical analysis, appropriate tests (e.g. the Shapiro-Wilk, Wilcoxon) were used.

Results and discussion: The performed analysis showed that the recommended condition for Vrec(30Gy) is met only in 3% of patients and the observed median value exceeds 90%. The obtained results were compared with the studies in which the Vrec(30Gy) values were related to various radiotherapy techniques.

Conclusions: The analysis showed that the condition for Vrec(30Gy) is satisfied in the case of only 3% of patients. Due to the difficulty with meeting the condition, it should be reconsidered based on real results. 

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file


  1. Malicki J, Slosarek K. Planowanie leczenia i dozymetria w radioterapii. Via Medica, Gdańsk 2016.
  2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6): 394–424.
  3. Miller KD, Nogueira L, Mariotto AB, et al. Cancer treatment and survivor-ship statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69(5): 363–385.
  4. Andreyev HJN. Gastrointestinal problems after pelvic radiotherapy: the past, the present and the future. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007; 19(10): 790–799.
  5. Mitra D, Nout R, Catalano PJ, et al. Rectal bleeding after radiation therapy for endometrial cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2015; 115(2): 240–245.
  6. Kuku S, Fragkos C, McCormack M, et al. Radiation-induced bowel injury: the impact of radiotherapy on survivorship after treatment for gynaecological cancers. Br J Cancer. 2013; 109(6): 1504–1512.
  7. McKinney W. Python for Data Analysis: Data Wrangling with Pandas, NumPy, and IPython. 2 ed . O’Reilly Media, Farnham 2017.
  8. Bruce P, Bruce A. Practical Statistics for Data Scientists. 50 Essential Concepts. 1st editon. O’Reilly Media, Farnham 2017: 1491952962.
  9. Jhingran A, Winter K, Portelance L, et al. A phase II study of intensity modulated radiation therapy to the pelvis for postoperative patients with endometrial carcinoma: radiation therapy oncology group trial 0418. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84(1): e23–e28.
  10. Wu CC, Wuu YR, Yanagihara T, et al. Rectal balloon use limits vaginal displacement, rectal dose, and rectal toxicity in patients receiving IMRT for postoperative gynecological malignancies. Med Dosim. 2018; 43(1): 23–29.
  11. Hsieh CH, Wei MC, Lee HY, et al. Whole pelvic helical tomotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: technical implementation of IMRT with helical tomothearapy. Radiat Oncol. 2009; 4(1).
  12. Georg P, Georg D, Hillbrand M, et al. Factors influencing bowel sparing in intensity modulated whole pelvic radiotherapy for gynaecological malignancies. Radiother Oncol. 2006; 80(1): 19–26.
  13. Menkarios C, Azria D, Laliberté B, et al. Optimal organ-sparing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) regimen for the treatment of locally advanced anal canal carcinoma: a comparison of conventional and IMRT plans. Radiat Oncol. 2007; 2(1).
  14. Mell L, Tiryaki H, Ahn KH, et al. Dosimetric Comparison of Bone Marrow-Sparing Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Techniques for Treatment of Cervical Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008; 71(5): 1504–1510.
  15. Roeske J, Lujan A, Rotmensch J, et al. Intensity-modulated whole pelvic radiation therapy in patients with gynecologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 48(5): 1613–1621.
  16. Yavas G, Yavas C, Acar H, et al. Dosimetric comparison of 3-dimensional conformal and field-in-field radiotherapy techniques for the adjuvant treatment of early stage endometrial cancer. Phys Med. 2013; 29(6): 577–582.
  17. Panda S, Swamidas J, Chopra S, et al. Treatment planning comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy employing a dual-layer stacked multi-leaf collimator and helical tomotherapy for cervix uteri. Radiat Oncol. 2020; 15(1).
  18. Lim TY, Dragojević I, Hoffman D, et al. Characterization of the Halcyon multileaf collimator system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019; 20(4): 106–114.