Unmasking anxiety: a head-to-head comparison of open and closed masks in head and neck cancer radiotherapy
Abstract
Background: Facemasks accurately immobilise patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) receiving radiotherapy (RT). However, such masks are associated with treatment related distress, a prognostic factor for poorer survival. Open masks offer increased comfort and patient satisfaction. We investigated whether open masks could immobilise patients without affecting treatment accuracy.
Materials and methods: Over an 18-month period, all HNC RT patients with anxiety were offered open masks. Once 30 patients had completed treatment, set-up data was compared to patients in closed masks. The mean displacement and one-dimensional standard deviations (SD) of the mean, systematic and random set-up errors were calculated for translational directions: Anterior-Posterior(x), Superior-Inferior(y), Medial-Lateral (z). The mean and SD of the mean was calculated for rotational displacements. Mann-Whitney U was used to determine any significant differences between set- up data.
Results: Sixty patients were included (30 open & 30 closed masks). There was no statistically significant difference found in the x (p = 0.701), y (p = 0.246) or z (p = 0.535) direction for the SD of the mean displacements between both masks. No statistically significant difference was found in the SD of means for rotational displacements. The calculated planning target volume (PTV) margin requirements were minimally less for the closed masks 3.5, 2.6, and 2.7mm (x, y, z, respectively) versus 4.2, 3.2, and 3.7mm, respectively, for open masks.
Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that open masks maintain accuracy at levels comparable to closed masks in patients with anxiety. The minor difference in the calculated PTV margin could be rectified with daily on-line imaging or surface guided imaging.
Keywords: HNCradiotherapyimmobilisationanxietyopen-mask
References
- Borras JM, Barton M, Grau C, et al. The impact of cancer incidence and stage on optimal utilization of radiotherapy: Methodology of a population based analysis by the ESTRO-HERO project. Radiother Oncol. 2015; 116(1): 45–50.
- Gujral DM, Miah AB, Bodla S, et al. Dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy is feasible and may improve locoregional control and laryngeal preservation in laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 82(2): 539–547.
- Gujral DM, Miah AB, Bodla S, et al. Final long-term results of a phase I/II study of dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locally advanced laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancers. Oral Oncol. 2014; 50(11): 1089–1097.
- Nutting CM, Morden JP, Harrington KJ, et al. PARSPORT trial management group. Parotid-sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 12(2): 127–136.
- Theunissen EAR, Zuur CL, Yurda ML, et al. Cochlea sparing effects of intensity modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers patients: a long-term follow-up study. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 43(1): 30.
- Gilbeau L, Octave-Prignot M, Loncol T, et al. Comparison of setup accuracy of three different thermoplastic masks for the treatment of brain and head and neck tumors. Radiother Oncol. 2001; 58(2): 155–162.
- Thornton AF, Ten Haken RK, Gerhardsson A, et al. Three-dimensional motion analysis of an improved head immobilization system for simulation, CT, MRI, and PET imaging. Radiother Oncol. 1991; 20(4): 224–228.
- Rose P, Yates P. Quality of life experienced by patients receiving radiation treatment for cancers of the head and neck. Cancer Nurs. 2001; 24(4): 255–263.
- Nixon JL, Cartmill B, Turner J, et al. Exploring the prevalence and experience of mask anxiety for the person with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. J Med Radiat Sci. 2018; 65(4): 282–290.
- Clover K, Oultram S, Adams C, et al. Disruption to radiation therapy sessions due to anxiety among patients receiving radiation therapy to the head and neck area can be predicted using patient self-report measures. Psychooncology. 2011; 20(12): 1334–1341.
- Burns M, Campbell R, French S, et al. Trajectory of Anxiety Related to Radiation Therapy Mask Immobilization and Treatment Delivery in Head and Neck Cancer and Radiation Therapists’ Ability to Detect This Anxiety. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022; 7(5): 100967.
- Habboush Y, Shannon RP, Niazi SK, et al. Patient-reported distress and survival among patients receiving definitive radiation therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2017; 2(2): 211–219.
- Li G, Lovelock DM, Mechalakos J, et al. Migration from full-head mask to "open-face" mask for immobilization of patients with head and neck cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013; 14(5): 243–254.
- Mulla Z, Alwassia RK, Senan EM, et al. A comparative study between open-face and closed-face masks for head and neck cancer (HNC) in radiation therapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020; 25(3): 382–388.
- Wiant D, Squire S, Liu H, et al. A prospective evaluation of open face masks for head and neck radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016; 6(6): e259–e267.
- The Royal College of Radiologists, Society and College of Radiographers, Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine. . On target: ensuring geometric accuracy in radiotherapy. The Royal College of Radiologists, London 2008.
- O'Shea E, Armstrong J, Gillham C, et al. A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate three immobilisation devices for intra-thoracic radiation therapy. J Radiother Pract. 2010; 9(2): 65–75.
- van Herk M. Errors and margins in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004; 14(1): 52–64.
- Remeijer P, Geerlof E, Ploeger L, et al. 3-D portal image analysis in clinical practice: an evaluation of 2-D and 3-D analysis techniques as applied to 30 prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000; 46(5): 1281–1290.
- Halperin R, Roa W, Field M, et al. Setup reproducibility in radiation therapy for lung cancer: a comparison between T-bar and expanded foam immobilization devices. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 43(1): 211–216.
- Stroom JC, de Boer HC, Huizenga H, et al. Inclusion of geometrical uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning by means of coverage probability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999; 43(4): 905–919.
- Howlin C, O'Shea E, Dunne M, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing customized versus standard headrests for head and neck radiotherapy immobilization in terms of set-up errors, patient comfort and staff satisfaction (ICORG 08-09). Radiography. 2015; 21(1): 74–83.
- Lee N, Tam M, Lok B, et al. The Immobilization Performance of a Novel “Open-Face” Mask Used for the Setup of Claustrophobic Patients Being Treated for Head-and-Neck Cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 84(3): S858.
- Jain V, Soni TP, Singh DK, et al. A prospective study to assess and quantify the setup errors with cone-beam computed tomography in head-and-neck cancer image-guided radiotherapy treatment. J Cancer Res Ther. 2023; 19(3): 783–787.
- Delishaj D, Ursino S, Pasqualetti F, et al. Set-up errors in head and neck cancer treated with IMRT technique assessed by cone-beam computed tomography: a feasible protocol. Radiat Oncol J. 2018; 36(1): 54–62.
- Al-Mamgani A, Kessels R, Janssen T, et al. The dosimetric and clinical advantages of the GTV-CTV-PTV margins reduction by 6 mm in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Significant acute and late toxicity reduction. Radiother Oncol. 2022; 168: 16–22.
- Keast R, Sundaresan P, Burns M, et al. Exploring head and neck cancer patients' experiences with radiation therapy immobilisation masks: A qualitative study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020; 29(2): e13215.
- Nixon JL, Brown B, Pigott AE, et al. A prospective examination of mask anxiety during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer and patient perceptions of management strategies. J Med Radiat Sci. 2019; 66(3): 184–190.