Vol 25, No 6 (2020)
Original research articles
Published online: 2020-11-01

open access

Page views 248
Article views/downloads 306
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Surgery versus radiotherapy: Long term outcomes of T1 glottic cancer

Nelson Ferreira1, Eduardo Netto12, Leonor Fonseca1, João Fonseca1, Susana Esteves3, Miguel Labareda1, António Mota1, Rute Pocinho1, Miguel Magalhães4, Filomena Santos1
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.08.007
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020;25(6):860-866.

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes, patterns of failure and laryngeal preservation rates in patients with T1N0 glottic cancer treated with surgery or radiotherapy.

Materials/methods

Retrospective study of T1N0 glottic cancer patients treated in our institution between January 2007 and December 2017. Histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma patients, treated with upfront cordectomy/partial laryngectomy (S group) or radiotherapy (RT group) were included. Elective treatment of the neck was not permitted. Local failure (LF), disease-free survival (DFS), ultimate disease-free survival (UDFS), laryngectomy-free survival (LFS), disease-specific mortality (DSM) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

Results

Two hundred and one patients were eligible (172 S group, 29 RT group), with a median follow-up of 38.8 months. Overall, 33 (16%) patients had a recurrence, 30 (17%) in the S group and 3 (10%) in the RT group. Local failure was the predominant site of failure (28 S, 2 RT). Overall, of all those that were salvaged, 17 (8%) underwent total laryngectomy (15 S, 2 RT). There was no significant difference in the 5-year cumulative incidence of LF (20.8% S, 8.1% RT, p=0.138), 5-y LFS (85.0% vs. 91.7%, p=0.809), 5-y DFS (67.5% vs. 82.1%, p=0.343), 5-y UDFS (82.5% vs. 90.3%, p=0.647) and 5-y OS (84.5% vs. 90.3%, p=0.892). Multivariate analysis showed no correlation between initial treatment and the analyzed outcomes.

Conclusion

Primary surgery or radiotherapy were similar first line options, since they do not differ in all outcomes. Patients’ and physician's preferences must be considered when choosing first treatment.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file