open access

Vol 25, No 4 (2020)
Original research articles
Published online: 2020-07-01
Submitted: 2020-01-19
Get Citation

Dosimetric comparison of dynamic conformal arc integrated with segment shape optimization and variable dose rate versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for liver SBRT

Deepak Thaper, Rose Kamal, Gaganpreet Singh, Arun S. Oinam, Hanuman P. Yadav, Rishabh Kumar, Vivek Kumar
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.017
·
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020;25(4):667-677.

open access

Vol 25, No 4 (2020)
Original research articles
Published online: 2020-07-01
Submitted: 2020-01-19

Abstract

Aim

The aim is a dosimetric comparison of dynamic conformal arc integrated with the segment shape optimization and variable dose rate (DCA_SSO_VDR) versus VMAT for liver SBRT and interaction of various treatment plan quality indices with PTV and degree of modulation (DoM) for both techniques.

Background

The DCA is the state-of-the-art technique but overall inferior to VMAT, and the DCA_SSO_VDR technique was not studied for liver SBRT.

Materials and methods

Twenty-five patients of liver SBRT treated using the VMAT technique were selected. DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans were also generated for all patients in Monaco TPS using the same objective constraint template and treatment planning parameters as used for the VMAT technique. For comparison purpose, organs at risk (OARs) doses and treatment plans quality indices, such as maximum dose of PTV (Dmax%), mean dose of PTV (Dmean%), maximum dose at 2 cm in any direction from the PTV (D2cm%), total monitor units (MU’s), gradient index R50%, degree of modulation (DoM), conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and healthy tissue mean dose (HTMD) were compared.

Results

Significant dosimetric differences were observed in several OARs doses and lowered in VMAT plans. The D2cm%, R50%, CI, HI and HTMD are dosimetrically inferior in DCA_SSO_VDR plans. The higher DoM results in poor dose gradient and better dose gradient for DCA_SSO_VDR and VMAT treatment plans, respectively.

Conclusions

For liver SBRT, DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans are neither dosimetrically superior nor better alternative to the VMAT delivery technique. A reduction of 69.75% MU was observed in DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans. For the large size of PTV and high DoM, DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans result in poorer quality.

Abstract

Aim

The aim is a dosimetric comparison of dynamic conformal arc integrated with the segment shape optimization and variable dose rate (DCA_SSO_VDR) versus VMAT for liver SBRT and interaction of various treatment plan quality indices with PTV and degree of modulation (DoM) for both techniques.

Background

The DCA is the state-of-the-art technique but overall inferior to VMAT, and the DCA_SSO_VDR technique was not studied for liver SBRT.

Materials and methods

Twenty-five patients of liver SBRT treated using the VMAT technique were selected. DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans were also generated for all patients in Monaco TPS using the same objective constraint template and treatment planning parameters as used for the VMAT technique. For comparison purpose, organs at risk (OARs) doses and treatment plans quality indices, such as maximum dose of PTV (Dmax%), mean dose of PTV (Dmean%), maximum dose at 2 cm in any direction from the PTV (D2cm%), total monitor units (MU’s), gradient index R50%, degree of modulation (DoM), conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and healthy tissue mean dose (HTMD) were compared.

Results

Significant dosimetric differences were observed in several OARs doses and lowered in VMAT plans. The D2cm%, R50%, CI, HI and HTMD are dosimetrically inferior in DCA_SSO_VDR plans. The higher DoM results in poor dose gradient and better dose gradient for DCA_SSO_VDR and VMAT treatment plans, respectively.

Conclusions

For liver SBRT, DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans are neither dosimetrically superior nor better alternative to the VMAT delivery technique. A reduction of 69.75% MU was observed in DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans. For the large size of PTV and high DoM, DCA_SSO_VDR treatment plans result in poorer quality.

Get Citation

Keywords

DCA; VDR; SSO; VMAT; SBRT; Dosimetric

About this article
Title

Dosimetric comparison of dynamic conformal arc integrated with segment shape optimization and variable dose rate versus volumetric modulated arc therapy for liver SBRT

Journal

Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy

Issue

Vol 25, No 4 (2020)

Pages

667-677

Published online

2020-07-01

DOI

10.1016/j.rpor.2020.04.017

Bibliographic record

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020;25(4):667-677.

Keywords

DCA
VDR
SSO
VMAT
SBRT
Dosimetric

Authors

Deepak Thaper
Rose Kamal
Gaganpreet Singh
Arun S. Oinam
Hanuman P. Yadav
Rishabh Kumar
Vivek Kumar

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: journals@viamedica.pl