Vol 25, No 3 (2020)
Original research articles
Published online: 2020-05-01

open access

Page views 408
Article views/downloads 415
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

A comparative study between open-face and closed-face masks for head and neck cancer (HNC) in radiation therapy

Zaheeda Mulla1, Rolina K. Alwassia12, Essam Mohammad Senan1, Shamel Soaida3, Ahmed Ahmed Mohamed14, Hussain Almerdhemah1, Hafiz Asif Iqbal1, Hane Mohammad Muamenah1
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.03.009
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020;25(3):382-388.

Abstract

Aim

To determine the setup reproducibility in the radiation treatment of Head and Neck (HN) patients using open face head and shoulder masks (OHSM) with customized headrest (CHR) versus standard closed head and shoulder masks (CHSM) and to determine the patient’s level of comfort and satisfaction for both masks.

Methods

Forty patients were prospectively randomized into two groups using simple random sampling. Group 1 was assigned with CHSMs, immobilized with a standard HR (SHR) while Group 2 was assigned with OHSMs, and immobilized with CHR. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was taken the first 3 days, followed by weekly CBCT (prior treatment) with results registered to the planning CT to determine translational and rotational inter-fraction shifts and to verify accuracy. Mean (M) and standard deviation (SD) of the systematic and random setup errors of the 2 arms in the translational and rotational directions were analyzed, using Independent t-test and Mann–Whitney U test. Patient comfort was measured using a Likert questionnaire.

Results

The vertical, lateral, longitudinal and Z/roll rotational shifts were not significantly different between the two masks. X/yaw and Y/pitch rotational shifts were significantly greater in Group 2 versus Group 1, for both systematic (p=0.009 and 0.046, respectively) and random settings (p=0.016 and 0.020) but still within three degrees. Patients reported higher neck and shoulder comfort (p=0.020) and overall satisfaction (p=0.026) using the OHSM with the CHR versus the CHSM with the SHR during CT simulation.

Conclusion

Open masks provide comparable yet comfortable immobilization to closed masks for HN radiotherapy.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file



Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy