Vol 25, No 2 (2020)
Original research articles
Published online: 2020-03-01

open access

Page views 215
Article views/downloads 293
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Prospective evaluation of the setup errors and its impact on safety margin for cervical cancer pelvic conformal radiotherapy

Avinash Badajena1, Vijay Parshuram Raturi2, Kirti Sirvastava1, Hidehiro Hojo2, Hajime Ohyoshi2, Yanping Bei2, Toshiya Rachi2, Chen-Ta Wu3, Taku Tochinai2, Masayuki Okumura2, Haiqin Zhang2, Hirotaki Kouta2, Pragya Verma1, Geeta Singh1, Abhishek Anand1, Anjali Sachan1
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.02.006
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020;25(2):260-265.

Abstract

Aim

The primary objective was to assess set-up errors (SE) and secondary objective was to determine optimal safety margin (SM)

Background

To evaluate the SE and its impact on the SM utilizing electronic portal imaging (EPI) for pelvic conformal radiotherapy.

Material and methods

20 cervical cancer patients were enrolled in this prospective study. Supine position with ankle and knee rest was used during CT simulation. The contouring was done using consensus guideline for intact uterus. 50 Gy in 25 fractions were delivered at the isocenter with ≥95% PTV coverage. Two orthogonal (Anterior and Lateral) digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) was constructed as a reference image. The pair of orthogonal [Anterior-Posterior and Right Lateral] single exposure EPIs during radiation was taken. The reference DRR and EPIs were compared for shifts, and SE was calculated in the X-axis, Y-axis, and Z-axis directions.

Results

320 images (40 DRRs and 280 EPIs) were assessed. The systematic error in the Z-axis (AP EPI), X-axis (AP EPI), and Y-axis (Lat EPI) ranged from -12.0 to 11.8 mm, -10.3 to 7.5 mm, and -8.50 to 9.70 mm, while the random error ranged from 1.60 to 6.15 mm, 0.59 to 4.93 mm, and 1.02 to –4.35 mm. The SM computed were 7.07, 6.36, and 7.79 mm in the Y-axis, X-axis, and Z-axis by Van Herk’s equation, and 6.0, 5.51, and 6.74 mm by Stroom’s equation.

Conclusion

The computed SE helps defining SM, and it may differ between institutions. In our study, the calculated SM was approximately 8 mm in the Z-axis, 7 mm in X and Y axis for pelvic conformal radiotherapy.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file



Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy