Vol 24, No 1 (2019)
Original research articles
Published online: 2019-01-01

open access

Page views 216
Article views/downloads 296
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Multi-institutional evaluation using the end-to-end test for implementation of dynamic techniques of radiation therapy in Thailand

Lalida Tuntipumiamorn1, Puangpen Tangboonduangjit2, Taweap Sanghangthum3, Rattapol Rangseevijitprapa4, Chirasak Khamfongkhruea5, Thida Niyomthai6, Boonrut Vuttiprasertpong7, Supranee Supanant8, Nongnuch Chatchaipaiboon8, Porntip Iampongpaiboon1, Pitchayut Nakkrasae1, Tanwiwat Jaikuna1
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.11.005
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2019;24(1):124-132.

Abstract

Aim

In this study, an accuracy survey of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric arc radiation therapy (VMAT) implementation in radiotherapy centers in Thailand was conducted.

Background

It is well recognized that there is a need for radiotherapy centers to evaluate the accuracy levels of their current practices, and use the related information to identify opportunities for future development.

Materials and methods

An end-to-end test using a CIRS thorax phantom was carried out at 8 participating centers. Based on each center's protocol for simulation and planning, linac-based IMRT or VMAT plans were generated following the IAEA (CRP E24017) guidelines. Point doses in the region of PTVs and OARs were obtained from 5 ionization chamber readings and the dose distribution from the radiochromic films. The global gamma indices of the measurement doses and the treatment planning system calculation doses were compared.

Results

The large majority of the RT centers (6/8) fulfilled the dosimetric goals, with the measured and calculated doses at the specification points agreeing within ±3% for PTV and ±5% for OARS. At 2 centers, TPS underestimated the lung doses by about 6% and spinal cord doses by 8%. The mean percentage gamma pass rates for the 8 centers were 98.29±0.67% (for the 3%/3mm criterion) and 96.72±0.84% (for the 2%/2mm criterion).

Conclusions

The 8 participating RT centers achieved a satisfactory quality level of IMRT/VMAT clinical implementation.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file