Vol 24, No 1 (2019)
Original research articles
Published online: 2019-01-01

open access

Page views 219
Article views/downloads 249
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Feasibility of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to treat gastric cancer

Agnieszka Skrobala12, Marta Adamczyk2, Aldona Karczewska-Dzionk3
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.10.006
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2019;24(1):68-73.

Abstract

Aim

To present a proposed gastric cancer intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment planning protocol for an institution that have not introduced volumetric modulated arc therapy in clinical practice. A secondary aim was to determine the impact of 2DkV set-up corrections on target coverage and organ at risk (OAR).

Methods and Materials

Twenty consecutive patients were treated with a specially-designed non-coplanar 7-field IMRT technique. The isocenter-shift method was used to estimate the impact of 2DkV-based set-up corrections on the original base plan (BP) coverage. An alternative plan was simulated (SP) by taking into account isocenter shifts. The SP and BP were compared using dose-volume histogram (DVH) plots calculated for the internal target volume (ITV) and OARs.

Results

Both plans delivered a similar mean dose to the ITV (100.32 vs. 100.40%), with no significant differences between the plans in internal target coverage (5.37 vs. 4.96%). Similarly, no significant differences were observed between the maximal dose to the spinal cord (67.70 and 67.09%, respectively) and volume received 50% of the prescribed dose of: the liver (62.11 vs. 59.84%), the right (17.62 vs. 18.58%) and left kidney (29.40 vs. 30.48%). Set-up margins (SM) were computed as 7.80mm, 10.17mm and 6.71mm in the left-right, cranio-caudal and anterior-posterior directions, respectively.

Conclusion

Presented IMRT protocol (OAR dose constraints with selected SM verified by 2DkV verification) for stomach treatment provided optimal dose distribution for the target and the critical organs. Comparison of DVH for the base and the modified plan (which considered set-up uncertainties) showed no significant differences.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file