open access

Vol 23, No 3 (2018)
Original research articles
Published online: 2018-05-01
Submitted: 2017-09-19
Get Citation

Is volumetric modulated arc therapy with constant dose rate a valid option in radiation therapy for head and neck cancer patients?

Annamaria Didona, Valentina Lancellotta, Claudio Zucchetti, Bianca Moira Panizza, Alessandro Frattegiani, Martina Iacco, Anna Concetta Di Pilato, Simonetta Saldi, Cynthia Aristei
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.02.007
·
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2018;23(3):175-182.

open access

Vol 23, No 3 (2018)
Original research articles
Published online: 2018-05-01
Submitted: 2017-09-19

Abstract

Background

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) improves dose distribution in head and neck (HN) radiation therapy. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a new form of IMRT, delivers radiation in single or multiple arcs, varying dose rates (VDR-VMAT) and gantry speeds, has gained considerable attention. Constant dose rate VMAT (CDR-VMAT) associated with a fixed gantry speed does not require a dedicated linear accelerator like VDR-VMAT. The present study explored the feasibility, efficiency and delivery accuracy of CDR-VMAT, by comparing it with IMRT and VDR-VMAT in treatment planning for HN cancer.

Methods and materials

Step and shoot IMRT (SS-IMRT), CDR-VMAT and VDR-VMAT plans were created for 15 HN cancer patients and were generated by Pinnacle3 TPS (v 9.8) using 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV photon energy. Three PTVs were defined to receive respectively prescribed doses of 66[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy, 60[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy and 54[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy, in 30 fractions. Organs at risk (OARs) included the mandible, spinal cord, brain stem, parotids, salivary glands, esophagus, larynx and thyroid. SS-IMRT plans were based on 7 co-planar beams at fixed gantry angles. CDR-VMAT and VDR-VMAT plans, generated by the SmartArc module, used a 2-arc technique: one clockwise from 182° to 178° and the other one anti-clockwise from 178° to 182°. Comparison parameters included dose distribution to PTVs (Dmean, D2%, D50%, D95%, D98% and Homogeneity Index), maximum or mean doses to OARs, specific dose-volume data, the monitor units and treatment delivery times.

Results

Compared with SS-IMRT, CDR-VMAT significantly reduced the maximum doses to PTV1 and PTV2 and significantly improved all PTV3 parameters, except D98% and D95%. It significantly spared parotid and submandibular glands and was associated with a lower Dmean to the larynx. Compared with VDR-VMAT, CDR-VMAT was linked to a significantly better Dmean, to the PTV3 but results were worse for the parotids, left submandibular gland, esophagus and mandible. Furthermore, the Dmean to the larynx was also worse. Compared with SS-IMRT and VDR-VMAT, CDR-VMAT was associated with higher average monitor unit values and significantly shorter average delivery times.

Conclusions

CDR-VMAT appeared to be a valid option in Radiation Therapy Centers that lack a dedicated linear accelerator for volumetric arc therapy with variable dose-rates and gantry velocities, and are unwilling or unable to sanction major expenditure at present but want to adopt volumetric techniques.

Abstract

Background

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) improves dose distribution in head and neck (HN) radiation therapy. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a new form of IMRT, delivers radiation in single or multiple arcs, varying dose rates (VDR-VMAT) and gantry speeds, has gained considerable attention. Constant dose rate VMAT (CDR-VMAT) associated with a fixed gantry speed does not require a dedicated linear accelerator like VDR-VMAT. The present study explored the feasibility, efficiency and delivery accuracy of CDR-VMAT, by comparing it with IMRT and VDR-VMAT in treatment planning for HN cancer.

Methods and materials

Step and shoot IMRT (SS-IMRT), CDR-VMAT and VDR-VMAT plans were created for 15 HN cancer patients and were generated by Pinnacle3 TPS (v 9.8) using 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV photon energy. Three PTVs were defined to receive respectively prescribed doses of 66[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy, 60[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy and 54[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy, in 30 fractions. Organs at risk (OARs) included the mandible, spinal cord, brain stem, parotids, salivary glands, esophagus, larynx and thyroid. SS-IMRT plans were based on 7 co-planar beams at fixed gantry angles. CDR-VMAT and VDR-VMAT plans, generated by the SmartArc module, used a 2-arc technique: one clockwise from 182° to 178° and the other one anti-clockwise from 178° to 182°. Comparison parameters included dose distribution to PTVs (Dmean, D2%, D50%, D95%, D98% and Homogeneity Index), maximum or mean doses to OARs, specific dose-volume data, the monitor units and treatment delivery times.

Results

Compared with SS-IMRT, CDR-VMAT significantly reduced the maximum doses to PTV1 and PTV2 and significantly improved all PTV3 parameters, except D98% and D95%. It significantly spared parotid and submandibular glands and was associated with a lower Dmean to the larynx. Compared with VDR-VMAT, CDR-VMAT was linked to a significantly better Dmean, to the PTV3 but results were worse for the parotids, left submandibular gland, esophagus and mandible. Furthermore, the Dmean to the larynx was also worse. Compared with SS-IMRT and VDR-VMAT, CDR-VMAT was associated with higher average monitor unit values and significantly shorter average delivery times.

Conclusions

CDR-VMAT appeared to be a valid option in Radiation Therapy Centers that lack a dedicated linear accelerator for volumetric arc therapy with variable dose-rates and gantry velocities, and are unwilling or unable to sanction major expenditure at present but want to adopt volumetric techniques.

Get Citation

Keywords

Head and neck radiation therapy; Intensity modulated radiotherapy; Constant dose rate VMAT; Volumetric-modulated arc therapy

About this article
Title

Is volumetric modulated arc therapy with constant dose rate a valid option in radiation therapy for head and neck cancer patients?

Journal

Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy

Issue

Vol 23, No 3 (2018)

Pages

175-182

Published online

2018-05-01

DOI

10.1016/j.rpor.2018.02.007

Bibliographic record

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2018;23(3):175-182.

Keywords

Head and neck radiation therapy
Intensity modulated radiotherapy
Constant dose rate VMAT
Volumetric-modulated arc therapy

Authors

Annamaria Didona
Valentina Lancellotta
Claudio Zucchetti
Bianca Moira Panizza
Alessandro Frattegiani
Martina Iacco
Anna Concetta Di Pilato
Simonetta Saldi
Cynthia Aristei

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: journals@viamedica.pl