Vol 23, No 2 (2018)
Original research articles
Published online: 2018-03-01

open access

Page views 253
Article views/downloads 410
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Accuracy evaluation of distance inverse square law in determining virtual electron source location in Siemens Primus linac

Hamid Shafaei Douk1, Mahmoud Reza Aghamiri1, Mahdi Ghorbani2, Bagher Farhood3, Mohsen Bakhshandeh4, Hamid Reza Hemmati1
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.01.002
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2018;23(2):105-113.

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of the inverse square law (ISL) method for determining location of virtual electron source (SVir) in Siemens Primus linac.

Background

So far, different experimental methods have presented for determining virtual and effective electron source location such as Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM), Multiple Coulomb Scattering (MCS), and Multi Pinhole Camera (MPC) and Inverse Square Law (ISL) methods. Among these methods, Inverse Square Law is the most common used method.

Materials and methods

Firstly, Siemens Primus linac was simulated using MCNPX Monte Carlo code. Then, by using dose profiles obtained from the Monte Carlo simulations, the location of SVir was calculated for 5, 7, 8, 10, 12 and 14[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MeV electron energies and 10[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]×[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]10[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm, 15[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]×[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]15[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm, 20[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]×[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]20[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm and 25[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]×[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]25[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm field sizes. Additionally, the location of SVir was obtained by the ISL method for the mentioned electron energies and field sizes. Finally, the values obtained by the ISL method were compared to the values resulted from Monte Carlo simulation.

Results

The findings indicate that the calculated SVir values depend on beam energy and field size. For a specific energy, with increase of field size, the distance of SVir increases for most cases. Furthermore, for a special applicator, with increase of electron energy, the distance of SVir increases for most cases. The variation of SVir values versus change of field size in a certain energy is more than the variation of SVir values versus change of electron energy in a certain field size.

Conclusion

According to the results, it is concluded that the ISL method can be considered as a good method for calculation of SVir location in higher electron energies (14[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MeV).

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file



Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy