Vol 22, No 6 (2017)
Original research articles
Published online: 2017-11-01

open access

Page views 190
Article views/downloads 234
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Does intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alter prostate size? Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of patients undergoing IMRT alone

Hidekazu Tanaka1, Takahiro Yamaguchi1, Kae Hachiya1, Masahide Hayashi2, Shinichi Ogawa2, Hironori Nishibori2, Shingo Kamei3, Satoshi Ishihara3, Masayuki Matsuo1
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.009
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2017;22(6):477-481.

Abstract

Aim

To assess the changes in prostate size in patients with prostate cancer undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Background

The effect of size change produced by IMRT is not well known.

Materials and methods

We enrolled 72 patients who received IMRT alone without androgen-deprivation therapy and underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination before and after IMRT. The diameter of the entire prostate in the anterior–posterior (P-AP) and left–right (P-LR) directions was measured. The transitional zone diameter in the anterior–posterior (T-AP) and left–right (T-LR) directions was also measured.

Results

The average relative P-AP values at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after IMRT compared to the pre-IMRT value were 0.94, 0.90, 0.89, 0.89, and 0.90, respectively; the average relative P-LR values were 0.93, 0.92, 0.91, 0.91, and 0.90, respectively. The average P-AP and P-LR decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months post-IMRT, and remained unchanged thereafter. The average relative T-AP values at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after IMRT compared to the pre-IMRT value were 0.93, 0.88, 0.91, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively; the average relative T-LR values were 0.96, 0.90, 0.91, 0.87, and 0.88, respectively. The average T-AP and T-LR also decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months post-IMRT, and remained unchanged thereafter. At 12 months after IMRT, the average relative T-AP was significantly lower in patients with recurrence than in those without recurrence.

Conclusions

The average prostate diameter decreased by approximately 10% during the 12 months after IMRT; thereafter remained unchanged.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file