open access

Vol 22, No 6 (2017)
Original research articles
Published online: 2017-11-01
Submitted: 2017-03-22
Get Citation

Software-based evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning

Sarah Clarke, Josie Goodworth, Justin Westhuyzen, Brendan Chick, Matthew Hoffmann, Jacqueline Pacey, Stuart Greenham
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.001
·
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2017;22(6):441-449.

open access

Vol 22, No 6 (2017)
Original research articles
Published online: 2017-11-01
Submitted: 2017-03-22

Abstract

Aim

To use plan analysis software to evaluate a class solution for prostate intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning.

Background

Class solutions for radiotherapy planning are increasingly being considered for streamlining planning. Plan analysis software provides an objective approach to evaluating radiotherapy plans.

Materials and methods

Three iterations of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning (T1, T2 and Tfinal) were compared to the clinical plan of 74 prostate patients using radiotherapy plan analysis software (Plan IQ™, Sun Nuclear Corporation). A set of institution-specific plan quality metrics (scores) were established, based on best practice guidelines.

Results

For CTV coverage, Tfinal was not significantly different to the clinical plan. With the exception of 95% PTV coverage, Tfinal metrics were significantly better than the clinical plan for PTV coverage. In the scoring analysis, mean dose, 95% and 107% isodose coverage scores were similar for all the templates and clinical plan. 100% coverage of the CTV clinical plan was similar to Tfinal but scored higher than T1 and T2. There were no significant differences between Tfinal and the clinical plan for the metrics and scores associated with organs at risk. The total plan score was similar for Tfinal and the clinical plan, although the scores for volume receiving total dose outside the PTV were higher for Tfinal than for the clinical plan (P[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]<[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.0001).

Conclusions

The radiotherapy plan analysis software was useful for evaluating a class solution for prostate IMRT planning and provided evidence that the class solution produced clinically acceptable plans for these patients.

Abstract

Aim

To use plan analysis software to evaluate a class solution for prostate intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) planning.

Background

Class solutions for radiotherapy planning are increasingly being considered for streamlining planning. Plan analysis software provides an objective approach to evaluating radiotherapy plans.

Materials and methods

Three iterations of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning (T1, T2 and Tfinal) were compared to the clinical plan of 74 prostate patients using radiotherapy plan analysis software (Plan IQ™, Sun Nuclear Corporation). A set of institution-specific plan quality metrics (scores) were established, based on best practice guidelines.

Results

For CTV coverage, Tfinal was not significantly different to the clinical plan. With the exception of 95% PTV coverage, Tfinal metrics were significantly better than the clinical plan for PTV coverage. In the scoring analysis, mean dose, 95% and 107% isodose coverage scores were similar for all the templates and clinical plan. 100% coverage of the CTV clinical plan was similar to Tfinal but scored higher than T1 and T2. There were no significant differences between Tfinal and the clinical plan for the metrics and scores associated with organs at risk. The total plan score was similar for Tfinal and the clinical plan, although the scores for volume receiving total dose outside the PTV were higher for Tfinal than for the clinical plan (P[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]<[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.0001).

Conclusions

The radiotherapy plan analysis software was useful for evaluating a class solution for prostate IMRT planning and provided evidence that the class solution produced clinically acceptable plans for these patients.

Get Citation

Keywords

Prostate; Radiotherapy planning; Software; Solutions

About this article
Title

Software-based evaluation of a class solution for prostate IMRT planning

Journal

Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy

Issue

Vol 22, No 6 (2017)

Pages

441-449

Published online

2017-11-01

DOI

10.1016/j.rpor.2017.08.001

Bibliographic record

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2017;22(6):441-449.

Keywords

Prostate
Radiotherapy planning
Software
Solutions

Authors

Sarah Clarke
Josie Goodworth
Justin Westhuyzen
Brendan Chick
Matthew Hoffmann
Jacqueline Pacey
Stuart Greenham

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: journals@viamedica.pl