open access

Vol 21, No 6 (2016)
Original research articles
Published online: 2016-11-01
Submitted: 2015-11-05
Get Citation

SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment

Tiago Ventura, Maria do Lopes, Brigida Costa Ferreira, Leila Khouri
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.07.002
·
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016;21(6):508-516.

open access

Vol 21, No 6 (2016)
Original research articles
Published online: 2016-11-01
Submitted: 2015-11-05

Abstract

Aim

In this work, a graphical method for radiotherapy treatment plan assessment and comparison, named SPIDERplan, is proposed. It aims to support plan approval allowing independent and consistent comparisons of different treatment techniques, algorithms or treatment planning systems.

Background

Optimized plans from modern radiotherapy are not easy to evaluate and compare because of their inherent multicriterial nature. The clinical decision on the best treatment plan is mostly based on subjective options.

Materials and methods

SPIDERplan combines a graphical analysis with a scoring index. Customized radar plots based on the categorization of structures into groups and on the determination of individual structures scores are generated. To each group and structure, an angular amplitude is assigned expressing the clinical importance defined by the radiation oncologist. Completing the graphical evaluation, a global plan score, based on the structures score and their clinical weights, is determined. After a necessary clinical validation of the group weights, SPIDERplan efficacy, to compare and rank different plans, was tested through a planning exercise where plans had been generated for a nasal cavity case using different treatment planning systems.

Results

SPIDERplan method was applied to the dose metrics achieved by the nasal cavity test plans. The generated diagrams and scores successfully ranked the plans according to the prescribed dose objectives and constraints and the radiation oncologist priorities, after a necessary clinical validation process.

Conclusions

SPIDERplan enables a fast and consistent evaluation of plan quality considering all targets and organs at risk.

Abstract

Aim

In this work, a graphical method for radiotherapy treatment plan assessment and comparison, named SPIDERplan, is proposed. It aims to support plan approval allowing independent and consistent comparisons of different treatment techniques, algorithms or treatment planning systems.

Background

Optimized plans from modern radiotherapy are not easy to evaluate and compare because of their inherent multicriterial nature. The clinical decision on the best treatment plan is mostly based on subjective options.

Materials and methods

SPIDERplan combines a graphical analysis with a scoring index. Customized radar plots based on the categorization of structures into groups and on the determination of individual structures scores are generated. To each group and structure, an angular amplitude is assigned expressing the clinical importance defined by the radiation oncologist. Completing the graphical evaluation, a global plan score, based on the structures score and their clinical weights, is determined. After a necessary clinical validation of the group weights, SPIDERplan efficacy, to compare and rank different plans, was tested through a planning exercise where plans had been generated for a nasal cavity case using different treatment planning systems.

Results

SPIDERplan method was applied to the dose metrics achieved by the nasal cavity test plans. The generated diagrams and scores successfully ranked the plans according to the prescribed dose objectives and constraints and the radiation oncologist priorities, after a necessary clinical validation process.

Conclusions

SPIDERplan enables a fast and consistent evaluation of plan quality considering all targets and organs at risk.

Get Citation

Keywords

Plan approval support; Plan scoring; Treatment planning; Radiation therapy

About this article
Title

SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment

Journal

Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy

Issue

Vol 21, No 6 (2016)

Pages

508-516

Published online

2016-11-01

DOI

10.1016/j.rpor.2016.07.002

Bibliographic record

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016;21(6):508-516.

Keywords

Plan approval support
Plan scoring
Treatment planning
Radiation therapy

Authors

Tiago Ventura
Maria do Lopes
Brigida Costa Ferreira
Leila Khouri

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: journals@viamedica.pl