Vol 21, No 3 (2016)
Original research articles
Published online: 2016-05-01

open access

Page views 178
Article views/downloads 186
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Localized prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy: Long-term outcomes at a European comprehensive cancer centre

Anna Boladeras1, Evelyn Martinez1, Ferran Ferrer1, Cristina Gutierrez1, Salvador Villa2, Joan Pera1, Ferran Guedea1
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.12.002
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016;21(3):181-187.

Abstract

Aims and background

To present survival and toxicity outcomes in patients with clinically localized, non-metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) treated with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

Materials and methods

Retrospective study of 849 PCa patients (pts) treated from 1996 to 2005. Until August 2000, all patients (281) were treated with conventional dose EBRT (<76[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy); subsequent pts received ≥76[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy (565 pts). Median age was 70 years (range, 39–82). Most pts were intermediate (353; 42.8%) or high-risk (344; 41.7%). Mean PSA was 10.1[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]ng/ml. Median dose to the prostate was 75[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy. Complete ADT was administered to 525 pts (61.8%).

Results

Median follow-up was 109.6 months (range, 68.3–193.4). Overall survival (OS) was 92.5% and 81.1% at 5 and 10 years; by risk group (low, intermediate, high), 5- and 10-year OS rates were 94.3% and 85.9%, 92.3% and 79.2%, and 91.9% and 80.2% (p[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]=[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.728). Five- and 10-year BRFS was 94.1% and 80.6% (low risk), 86.4% and 70.9% (intermediate), and 85.2% and 71.4% (high) (p[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]=[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.0666). Toxicity included rectitis: grade 1 (G1) (277 pts; 32.6%), G2 (108; 12.7%), and G3 (20; 2.6%) and urethritis: G1 (294; 34.6%); G2 (223; 26.2%), and G3 (11; 1.3%). By dose rate (<76[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy vs. ≥76[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy), 5 and 10-year BRFS rates were 83.1% and 68.3% vs. 88.4% and 74.8% (p[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]=[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.038).

Conclusions

Our results are comparable to other published series in terms of disease control and toxicity. These findings confirm the need for dose escalation to achieve better biochemical control and the benefits of ADT in high-risk PCa patients.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file