Vol 21, No 1 (2016)
Published online: 2016-01-01

open access

Page views 169
Article views/downloads 169
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Metachronous medulloblastoma and glioblastoma: Implications for clinical and technical aspects of re-irradiation

Vivek Verma1, Rajesh R. Kulkarni1, Abhijeet R. Bhirud1, Nathan R. Bennion1, Rodney D. McComb2, Chi Lin1
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.10.002
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016;21(1):84-89.

Abstract

A seven-year-old male underwent surgical resection and chemoradiation for average risk medulloblastoma; twelve years later, the presence of a necrotic and infiltrative mass in the same area and invading the brainstem prompted a subtotal resection. Pathology was indicative of glioblastoma. He was then treated with concurrent temozolomide and using biologically effective dose calculations for gross residual tumor tissue in the brainstem as well as brainstem tolerance, a radiotherapy dose of 3750[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cGy was chosen, fractionated in twice-daily fractions of 125[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cGy each. The gross tumor volume was expanded with a 5[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]mm margin to the planning target volume, which was also judiciously subtracted from the normal brainstem. He completed his radiotherapy course with subsequent imaging free of residual tumor and continued adjuvant temozolomide and remains under follow-up surveillance. This case underscores the rarity of metachronous medulloblastoma and glioblastoma, of which only five known cases heretofore have been described. We discuss the technicalities of radiotherapy planning in this patient, including common hurdles for radiation oncologists in similar patients.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file



Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy