open access
A surface energy spectral study on the bone heterogeneity and beam obliquity using the flattened and unflattened photon beams
open access
Abstract
Aim
Using flattened and unflattened photon beams, this study investigated the spectral variations of surface photon energy and energy fluence in the bone heterogeneity and beam obliquity.
Background
Surface dose enhancement is a dosimetric concern when using unflattened photon beam in radiotherapy. It is because the unflattened photon beam contains more low-energy photons which are removed by the flattening filter of the flattened photon beam.
Materials and methods
We used a water and bone heterogeneity phantom to study the distributions of energy, energy fluence and mean energy of the 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV flattened and unflattened photon beams (field size[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]=[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]10[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]×[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]10[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm) produced by a Varian TrueBEAM linear accelerator. These elements were calculated at the phantom surfaces using Monte Carlo simulations. The photon energy and energy fluence calculations were repeated with the beam angle turned from 0° to 15°, 30° and 45° in the water and bone phantom.
Results
Spectral results at the phantom surfaces showed that the unflattened photon beams contained more photons concentrated mainly in the low-energy range (0–2[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MeV) than the flattened beams associated with a flattening filter. With a bone layer of 1[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm under the phantom surface and within the build-up region of the 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV photon beam, it is found that both the flattened and unflattened beams had slightly less photons in the energy range <0.4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MeV compared to the water phantom. This shows that the presence of the bone decreased the low-energy photon backscatters to the phantom surface. When both the flattened and unflattened photon beams were rotated from 0° to 45°, the number of photon and mean photon energy increased. This indicates that both photon beams became more hardened or penetrate when the beam angle increased. In the presence of bone, the mean energies of both photon beams increased. This is due to the absorption of low-energy photons by the bone, resulting in more beam hardening.
Conclusions
This study explores the spectral relationships of surface photon energy and energy fluence with bone heterogeneity and beam obliquity for the flattened and unflattened photon beams. The photon spectral information is important in studies on the patient's surface dose enhancement using unflattened photon beams in radiotherapy.
Abstract
Aim
Using flattened and unflattened photon beams, this study investigated the spectral variations of surface photon energy and energy fluence in the bone heterogeneity and beam obliquity.
Background
Surface dose enhancement is a dosimetric concern when using unflattened photon beam in radiotherapy. It is because the unflattened photon beam contains more low-energy photons which are removed by the flattening filter of the flattened photon beam.
Materials and methods
We used a water and bone heterogeneity phantom to study the distributions of energy, energy fluence and mean energy of the 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV flattened and unflattened photon beams (field size[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]=[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]10[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]×[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]10[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm) produced by a Varian TrueBEAM linear accelerator. These elements were calculated at the phantom surfaces using Monte Carlo simulations. The photon energy and energy fluence calculations were repeated with the beam angle turned from 0° to 15°, 30° and 45° in the water and bone phantom.
Results
Spectral results at the phantom surfaces showed that the unflattened photon beams contained more photons concentrated mainly in the low-energy range (0–2[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MeV) than the flattened beams associated with a flattening filter. With a bone layer of 1[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm under the phantom surface and within the build-up region of the 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV photon beam, it is found that both the flattened and unflattened beams had slightly less photons in the energy range <0.4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MeV compared to the water phantom. This shows that the presence of the bone decreased the low-energy photon backscatters to the phantom surface. When both the flattened and unflattened photon beams were rotated from 0° to 45°, the number of photon and mean photon energy increased. This indicates that both photon beams became more hardened or penetrate when the beam angle increased. In the presence of bone, the mean energies of both photon beams increased. This is due to the absorption of low-energy photons by the bone, resulting in more beam hardening.
Conclusions
This study explores the spectral relationships of surface photon energy and energy fluence with bone heterogeneity and beam obliquity for the flattened and unflattened photon beams. The photon spectral information is important in studies on the patient's surface dose enhancement using unflattened photon beams in radiotherapy.
Keywords
Unflattened photon beam; Energy fluence spectrum; Surface dosimetry; Bone heterogeneity; Beam obliquity; Monte Carlo simulation


Title
A surface energy spectral study on the bone heterogeneity and beam obliquity using the flattened and unflattened photon beams
Journal
Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy
Issue
Pages
63-70
Published online
2016-01-01
DOI
10.1016/j.rpor.2015.11.001
Bibliographic record
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016;21(1):63-70.
Keywords
Unflattened photon beam
Energy fluence spectrum
Surface dosimetry
Bone heterogeneity
Beam obliquity
Monte Carlo simulation
Authors
James C.L. Chow
Amir M. Owrangi