Vol 20, No 5 (2015)
Original reearch articles
Published online: 2015-09-01

open access

Page views 172
Article views/downloads 205
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Influence of the type of imaging on the delineation process during the treatment planning

Weronika Jackowiak1, Bartosz Bąk2, Anna Kowalik3, Adam Ryczkowski3, Małgorzata Skórska3, Małgorzata Paszek-Widzińska2
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.05.004
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2015;20(5):351-357.

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to compare the intra- and interobserver contouring variability for structures with density of organ at risk in two types of tomography: kilovoltage computed tomography (KVCT) versus megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT). The intra- and interobserver differences were examined on both types of tomography for structures which simulate human tissue or organs.

Materials and methods

Six structures with density of the liver, bone, trachea, lung, soft tissue and muscle were created and used. For the measurements, the special water phantom with all structures was designed. To evaluate interobserver variability, five observers delineated the structures in both types of computed tomography (CT).

Results

Intraobserver variability was in the range of 1–14% and was the largest for the liver. The observers segmented larger volumes on MVCT compared with KVCT for the trachea (79.56[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]ccm vs.74.91[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]ccm), lung (87.61 vs. 82.50), soft tissue (154.24 vs. 145.47) and muscle (164.01 vs. 157.89). For the liver (98.13 vs. 99.38) and bone (51.86 vs. 67.97), the volume on MVCT was smaller than KVCT. The statistically significant differences between observers were observed for structures with density of the liver, bone and soft tissue on KVCT and for the liver, lung and soft tissue on MVCT. For the structures with density of the trachea and muscles, there were no significant differences for both types of tomography.

Conclusions

During the contouring process the interobserver and intraobserver contouring uncertainty was larger on MVCT, especially for structures with HU near 80, compared with KVCT.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file



Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy