Vol 20, No 1 (2015)
Reviews
Published online: 2015-01-01

open access

Page views 195
Article views/downloads 307
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Could preoperative short-course radiotherapy be the treatment of choice for localized advanced rectal carcinoma?

Juan Pablo Ciria, Mikel Eguiguren1, Sergio Cafiero, Intza Uranga1, Ivan Diaz de Cerio1, Arrate Querejeta1, Jose Maria Urraca1, Julian Minguez1, Elena Guimon1, Jose Ramón Puertolas1
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2014.06.003
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2015;20(1):1-11.

Abstract

Short-course preoperative radiotherapy (RT) is widely used in northern Europe for locally advanced resectable rectal cancer, but its role in the era of advanced imaging techniques is uncertain. Here, we reviewed articles and abstracts on SCRT published from 1974 through 2013 with the goal of identifying patients who might be best suited for short-course RT. We included relevant articles comparing surgery with or without preoperative radiation published before and after the advent of total mesorectal excision. We also analyzed two randomized trials directly comparing short-course RT with conventionally fractionated chemoradiation (the Polish Colorectal Study Group and the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group) that compared short-course RT with conventional chemoradiotherapy. We conclude from our review that short-course RT can be generally applied for operable rectal cancer and produces high rates of pelvic control with acceptable toxicity; it reduces local recurrence rates but does not increase overall survival. SCRT seems to be best used for tumors considered “low risk,” i.e., those that are >5[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]cm from the anal margin, without circumferential margin involvement, and involvement of fewer than 4 lymph nodes. Whether sequential chemotherapy can further improve outcomes remains to be seen, as does the best time for surgery (immediately or 6–8 weeks after RT). We further recommend that selection of patients for short-course RT should be based on findings from magnetic resonance imaging or transrectal ultrasonography.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file