open access

Vol 18, No 6 (2013)
SpeciaI issue papers
Published online: 2013-11-01
Submitted: 2013-04-30
Get Citation

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy with RapidArc: An evaluation of treatment delivery efficiency

Beatriz E. Amendola, Marco Amendola, Naipy Perez, Alejandro Iglesias, Xiaodong Wu
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2013.07.005
·
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2013;18(6):383-386.

open access

Vol 18, No 6 (2013)
SpeciaI issue papers
Published online: 2013-11-01
Submitted: 2013-04-30

Abstract

Aim/background

To evaluate how the use of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with RapidArc® can improve treatment delivery efficiency based on the analysis of the beam-on times and monitor units (MU) needed to deliver therapy for multiple clinical applications in a large patient population.

Materials and methods

A total of 898 treatment courses were delivered in 745 patients treated from October 2008 to March 2013 using RapidArc® treatment plans generated in Eclipse™ TPS. All patients were treated with curative or palliative intent using different techniques including conventional fractionation (83%) and radiosurgery or SBRT (17%), depending on the clinical indications. Treatment delivery was evaluated based on measured beam-on time and recorded MU values delivered on a Varian Trilogy™ linear accelerator.

Results

For conventional fractionation treatments using RapidArc®, the delivery times ranged from 38[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s to 4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]min and 40[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s (average 2[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]min and 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s). For radiosurgical treatments the delivery times ranged from 1[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]min and 42[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s to 9[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]min and 22[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s (average 4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]min and 4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s). The average number of MU per Gy was 301 for the entire group, with 285 for the conventional group and 317 for the radiosurgical group.

Conclusions

In this study with a large heterogeneous population, treatments using RapidArc® were delivered with substantially less beam-on time and fewer MUs than conventional fractionation. This was highly advantageous, increasing flexibility of the scheduling allowing treatment of radiosurgery patients during the regular daily work schedule. Additionally, reduction of leakage radiation dose was achieved.

Abstract

Aim/background

To evaluate how the use of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with RapidArc® can improve treatment delivery efficiency based on the analysis of the beam-on times and monitor units (MU) needed to deliver therapy for multiple clinical applications in a large patient population.

Materials and methods

A total of 898 treatment courses were delivered in 745 patients treated from October 2008 to March 2013 using RapidArc® treatment plans generated in Eclipse™ TPS. All patients were treated with curative or palliative intent using different techniques including conventional fractionation (83%) and radiosurgery or SBRT (17%), depending on the clinical indications. Treatment delivery was evaluated based on measured beam-on time and recorded MU values delivered on a Varian Trilogy™ linear accelerator.

Results

For conventional fractionation treatments using RapidArc®, the delivery times ranged from 38[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s to 4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]min and 40[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s (average 2[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]min and 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s). For radiosurgical treatments the delivery times ranged from 1[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]min and 42[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s to 9[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]min and 22[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s (average 4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]min and 4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]s). The average number of MU per Gy was 301 for the entire group, with 285 for the conventional group and 317 for the radiosurgical group.

Conclusions

In this study with a large heterogeneous population, treatments using RapidArc® were delivered with substantially less beam-on time and fewer MUs than conventional fractionation. This was highly advantageous, increasing flexibility of the scheduling allowing treatment of radiosurgery patients during the regular daily work schedule. Additionally, reduction of leakage radiation dose was achieved.

Get Citation

Keywords

IMRT; RapidArc; VMAT; SBRT; SRS; Treatment Planning software

About this article
Title

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy with RapidArc: An evaluation of treatment delivery efficiency

Journal

Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy

Issue

Vol 18, No 6 (2013)

Pages

383-386

Published online

2013-11-01

DOI

10.1016/j.rpor.2013.07.005

Bibliographic record

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2013;18(6):383-386.

Keywords

IMRT
RapidArc
VMAT
SBRT
SRS
Treatment Planning software

Authors

Beatriz E. Amendola
Marco Amendola
Naipy Perez
Alejandro Iglesias
Xiaodong Wu

Important: This website uses cookies. More >>

The cookies allow us to identify your computer and find out details about your last visit. They remembering whether you've visited the site before, so that you remain logged in - or to help us work out how many new website visitors we get each month. Most internet browsers accept cookies automatically, but you can change the settings of your browser to erase cookies or prevent automatic acceptance if you prefer.

By "Via Medica sp. z o.o." sp.k., ul. Świętokrzyska 73, 80–180 Gdańsk, Poland
tel.:+48 58 320 94 94, fax:+48 58 320 94 60, e-mail: journals@viamedica.pl