Vol 17, No 3 (2012)
Original research articles
Published online: 2012-05-01

open access

Page views 188
Article views/downloads 198
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Radiation techniques used in patients with breast cancer: Results of a survey in Spain

Manuel Algara, Meritxell Arenas1, Dolores De las Peñas Eloisa Bayo1, Julia Muñoz1, José Antonio Carceller1, Juan Salinas1, Ferran Moreno1, Francisco Martínez1, Ezequiel González1, Ángel Montero1
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2012.03.007
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2012;17(3):122-128.

Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the resources and techniques used in the irradiation of patients with breast cancer after lumpectomy or mastectomy and the status of implementation of new techniques and therapeutic schedules in our country.

Background

The demand for cancer care has increased among the Spanish population, as long as cancer treatment innovations have proliferated. Radiation therapy in breast cancer has evolved exponentially in recent years with the implementation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity modulated radiotherapy, image guided radiotherapy and hypofractionation.

Material and Methods

An original survey questionnaire was sent to institutions participating in the SEOR-Mama group (GEORM). In total, the standards of practice in 969 patients with breast cancer after surgery were evaluated.

Results

The response rate was 70% (28/40 centers). In 98.5% of cases 3D conformal treatment was used. All the institutions employed CT-based planning treatment. Boost was performed in 56.4% of patients: electrons in 59.8%, photons in 23.7% and HDR brachytherapy in 8.8%. Fractionation was standard in 93.1% of patients. Supine position was the most frequent. Only 3 centers used prone position. The common organs of risk delimited were: homolateral lung (80.8%) and heart (80.8%). In 84% histograms were used. An 80.8% of the centers used isocentric technique. In 62.5% asymmetric fields were employed. CTV was delimited in 46.2%, PTV in 65% and both in 38.5%. A 65% of the centers checked with portal films. IMRT and hypofractionation were used in 1% and in 5.5% respectively.

Conclusion

In most of centers, 3D conformal treatment and CT-based planning treatment were used. IMRT and hypofractionation are currently poorly implemented in Spain.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file