Vol 15, No 5 (2010)
Published online: 2010-09-01

open access

Page views 139
Article views/downloads 178
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

A dosimetric analysis of 6MV versus 15MV photon energy plans for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) of carcinoma of cervix

Atul Tyagi12, Sanjay S. Supe3, - Sandeep1, Man P. Singh2
DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2010.08.002
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2010;15(5):125-131.

Abstract

Background

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is being used to treat carcinoma of cervix (Ca Cx). Integral dose to normal tissue and increased leakage are the concern about IMRT. 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV photon beam is a good choice of energy for Ca Cx IMRT treatment.

Aim

The objective of this study was to compare intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans generated by 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV and 15[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV photon energies for carcinoma of cervix (Ca Cx) with regards to dosimetric parameters of planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR), homogeneity index (HI), conformity index at 98% level (CI 98%), integral dose to normal tissue (NTID) and total number of monitor units (MUs).

Material and methods

A cohort of 16 patients was selected for this study. All patients were to receive a dose of 50[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy in 25 fractions. IMRT plans were generated for both energies using same dose–volume constraints.

Results

Our results show a comparable coverage of planning target volume (PTV) for both energies. Volume of PTV receiving a prescription dose is 97.8[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.5% and 98.8[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.4% for the 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV and the 15[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV plans. Volume of PTV receiving a dose of 107% is 4.4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]7.8% and 16.1[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]22.2%. Bladder and rectum mean doses for the 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV and the 15[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV photon plans were 39.8[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]3.0[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy and 40.0[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]3.2[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy, and 35.8[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]3.1[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy and 36.0[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]3.1[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]Gy, respectively. Homogeneity index (HI) for both energies was 1.04. The conformity indices at 98% isodose (CI 98%) were 1.3[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.1 and 1.4[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]±[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]0.1 for 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV and 15[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV photon plans, respectively.

Conclusions

We conclude that a 6[[ce:hsp sp="0.25"/]]MV photon is a good choice for Ca Cx IMRT as it produces a highly conformal, homogeneous plan with superior target coverage and better OAR sparing.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file



Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy