open access
Real-time brachytherapy for prostate cancer – implant analysis
open access
Abstract
Background
In HDR brachytherapy precision of catheter implantation is crucial for conformal treatment planning as a starting point for better optimization process.
Aim
The aim was to investigate differences between virtual and real needle position and the effect of needle displacement on dosimetric parameters as a function of prostate volume for better evaluation of “real” implant with respect to final dose distribution.
Materials/Methods
Thirty treatment plans calculated by Nucletron SWIFT™ were randomly selected. Dosimetric data including V100 for prostate gland and D10 for urethra were analyzed as a function of prostate volume and needle displacement.
Needle displacement was determined by measuring the distance between virtual and real positions of respective needles in three sectional images: at the base, apex of the prostate gland and reference image. Dosimetric parameters were determined for consecutive computer plans: virtual (before implantation), live (after implantation and renewed optimization). For the purpose of this study a new parameter, VD (Volume-Dose), was created.
Results
VD indicates the quality of “real” dose distribution with respect to “virtual” treatment plan. In order to realize the assumption of virtual plan (VD<1) for a given prostate volume, mean values of needle displacement r should not exceed racceptable according to the formula: racceptable (Vp) ∝ Vp2. For larger glands (above 30cc) final dose distribution is less dependent on needle displacement than smaller ones.
Conclusions
The experiment determined maximum values of needle displacement for a given Vp parameter, allowing one to take advantage of optimization algorithms and to improve the final dose distribution.
Abstract
Background
In HDR brachytherapy precision of catheter implantation is crucial for conformal treatment planning as a starting point for better optimization process.
Aim
The aim was to investigate differences between virtual and real needle position and the effect of needle displacement on dosimetric parameters as a function of prostate volume for better evaluation of “real” implant with respect to final dose distribution.
Materials/Methods
Thirty treatment plans calculated by Nucletron SWIFT™ were randomly selected. Dosimetric data including V100 for prostate gland and D10 for urethra were analyzed as a function of prostate volume and needle displacement.
Needle displacement was determined by measuring the distance between virtual and real positions of respective needles in three sectional images: at the base, apex of the prostate gland and reference image. Dosimetric parameters were determined for consecutive computer plans: virtual (before implantation), live (after implantation and renewed optimization). For the purpose of this study a new parameter, VD (Volume-Dose), was created.
Results
VD indicates the quality of “real” dose distribution with respect to “virtual” treatment plan. In order to realize the assumption of virtual plan (VD<1) for a given prostate volume, mean values of needle displacement r should not exceed racceptable according to the formula: racceptable (Vp) ∝ Vp2. For larger glands (above 30cc) final dose distribution is less dependent on needle displacement than smaller ones.
Conclusions
The experiment determined maximum values of needle displacement for a given Vp parameter, allowing one to take advantage of optimization algorithms and to improve the final dose distribution.
Keywords
real-time brachytherapy; interstitial implant; prostate volume


Title
Real-time brachytherapy for prostate cancer – implant analysis
Journal
Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy
Issue
Pages
9-14
Published online
2008-01-01
DOI
10.1016/S1507-1367(10)60076-4
Bibliographic record
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2008;13(1):9-14.
Keywords
real-time brachytherapy
interstitial implant
prostate volume
Authors
Marta Szlag
Krzysztof Ślosarek
Agata Rembielak
Brygida Białas
Marek Fijałkowski
Joanna Bystrzycka