Online first
Research paper
Published online: 2025-02-04

open access

Page views 39
Article views/downloads 11
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

Results of radical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer in geriatric and non-geriatric patients

Abrahams Ocanto123, Ramón Cantero34, Rosa Morera35, R Ramírez6, Isabel Rodríguez5, Katherine Castillo7, Felipe Couñago128, Pilar Samper9

Abstract

Background: It is estimated that 60% of new rectal cancer cases will be diagnosed in patients ≥ 65 years old. The geriatric patient is heterogeneous and underrepresented in clinical trials, and oncologic therapies are often tailored with little evidence. We describe a cohort of patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer in geriatric and non-geriatric patients.

Materials and methods: Retrospective and descriptive analysis of 137 patients, 44 (32.1%) ≥ 75 years old and 93 (67.9%) ≤ 75 years old, with diagnosis of locally advanced rectal cancer. All patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT), followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) and adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results: Mean age was 79.5 for ≥ 75 years and 62.7 for ≤ 75 years, tumor location was: upper rectum (16.1% and 11.3%), middle rectum (60.2% and 47.7%) and lower rectum (23.7% and 41%), using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0: 74.1% and 81.8%, ECOG 1: 25.9% and 18.2%. Pathological complete response was 21.5% and 22.7%, partial response, 57% and 59% and no response, 21.5% and 18.3%, respectively. Tumor shrinkage in both groups after neoadjuvant treatment was 34.5% and 35.46%. Local recurrence was 2.2% and 3.2% and distance recurrence, 11.3% and 8.6%, respectively.

Conclusion: The study shows similar outcomes in both groups following radical treatment, with similar rates of pathological complete response. However, it has notable limitations, including a small sample size and the absence of a comprehensive geriatric assessment. To enhance these findings, future research should involve larger patient cohorts with comparative analysis and clinical trials specifically focused on the geriatric population. 

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. World Health Organization GLOBOCAN database. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/home (08.03.2021).
  2. Estimaciones De La Incidencia Del Cáncer En España, 2023. https://redecan.org/storage/documents/02d62122-9adb-4d35-b6d0-551435dbe4ae.pdf.
  3. Capítulo 74. Cáncer. Neoplasias Más Frecuentes. María Victoria Farré Mercadé Raquel Benavent Boladeras (SEGG).
  4. Babaei M, Jansen L, Balavarca Y, et al. Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinical Stage II to III Across European Countries: Variations and Outcomes. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018; 17(1): e129–e142.
  5. Shahir MA, Lemmens VE, van de Poll-Franse LV, et al. Elderly patients with rectal cancer have a higher risk of treatment-related complications and a poorer prognosis than younger patients: a population-based study. Eur J Cancer. 2006; 42(17): 3015–3021.
  6. Claassen YHM, Vermeer NCA, Iversen LH, et al. Treatment and survival of rectal cancer patients over the age of 80 years: a EURECCA international comparison. Br J Cancer. 2018; 119(4): 517–522.
  7. Thiels CA, Bergquist JR, Meyers AJ, et al. Is Chemotherapy or Radiation Therapy in Addition to Surgery Beneficial for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the Elderly? A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Study. World J Surg. 2016; 40(2): 447–455.
  8. Chadi SA, Malcomson L, Ensor J, et al. Factors affecting local regrowth after watch and wait for patients with a clinical complete response following chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer (InterCoRe consortium): an individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018; 3(12): 825–836.
  9. Smith FM, Ahad A, Perez RO, et al. Local Excision Techniques for Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy: What Are We Doing? Dis Colon Rectum. 2017; 60(2): 228–239.
  10. Monsellato I, Alongi F, Bertocchi E, et al. Standard (8 weeks) vs long (12 weeks) timing to minimally-invasive surgery after NeoAdjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled parallel group trial (TiMiSNAR). BMC Cancer. 2019; 19(1): 1215.
  11. Myint AS, Gérard JP. Role of radiotherapy in the treatment of rectal cancer in older patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020; 46(3): 349–357.
  12. Mohile SG, Dale W, Somerfield MR, et al. Practical Assessment and Management of Vulnerabilities in Older Patients Receiving Chemotherapy: ASCO Guideline for Geriatric Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(22): 2326–2347.
  13. Benson AlB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Rectal Cancer, Version 6.2020. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020; 18(7): 806–815.
  14. Capdevila J, Gómez MaA, Guillot M, et al. SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for localized rectal cancer (2021). Clin Transl Oncol. 2022; 24(4): 646–657.
  15. Glynne-Jones R, Wyrwicz L, Tiret E, et al. ESMO Guidelines Committee. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28(suppl_4): iv22–iv40.
  16. Sheikh AR, Yameen H, Hartshorn K. Treatment of Rectal Cancer in Older Adults. Curr Oncol Rep. 2018; 20(12): 102.
  17. Pares S. Nuevo sistema de puntuación con valor pronóstico de mortalidad en la peritonitis del colon izquierdo . http//www.sccirugia.org/actachir/comunicacions/scocolon.htm.
  18. Almeraya J, Blas M, Pichardo M, et al. Resultados a largo plazo en el manejo quirúrgico del cáncer de recto: supervivencia a 5 años. Cir Gen. 2014; 36(4): 225–231.
  19. Personalized treatment of elderly patients with rectal cancer. A position paper by the SIOG- surgical task force, ESSO, ESCP and OSTRiCh Consortium collaborative group | SIOG. http://www.siog.org/node/495.
  20. Margalit DN, Mamon HJ, Ancukiewicz M, et al. Tolerability of combined modality therapy for rectal cancer in elderly patients aged 75 years and older. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 81(5): e735–e741.
  21. Tougeron D, Roullet B, Paillot B, et al. Safety and outcome of chemoradiotherapy in elderly patients with rectal cancer: results from two French tertiary centres. Dig Liver Dis. 2012; 44(4): 350–354.
  22. Gérard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, et al. Clinical outcome of the ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 randomized trial in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(36): 4558–4565.
  23. Garcia-Aguilar J, Chow OS, Smith DD, et al. Timing of Rectal Cancer Response to Chemoradiation Consortium. Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16(8): 957–966.
  24. Wiltink LM, Marijnen CAM, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, et al. A comprehensive longitudinal overview of health-related quality of life and symptoms after treatment for rectal cancer in the TME trial. Acta Oncol. 2016; 55(4): 502–508.
  25. Erlandsson J, Holm T, Pettersson D, et al. Optimal fractionation of preoperative radiotherapy and timing to surgery for rectal cancer (Stockholm III): a multicentre, randomised, non-blinded, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017; 18(3): 336–346.
  26. Bahadoer RR, Dijkstra EA, van Etten B, et al. RAPIDO collaborative investigators. Short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision (TME) versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy, TME, and optional adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (RAPIDO): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22(1): 29–42.
  27. Dattani M, Heald RJ, Goussous G, et al. Oncological and Survival Outcomes in Watch and Wait Patients With a Clinical Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis. Ann Surg. 2018; 268(6): 955–967.
  28. Battersby NJ, How P, Moran B, et al. MERCURY II Study Group. Prospective Validation of a Low Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging Staging System and Development of a Local Recurrence Risk Stratification Model: The MERCURY II Study. Ann Surg. 2016; 263(4): 751–760.
  29. Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J, São Julião GP, et al. Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: impact of salvage therapy on local disease control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 88(4): 822–828.
  30. Yeo HL, O'Mahoney PRA, Lachs M, et al. Surgical oncology outcomes in the aging US population. J Surg Res. 2016; 205(1): 11–18.
  31. Aquina CT, Mohile SG, Tejani MA, et al. The impact of age on complications, survival, and cause of death following colon cancer surgery. Br J Cancer. 2017; 116(3): 389–397.
  32. Couwenberg AM, de Beer FSA, Intven MPW, et al. The impact of postoperative complications on health-related quality of life in older patients with rectal cancer; a prospective cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol. 2018; 9(2): 102–109.
  33. Kosinski L, Habr‐Gama A, Ludwig K, et al. Shifting concepts in rectal cancer management. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012; 62(3): 173–202.
  34. Sargent DJ, Goldberg RM, Jacobson SD, et al. A pooled analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected colon cancer in elderly patients. N Engl J Med. 2001; 345(15): 1091–1097.
  35. Tournigand C, André T, Bonnetain F, et al. Adjuvant therapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin in stage II and elderly patients (between ages 70 and 75 years) with colon cancer: subgroup analyses of the Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012; 30(27): 3353–3360.
  36. Shin J, Seo N, Baek SE, et al. MRI Radiomics Model Predicts Pathologic Complete Response of Rectal Cancer Following Chemoradiotherapy. Radiology. 2022; 303(2): 351–358.
  37. Schurink NW, Lambregts DMJ, Beets-Tan RGH. Diffusion-weighted imaging in rectal cancer: current applications and future perspectives. Br J Radiol. 2019; 92(1096): 20180655.
  38. Ingle M, Blackledge M, White I, et al. Quantitative analysis of diffusion weighted imaging in rectal cancer during radiotherapy using a magnetic resonance imaging integrated linear accelerator. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022; 23: 32–37.
  39. Nikolic A, Krivokapic Z. Nucleic acid-based markers of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Surg Oncol. 2022; 41: 101743.