Vol 29, No 6 (2024)
Research paper
Published online: 2025-01-17

open access

Page views 88
Article views/downloads 5
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

AURKAPS1, HERC2P2 and SDHAP1 pseudogenes: molecular role in development and progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas and their diagnostic utility

Tomasz Kolenda12, Joanna Kozłowska-Masłoń34, Patrycja Mantaj5, Nina Grzejda46, Kacper Kamiński789, Maria Dziuba10, Małgorzata Czarnecka10, Aleksandra Leszczyńska10, Paulina Poter1112, Kacper Guglas4, Klaudia Dudek134, Katarzyna Regulska142, Paulina Gieremek1415, Beata Stanisz15, Anna Florczak-Substyk10, Marlena Janiczek-Polewska1617, Urszula Kazimierczak18, Katarzyna Lamperska24, Zefiryn Cybulski192, Anna Teresiak24
DOI: 10.5603/rpor.104016
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2024;29(6):718-731.

Abstract

Background: Pseudogenes are epigenetic elements whose function is mostly unknown in cancer including head and neck cancers (HNSCCs). In our study we analyzed selected three pseudogenes, aurora kinase A pseudogene 1 (AURKAPS1), hect domain and RLD 2 pseudogene 2 (HERC2P2) and succinate dehydrogenase complex flavoprotein subunit A pseudogene 1 (SDHAP1), in the context of molecular function, biological role and potential utility as a biomarker in HNSCCs.

Materials and methods: Based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data we checked potential association of pseudogenes with pathological and clinical features, survival, cellular phenotype and involvement in pathways and cellular processes, and association with patients' response to radiotherapy.

Results: Only AURKAPS1 pseudogene has significant upregulation in cancer than in normal samples and could be used as a diagnostic biomarker. Expression levels of all pseudogenes are dependent on cancer localization. SDHAP1 are the most differentiated and associated with tumor subtypes, expressions of AURKAPS1 do not depend on this tumor classification. Higher expression levels of AURKAPS1, HERC2P2 and SDHAP1 were associated with more aggressive phenotypes and associated with important cellular pathways and biological processes. Moreover, we observed that the expression of all pseudogenes were higher in human papilloma virus (HPV)(+) than in HPV(–) patients. Only AURKAPS1 was associated with higher genome instability and worse response to radiotherapy. Patients with higher expression levels of AURKAPS1 and HERC2P2 displayed better survival.

Conclusions:  AURKAPS1 is a potential biomarker for HNSCC patients. This pseudogene is associated with changes in DNA repair, which should be more deeply analyzed in the future.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Update on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016; 91(3): 386–396.
  2. Dyzmann-Sroka A, Malicki J, Jędrzejczak A. Cancer incidence in the Greater Poland region as compared to Europe. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020; 25(4): 632–636.
  3. Rupar MJ, Golusinski P, Golusinski W, et al. Human Papillomavirus and the use of nanoparticles for immunotherapy in HPV-related cancer: A review. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2019; 24(6): 544–550.
  4. Alayón LF, Salas BS, Diaz-Saavedra RC, et al. Screening oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with head and neck cancer in a radiation oncology department. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(6): 756–763.
  5. Li CX, Tan XR, Wei W, et al. A radiobiological perspective on radioresistance or/and radiosensitivity of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(6): 809–822.
  6. Yamauchi M, Minesaki A, Ishida T, et al. Induction Chemotherapy With 5-Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, and Cetuximab in Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. In Vivo. 2023; 37(3): 1275–1280.
  7. Gordon K, Gulidov I, Semenov A, et al. Proton re-irradiation of unresectable recurrent head and neck cancers. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021; 26(2): 203–210.
  8. Koiwai K, Hirasawa D, Sugimura M, et al. Impact of upgraded radiotherapy system on outcomes in postoperative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(6): 954–962.
  9. Viani GA, Faustino AC, Danelichen AF, et al. Radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer in elderly patients: results and prognostic factors a single cohort. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021; 26(1): 12–19.
  10. Sindhu SK, Bauman JE. Current Concepts in Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019; 31(1): 145–154.
  11. Bohn JC, Chaiben CL, de Souza SS, et al. Conformational and constitutional analysis of dental caries following radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021; 26(3): 389–399.
  12. Carneiro MC, Chicrala GM, Freitas VM, et al. Assessment of mouth opening before and after head and neck radiotherapy in patients with intraoral stents. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(3): 352–360.
  13. Ito T, Monzen H, Kubo K, et al. Dose difference between anisotropic analytical algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB) caused by target's air content for volumetric modulated arc therapy of head and neck cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(3): 399–406.
  14. Botticelli A, Cirillo A, Strigari L, et al. Anti-PD-1 and Anti-PD-L1 in Head and Neck Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis. Front Immunol. 2021; 12: 705096.
  15. Rajabi-Moghaddam M, Abbaszadeh H. Gene polymorphisms and prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(6): 1045–1057.
  16. Rajabi-Moghaddam M, Abbaszadeh H. Gene polymorphisms and risk of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(6): 1058–1076.
  17. Guglas K, Kozłowska-Masłoń J, Kolenda T, et al. Midsize noncoding RNAs in cancers: a new division that clarifies the world of noncoding RNA or an unnecessary chaos? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(6): 1077–1093.
  18. Kozłowska-Masłoń J, Guglas K, Kolenda T, et al. miRNA in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: promising but still distant future of personalized oncology. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(5): 681–697.
  19. Kolenda T, Guglas K, Kopczyńska M, et al. Good or not good: Role of miR-18a in cancer biology. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020; 25(5): 808–819.
  20. Kolenda T, Guglas K, Baranowski D, et al. cfRNAs as biomarkers in oncology - still experimental or applied tool for personalized medicine already? Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020; 25(5): 783–792.
  21. Kolenda T, Paszkowska A, Braska A, et al. Host gene and its guest: short story about relation of long-noncoding transcript and microRNA . Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(1): 114–134.
  22. Stasiak M, Kolenda T, Kozłowska-Masłoń J, et al. The World of Pseudogenes: New Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets in Cancers or Still Mystery Molecules? Life (Basel). 2021; 11(12).
  23. Du R, Huang C, Liu K, et al. Targeting AURKA in Cancer: molecular mechanisms and opportunities for Cancer therapy. Mol Cancer. 2021; 20(1): 15.
  24. Sala-Gaston J, Martinez-Martinez A, Pedrazza L, et al. HERC Ubiquitin Ligases in Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(6).
  25. Gill AJ, Gill AJ. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and mitochondrial driven neoplasia. Pathology. 2012; 44(4): 285–292.
  26. Thorsson V, Gibbs DL, Brown SD, et al. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. The Immune Landscape of Cancer. Immunity. 2018; 48(4): 812–830.e14.
  27. Kolenda T, Śmiełowska M, Lipowicz J, et al. The RNA world: from experimental laboratory to "in silico" approach. Part 1: User friendly RNA expression databases portals. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024; 29(2): 245–257.
  28. Kolenda T, Poter P, Guglas K, et al. Biological role and diagnostic utility of ribosomal protein L23a pseudogene 53 in cutaneous melanoma. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(2): 255–270.
  29. Paszkowska A, Kolenda T, Guglas K, et al. C10orf55, CASC2, and SFTA1P lncRNAs Are Potential Biomarkers to Assess Radiation Therapy Response in Head and Neck Cancers. J Pers Med. 2022; 12(10).
  30. Viani GA, Gouveia AG, Matsuura FK, et al. Assessing the efficacy of palliative radiation treatment schemes for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a meta-analysis. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(2): 137–146.
  31. Menichelli C, Casamassima F, Aristei C, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for liver oligometastases. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(1): 32–39.
  32. Borghesi S, Casamassima F, Aristei C, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for adrenal oligometastases. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(1): 52–56.
  33. Lupattelli M, Tini P, Nardone V, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for brain oligometastases. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(1): 15–22.
  34. Falcinelli L, Menichelli C, Casamassima F, et al. Stereotactic radiotherapy for lung oligometastases. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(1): 23–31.
  35. de Faria Bessa J, Marta GN. Triple-negative breast cancer and radiation therapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(3): 545–551.
  36. Pietrzak AK, Kazmierska J, Marszalek A, et al. Dual-time-point PET/CT study protocol can improve the larynx cancer diagnosis. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020; 25(4): 533–538.
  37. Jia-Mahasap B, Assavanopakun K, Chitapanarux I, et al. Incidence of radiation-induced hypothyroidism following head and neck irradiation: a single-center analysis. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(3): 479–489.
  38. Sasaki M, Nakaguchi Y, Kamomae T, et al. Predicting the complexity of head-and-neck volumetric-modulated arc therapy planning using a radiation therapy planning quality assurance software. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(6): 963–972.
  39. Dróżdż A, Waluś M, Zieliński M, et al. Verification of electron beam parameters in an intraoperative linear accelerator using dosimetric and radiobiological response methods. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021; 26(6): 1029–1034.
  40. Kawahara D, Saito A, Nagata Y. Improved biological dosimetric margin model for different PTV margins with stereotactic body radiation therapy in homogeneous and nonhomogeneous tumor regions. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2022; 27(5): 768–777.
  41. Kawahara D, Nagata Y. Biological dosimetric impact of dose-delivery time for hypoxic tumour with modified microdosimetric kinetic model. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy. 2023; 28(4): 514–521.
  42. Alves N, Dias JM, Rocha H, et al. Assessing the need for adaptive radiotherapy in head and neck cancer patients using an automatic planning tool. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021; 26(3): 423–432.
  43. Martin-Martin G, Walter S, Guibelalde E. Dose accuracy improvement on head and neck VMAT treatments by using the Acuros algorithm and accurate FFF beam calibration. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021; 26(1): 73–85.
  44. Sundaram V, Khanna D, Mohandass P, et al. Comparison of Progressive Resolution Optimizer and Photon Optimizer algorithms in RapidArc delivery for head and neck SIB treatments. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(5): 623–635.
  45. Staniewska E, Tomasik B, Tarnawski R, et al. The prognostic value of red cell distribution width (RDW), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2021; 26(6): 1010–1018.
  46. Kaźmierska J, Bajon T, Winiecki T, et al. Significance of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of outcome in head and neck cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(3): 389–398.
  47. Ganesh MS, Narayanan GS, Kumar R. Change of telomerase activity in peripheral blood of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma pre and post curative treatment. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020; 25(1): 28–34.
  48. Mehra R, Serebriiskii IG, Burtness B, et al. Aurora kinases in head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14(10): e425–e435.
  49. Li J, Guo W, Xue W, et al. Long noncoding RNA AURKAPS1 potentiates malignant hepatocellular carcinoma progression by regulating miR-142, miR-155 and miR-182. Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1): 19645.
  50. Yang C, Wang L, Sun J, et al. Identification of long non-coding RNA HERC2P2 as a tumor suppressor in glioma. Carcinogenesis. 2019; 40(8): 956–964.
  51. Peng J, Li He, Chen J, et al. Differences in gene expression profile between vocal cord Leukoplakia and normal larynx mucosa by gene chip. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018; 47(1): 13.
  52. Hou H, Lyu Y, Jiang J, et al. Peripheral blood transcriptome identifies high-risk benign and malignant breast lesions. PLoS One. 2020; 15(6): e0233713.
  53. Belinsky MG, Rink L, von Mehren M. Succinate dehydrogenase deficiency in pediatric and adult gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Front Oncol. 2013; 3: 117.
  54. Zhao H, Wang A, Zhang Z. LncRNA SDHAP1 confers paclitaxel resistance of ovarian cancer by regulating EIF4G2 expression via miR-4465. J Biochem. 2020; 168(2): 171–181.
  55. Li W, Lei W, Chao X, et al. Genomic alterations caused by HPV integration in a cohort of Chinese endocervical adenocarcinomas. Cancer Gene Ther. 2021; 28(12): 1353–1364.
  56. Wenzel ES, Singh ATK. Cell-cycle Checkpoints and Aneuploidy on the Path to Cancer. In Vivo. 2018; 32(1): 1–5.