Online first
Letter to the Editor
Published online: 2024-08-12

open access

Page views 10
Article views/downloads 6
Get Citation

Connect on Social Media

Connect on Social Media

An Inpatient Metastatic Spine Neoplasm Score for assessing the appropriate modality of radiation therapy intervention

Shearwood McClelland III12

Abstract

Not required.

Article available in PDF format

View PDF Download PDF file

References

  1. Sahgal A, Myrehaug SD, Siva S, et al. trial investigators. Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021; 22(7): 1023–1033.
  2. Ryu S, Deshmukh S, Timmerman RD, et al. Stereotactic Radiosurgery vs Conventional Radiotherapy for Localized Vertebral Metastases of the Spine: Phase 3 Results of NRG Oncology/RTOG 0631 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023; 9(6): 800–807.
  3. Pan H, Rose BS, Simpson DR, et al. A survey of stereotactic body radiotherapy use in the United States. Cancer. 2011; 117(19): 4566–4572.
  4. McClelland S, Kim E, Passias PG, et al. Spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy in the United States: A decade-long nationwide analysis of patient demographics, practice patterns, and trends over time. J Clin Neurosci. 2017; 46: 109–112.
  5. Zeng KL, Myrehaug S, Soliman H, et al. Mature Local Control and Reirradiation Rates Comparing Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Conventional Palliative External Beam Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022; 114(2): 293–300.
  6. McClelland S3, Sun Y, Spratt DE, et al. Spine Patient Optimal Radiosurgery Treatment for Symptomatic Metastatic Neoplasms (SPORTSMEN): a randomized phase II study protocol. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023; 28(3): 379–388.