Vol 3, No 4 (2017)
Review paper
Published online: 2018-01-22
Biopodobne leki biologiczne w reumatologii
Forum Reumatol 2017;3(4):191-204.
Abstract
Współcześnie pojęcie „leki biologiczne”, czyli „biofarmaceutyki”, oznacza leki, których substancja czynna została wytworzona przez żywe komórki hodowane in vitro. W większości leki biologiczne są dużymi cząsteczkami białkowymi. Synteza białek w żywych komórkach może ulegać pewnym zmianom. Tym samym możliwe są pewne różnice (najczęściej dotyczące modyfikacji posttranslacyjnych) w budowie leków. Muszą one mieścić się w precyzyjnie określonych granicach. Lek biopodobny to lek biologiczny wyprodukowany jako bardzo podobna kopia leku biologicznego innowacyjnego wcześniej zarejestrowanego. Lek biopodobny nie jest lekiem generycznym w ujęciu farmakologicznym. Dopuszczenie leku biopodobnego do stosowania wymaga badań określających jego podobieństwo strukturalne, badań za pomocą testów biologicznych, badań farmakokinetycznych i badań klinicznych oceniających skuteczność i bezpieczeństwo terapii. Lek biopodobny musi cechować się określoną biorównoważnością i jego produkcja, podobnie jak produkcja leku oryginalnego, podlega ścisłemu nadzorowi agencji rejestracyjnej. W reumatologii stosowane są obecnie liczne leki biopodobne, a ich wprowadzanie na rynek łączy się ze zwiększeniem dostępności leczenia biologicznego dla większej liczby chorych z powodu większej konkurencyjności i sukcesywnego obniżania kosztów terapii.
Forum Reumatol. 2017, tom 3, nr 4: 191–204
Keywords: leki biologiczneleki biopodobneleczenie chorób reumatycznych
References
- Rasi G. Foreword. In: Rasi G. ed. Biosimilars in EU. Information guide for healthcare professionals. European Medicines Agency. European Commission. 2017: 2.
- Laraia L, Waldmann H. Natural product inspired compound collections: evolutionary principle, chemical synthesis, phenotypic screening, and target identification. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2017; 23: 75–82.
- Vezér B, Buzás Z, Sebeszta M, et al. Authorized manufacturing changes for therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in European Public Assessment Report (EPAR) documents. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016; 32(5): 829–834.
- Feldman SR. Inflammatory diseases: Integrating biosimilars into clinical practice. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015; 44(6 Suppl): S16–S21.
- Blandizzi C, Meroni PL, Lapadula G. Comparing Originator Biologics and Biosimilars: A Review of the Relevant Issues. Clin Ther. 2017; 39(5): 1026–1039.
- Jedrzejczak WW. Leki biopodobne w hematologii. Acta Haematol Pol. 2009; 40: 563–568.
- Nowicki M, Zimmer-Nowicka J. Biofarmaceutyki oryginalne i leki biopodobne – co należy wiedzieć, aby zapewnić bezpieczeństwo leczenia? Onkol Prakt Klin. 2007; 3: 120–127.
- Grieb P. Kompendium na temat leków biopodobnych. Forum Nefrol. 2011; 4: 193–197.
- Mehr SR, Zimmerman MP. Is a Biologic Produced 15 Years Ago a Biosimilar of Itself Today? Am Health Drug Benefits. 2016; 9(9): 515–518.
- Ghia C, Shah D, Rambhad G, et al. Biologics, biosimilars, intended copies and the era of competitive medicine. Apollo Medicine. 2015; 12(2): 103–111.
- Schellekens H, Lietzan E, Faccin F, et al. Biosimilar monoclonal antibodies: the scientific basis for extrapolation. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2015; 15(11): 1633–1646.
- Lie G, Sciascia S, Cuadrado MJ. Biosimilar vs biological agents in rheumatology: When are biosimilar agents similar enough? Int Immunopharmacol. 2015; 27(2): 220–223.
- Tesser JRp, Furst DE, Jacobs I. Biosimilars and the extrapolation of indications for inflammatory conditions. Biologics. 2017; 11: 5–11.
- Tabernero J, Vyas M, Giuliani R, et al. Biosimilars: a position paper of the European Society for Medical Oncology, with particular reference to oncology prescribers. ESMO Open. 2016; 1(6): e000142.
- Braun J, Kay J. The safety of emerging biosimilar drugs for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017; 16(3): 289–302.
- Dörner T, Strand V, Cornes P, et al. The changing landscape of biosimilars in rheumatology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016; 75(6): 974–982.
- Jørgensen KK, Olsen IC, Goll GL, et al. NOR-SWITCH study group. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017; 389(10086): 2304–2316.
- Schmitz EMH, Benoy-De Keuster S, Meier AJL, et al. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as a tool in the switch from infliximab innovator to biosimilar in rheumatic patients: results of a 12-month observational prospective cohort study. Clin Rheumatol. 2017; 36(9): 2129–2134.
- Glintborg B, Sørensen IJ, Loft AG, et al. all departments of rheumatology in Denmark. A nationwide non-medical switch from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in 802 patients with inflammatory arthritis: 1-year clinical outcomes from the DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017; 76(8): 1426–1431.
- Inotai A, Prins CPJ, Csanádi M, et al. Is there a reason for concern or is it just hype? - A systematic literature review of the clinical consequences of switching from originator biologics to biosimilars. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2017; 17(8): 915–926.
- Moots R, Azevedo V, Coindreau JL, et al. Switching Between Reference Biologics and Biosimilars for the Treatment of Rheumatology, Gastroenterology, and Dermatology Inflammatory Conditions: Considerations for the Clinician. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2017; 19(6): 37.
- Kay J, Schoels MM, Dörner T, et al. Task Force on the Use of Biosimilars to Treat Rheumatological Diseases. Consensus-based recommendations for the use of biosimilars to treat rheumatological diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
- Kucharz EJ. Stanowisko Unii Europejskiej w sprawie leków biopodobnych. Reumatologia News. 2017; 2: 77–79.
- http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/index.jsp?curl=pages%2Fmedicines%2Flanding%2Fepar_search.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058001d124&searchTab=searchByAuthType&alreadyLoaded=true&isNewQuery=true&status=Authorised&keyword=Enter+keywords&searchType=name&taxonomyPath=&treeNumber=&searchGenericType=biosimilars&genericsKeywordSearch=Submit (24.10.2017).
- Lee H, Chung H, Lee S, et al. LBEC0101, A Proposed Etanercept Biosimilar: Pharmacokinetics, Immunogenicity, and Tolerability Profiles Compared with a Reference Biologic Product in Healthy Male Subjects. BioDrugs. 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
- Azevedo V, Galli N, Kleinfelder A, et al. Etanercept biosimilars. Rheumatology International. 2014; 35(2): 197–209.
- https://google2.fda.gov/search?q=adalimumab&client=FDAgov&site=FDAgov&lr=&proxystylesheet=FDAgov&requiredfields=-archive%3AYes&output=xml_no_dtd&getfields=* (24.10.2017).
- Baji P, Péntek M, Szántó S, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of biosimilar infliximab and other biological treatments in ankylosing spondylitis: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Eur J Health Econ. 2014; 15 Suppl 1: S45–S52.
- Yoo DH, Hrycaj P, Miranda P, et al. A randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study to demonstrate equivalence in efficacy and safety of CT-P13 compared with innovator infliximab when coadministered with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: the PLANETRA study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013; 72(10): 1613–1620.
- Park W, Yoo DH, Jaworski J, et al. Comparable long-term efficacy, as assessed by patient-reported outcomes, safety and pharmacokinetics, of CT-P13 and reference infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: 54-week results from the randomized, parallel-group PLANETAS study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2016; 18: 25.
- Park W, Yoo DH, Miranda P, et al. Efficacy and safety of switching from reference infliximab to CT-P13 compared with maintenance of CT-P13 in ankylosing spondylitis: 102-week data from the PLANETAS extension study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017; 76(2): 346–354.
- Taylor P. A scientific update on biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) in rheumatic diseases. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015; 11 Suppl 1: S1–S4.
- Yoo DH. CT-P13 in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2017; 13(7): 653–666.
- Jørgensen KK, Olsen IC, Goll GL, et al. NOR-SWITCH study group. Switching from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 compared with maintained treatment with originator infliximab (NOR-SWITCH): a 52-week, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017; 389(10086): 2304–2316.
- Chang S, Hanauer S. Extrapolation and Interchangeability of Infliximab and Adalimumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2017; 15(1): 53–70.
- Griffiths CEM, Thaçi D, Gerdes S, et al. EGALITY study group. The EGALITY study: a confirmatory, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of GP2015, a proposed etanercept biosimilar, vs. the originator product in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2017; 176(4): 928–938.
- Emery P, Vencovský J, Sylwestrzak A, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis continuing on SB4 or switching from reference etanercept to SB4. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
- Weinblatt ME, Baranauskaite A, Niebrzydowski J, et al. Phase III Randomized Study of SB5, an Adalimumab Biosimilar, Versus Reference Adalimumab in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
- Park W, Suh CH, Shim SC, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Switching from Innovator Rituximab to Biosimilar CT-P10 Compared with Continued Treatment with CT-P10: Results of a 56-Week Open-Label Study in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. BioDrugs. 2017 [Epub ahead of print].
- Glintborg B, Sørensen IJ, Loft AG, et al. all departments of rheumatology in Denmark. A nationwide non-medical switch from originator infliximab to biosimilar CT-P13 in 802 patients with inflammatory arthritis: 1-year clinical outcomes from the DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017; 76(8): 1426–1431.
- Glintborg B, Sørensen IJ, Loft AG. Clinical outcomes from a natiowide non-medical switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept in patients with inflammatory arthritis after 5 months follow up. Results from the DANBIO registry. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017; 76: 553.
- Kanters TA, Stevanovic J, Huys I, et al. Adoption of Biosimilar Infliximab for Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis, and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases in the EU5: A Budget Impact Analysis Using a Delphi Panel. Front Pharmacol. 2017; 8: 322.
- Gulácsi L, Brodszky V, Baji P, et al. The Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 in Rheumatology and Cancer: A Budget Impact Analysis in 28 European Countries. Adv Ther. 2017; 34(5): 1128–1144.
- Brodszky V, Baji P, Balogh O, et al. Budget impact analysis of biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in six Central and Eastern European countries. Eur J Health Econ. 2014; 15 Suppl 1: S65–S71.
- Gulácsi L, Brodszky V, Baji P, et al. Biosimilars for the management of rheumatoid arthritis: economic considerations. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2015; 11 Suppl 1: S43–S52.
- Kucharz EJ. Reumatolog na rozdrożu, czyli o biologicznych lekach biopodobnych. Reumatologia. 2014; 52: 86–88.
- Hemmington A, Dalbeth N, Jarrett P, et al. Medical specialists' attitudes to prescribing biosimilars. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017; 26(5): 570–577.
- Waller J, Sullivan E, Piercy J, et al. Assessing physician and patient acceptance of infliximab biosimilars in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis across Germany. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2017; 11: 519–530.